| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012819814901
Ruling
Subject: Travel expenses
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for your travel between home and your company pick up point?
Answer
No.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2014
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2013
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are a fly in fly out worker.
You travel using multiple forms of public transport to your employer's offices. Once there all travel is organised through your office.
You transport work items between home and work as there is nowhere for you to store the items at the work site.
You transport the work items in a suitcase.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature.
In considering the deductibility of travel expenses a distinction is made between travel to work and travel on work. It is only if the duties of the job require a taxpayer to travel in the course of undertaking their work duties that the taxpayer's expenses can be deducted (Taylor v Provan 1975 AC 194).
A deduction is generally not allowable for the cost of travel by an employee between home and their normal workplace as it is considered to be a private expense. The cost of travel between home and work is generally incurred to put the employee in a position to perform duties of employment, rather than in the performance of those duties. (see paragraph 77 of Taxation Ruling TR 95/34)
However, there are situations where it has been accepted that travel by employees from home to work is deductible. These situations include:
• where the employment can be construed as having commenced at the time of leaving home, for example a doctor on call who provides patient treatment advice over the phone before travelling to continue treatment of the patient in person;
• where you travel between home and shifting places of work, that is, an itinerant occupation; and
• the transportation of bulky equipment in some circumstances.
Your work has not commenced before leaving home and you are not considered to be an itinerant worker.
The case that established the principle that travel between home and work is deductible if the expense is attributed to the transport of bulky equipment is FC of T v. Vogt 75 ATC 4073, 5 ATR 274. In that case, the Supreme Court allowed a deduction for the travel as the taxpayer was required to transport the equipment between home and work and the items 'were of a bulk which meant they could be transported conveniently only by the use of a motor vehicle'.
In Case U107 87 ATC 650; AAT Case 75 18 ATR 3544, a ground maintenance engineer was allowed a deduction for the expense of transporting his tools to and from the airport on the grounds that the two substantial tool boxes were of such size and weight that they could not reasonably have been transported on public transport.
In Case N34 81 ATC 178, Board of Review Member Beck stated that for a deduction to be allowable for travel between home and work for transporting equipment, 'it must be shown that it is too heavy and/or too bulky for reasonable people to expect it to be carried by the taxpayer in public transport'.
These cases demonstrate that equipment will be considered bulky if it is too bulky to be reasonably expected to be transported on public transport.
In your case, you travel public transport between your home and the company pick up point.
Given that you transport your items of baggage each shift using public transport, it is clear that these items are not so bulky that they cannot be reasonably transported on public transport. Therefore, these items are not considered to be bulky for the purpose of claiming a deduction for travel between home and work.
Even if your items were considered to be bulky, when travelling by public transport, the cost of a ticket or fare is considered to be the expense enabling you to travel as a passenger. As a passenger, you are also entitled to carry a certain quantity of luggage with you. Your tools are hitching a ride with you and therefore you have not incurred any expenses in transporting the tools and the travel is considered private in nature.
Consequently you are not entitled to a deduction for your travel expenses under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
