Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012855010641

Date of advice: 6 August 2015

Ruling

Subject: Capital gains tax - main residence

Question 1:

Are you entitled to a full main residence exemption to disregard the capital gain made on the disposal of the dwelling?

Answer:

No.

Question 2:

Are you entitled to a partial main residence exemption to disregard the capital gain made on the disposal of the dwelling?

Answer:

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period

Income year ending 30 June 2016

The scheme commences on

1 July 2008

Relevant facts and circumstances

You and your family resided in the family's main residence (Family dwelling).

You and your spouse purchased a property (the property) with a dwelling (Dwelling A) located on it after 20 September 1985.

A second dwelling (Dwelling B) was built by your spouse on the property. The slab was poured in around 12 months after the property had been purchased, with the completion of Dwelling B occurring around four years after the property had been purchased.

You and your spouse separated around the time the construction of Dwelling B was completed.

You moved into the Dwelling B straight after the completion of the building of the dwelling.

The property was subdivided around six months after you had moved into Dwelling B which resulted in:

Dwelling A was disposed of in the same income year as the subdivision had occurred.

You continued to reside in Dwelling B for around twelve months until you moved into another dwelling (Dwelling C).

Dwelling C has been your "Common Law" main residence from the date you moved into it until the present date.

Dwelling B has not been used to earn assessable income. It has remained vacant since you moved out of it and is used occasionally by you.

For the purposes of this private ruling:

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 102-20

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-110

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-145

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-150

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-178

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-185

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 126-A

Reasons for decision

Capital gains tax

A capital gain or capital loss is made when a capital gains tax (CGT) event happens to a CGT asset you own.

The most common event is CGT event A1 which happens when a person disposes of their ownership interest in a CGT asset to someone else.

A capital gain is made if the amount received (called capital proceeds) from the disposal exceeds the cost base (the cost of the asset and certain other costs associated with acquiring, holding and disposing of the asset) of the CGT asset.

Subdivision of Land 

If a taxpayer subdivides a block of land, each block that results is registered with a separate title. For CGT purposes, the original land parcel is divided into two or more separate assets.

Subdividing land does not result in a CGT event if the taxpayer retains ownership of the subdivided blocks. Therefore, the taxpayer does not make a capital gain or a capital loss at the time of the subdivision.

Taxation Determination TD 97/3 provides that the Commissioner will accept any "reasonable" method of apportioning the original cost base between the new blocks.

A reasonable apportionment of the cost of the land itself can usually be achieved on an area basis if all the land is of a similar size and market value or on a relative market value basis if this is not the case.

However, expenditure forming part of the cost base of the asset is not apportioned if that amount is wholly attributable to a particular asset. For example, if a dwelling existed on an original block of land before it was subdivided into two blocks, the cost of the dwelling would only be included in the cost base of the block on which the dwelling stands. Further, the cost of connecting water, gas and/or electricity to the new block would not be apportioned over both blocks, as it is "wholly attributable" to the new block. Construction expenditure for the new dwelling would form part of the cost base of the block on which it stands (section 112-25 of the ITAA 1997).

If the blocks are of unequal market value the Commissioner considers that costs such as survey, legal fees and application fees associated with the subdivision should be apportioned in accordance with relative market values of the blocks.

Application to your situation

You and your spouse purchased a property with an existing dwelling located on it (Dwelling A). A new dwelling was built on the property (Dwelling B) and the property was subdivided resulting in two subdivided blocks, being:

As a result of the subdivision, you and your spouse each have a 50% ownership interest in Lot A and Lot B.

No CGT event occurred at the time of the subdivision because you and your spouse retained your ownership interest in both subdivided blocks. However, a CGT event occurred when Dwelling A had been disposed of, and will occur when Dwelling B is disposed of.

The original cost base of the property must be apportioned between the subdivided blocks on a reasonable basis. Any costs arising in relation to only one subdivided block can only be included in the cost base of that block. Such as the costs to build Dwelling B are only attributable to Lot B, and the costs of Dwelling A are only attributable to Lot A.

Full main residence exemption

Generally, you can ignore a capital gain or capital loss from a CGT event that happens to a dwelling that is your main residence.

However, in order to obtain a full exemption from CGT, the dwelling must have been your main residence for the entire period you owned it, must not have been used to produce assessable income and any land on which the dwelling is situated should not be more than two hectares.

For the purpose of the main residence exemption, you have an ownership interest in a dwelling from the date of settlement of the contract of purchase until the date of settlement of the contract of sale. This period is called your ownership period. 

If you own more than one dwelling during a particular period, only one of them can be your main residence at any one time except in limited circumstances when moving from one main residence to another.

Continuing main residence status during absence

In some cases you can continue to treat a dwelling as your main residence during periods of absence. That is, for periods when you no longer reside in the dwelling. If the dwelling is not used to produce income it can be treated as your main residence indefinitely.

If the dwelling is used to produce income the maximum period that you can choose to treat it as your main residence, while you use it for that purpose, is six years. You are entitled to another period of six years each time the dwelling again becomes your main residence and then commence using it again to produce income. If you make this choice, you cannot treat any other dwelling as your main residence while you apply this section.

If you own more than one dwelling, only one of them can be your main residence at any one time.

Moving from one main residence to another

If you acquire a new dwelling before you dispose of your old one, both dwellings are treated as your main residence for up to six months if:

Application to your situation

You and your spouse purchased the property on which Dwelling A was located. You and your spouse did not live in Dwelling A.

A second dwelling was built on the property, Dwelling B, and you commenced residing in Dwelling B after you and your spouse had separated.

The property was subdivided and as a result of the subdivision, you and your spouse each had a 50% ownership interest in both of the subdivided blocks, being Lot A, with Dwelling A located on it, and Lot B, with Dwelling B located on it. Dwelling A was disposed of in the same income year the subdivision had occurred.

Your spouse will transfer their 50% ownership interest in Dwelling B to you in accordance with a court order and the marriage breakdown roll-over will apply. It is expected that your divorce is expected to be finalised in early 20YY.

For CGT purposes, you are viewed as owning two interests in Dwelling B, the 50% ownership interest you acquired when the property was acquired, and the 50% interest you acquired you're your spouse.

You resided in Dwelling B for around 12 months until you moved into Dwelling C, which has continued to be your main residence until the present date. Dwelling C is your "Common Law" main residence from when you moved into that property.

As outlined above, if you own more than one dwelling, only one of them can be your main residence at any one time. Therefore, you chose not to make the absence choice in relation to Dwelling B for the same period of time that you are treating Dwelling C as your main residence for CGT purposes. Accordingly, you will not be able to make the absence choice in relation to Dwelling B for the period from when you moved out of Dwelling B, until the date settlement on the disposal of Dwelling B occurs.

We have also considered the exemption available for when you move main residences. However, as Dwelling C has been your main residence since you moved into that dwelling, and Dwelling B will not be your main residence for three months in the 12 months prior to it being disposed of, you do not meet the conditions for the exemption for moving from one main residence to another. Therefore, the moving from one main residence to another exemption will not apply in your situation.

After reviewing the application of the relevant exemptions to facts of your situation, we have determined that Dwelling B will not have been your main residence for all of your ownership period when you dispose of it in 20YY. Accordingly, you are not entitled to fully disregard the capital gain made on the disposal of Dwelling B.

Partial exemption on disposal of dwelling

When you are not able to fully disregard a capital gain or loss, you may be eligible to partially disregard it.

To calculate your capital gain or capital loss when the dwelling was only subject to a main residence exemption for some of the period of ownership, the following formula must be used:

Total capital gain X Non-main residence days

  Total days in your ownership

Where:

Application to your situation

In your case, while you are not entitled to a full main residence exemption on the disposal of Dwelling B, you will be entitled to a partial exemption.

As outlined above, for CGT purposes you are viewed as having two ownership interests (two CGT assets) in Dwelling B, your ownership interest in the property when it was originally acquired when the property was purchased, and your 50% interest that will be transferred to you by your spouse.

The capital gain made on the disposal of your ownership interests will be calculated as follows:

Further issues for you to consider

The following information is provided as written guidance. A taxpayer who relies on guidance will remain liable for any tax shortfall if the guidance is incorrect or misleading and they make a mistake as a result (unless a time limit imposed by the law precludes the liability). However, they will be protected against the shortfall penalty and interest on the tax shortfall provided they relied on that guidance reasonably and in good faith.

Constructing a Dwelling

If you build a dwelling on vacant land, you may choose to apply the main residence exemption for the shorter period of:

However, the taxpayer can make this choice only if the dwelling:

To further your understanding of this exemption, we have enclosed a copy of Taxation Determination TD 2000/16 Income tax: and capital gains tax: in what circumstances does subsection 118-150(5) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 modify the start of the period in paragraph 118-150(4)(b) for which you choose under subsection 118-150(2) to apply the main residence exemption in Subdivision 118-B?

The following two examples (modified from the Commissioner's views in TD 2000/16) illustrate circumstances in which the Commissioner believes the extension of time either will or will not apply.

Example 1:

Dwelling A is situated on land acquired by Prue. A tenant occupies dwelling A after acquisition. The land is subdivided and a separate dwelling (dwelling B) is built without demolishing dwelling A. In this situation, the Commissioner believes that subsection 118-150(5) of the ITAA 1997 will not allow an alteration to the start date for which the main residence exemption may be chosen under section 118-150 of the ITAA 1997 for dwelling B back to the time that the tenant ceased to occupy dwelling A if, for example, the tenant moved out during construction of dwelling B due to noise. Section 118-150 of the ITAA 1997 will apply to dwelling B only for the period from when the ownership interest in the land was acquired until B becomes the main residence.

Example 2:

Freeman acquires land with an existing dwelling and builds a separate dwelling on the land. The land is subdivided after construction commences on the new dwelling. The original dwelling is not demolished. The Commissioner believes the extension of time may be available in this situation.

In conclusion, making this choice would get you a partial main residence exemption on your original interest, but no exemption on the interest transferred from your spouse.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).