| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1012857393656
Date of advice: 13 August 2015
Ruling
Subject: Rental repairs
Question
Are you entitled to a deduction for the cost to relevelling to your rental property?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following period
Year ended 30 June 20YY
The scheme commences on
1 July 20XX
Relevant facts and circumstances
You have a rental property which has been rented since xxxx.
The property was flooded.
Subsequently, the doors and windows became hard to open and cracks appeared where the ceiling met the walls.
The previous tenants vacated the house.
You took the opportunity to engage a house leveller to look at the levels in the house.
The property suffered serious sinking of the stumps.
In order to rectify the damage, relevelling of the house by packing the tops of the stumps was required.
You incurred a cost of a few thousand dollars in relation to the relevelling of the rental property.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 25-10.
Reasons for decision
Section 25-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for the cost of repairs to premises used for income-producing purposes. However, subsection 25-10(3) of the ITAA 1997 does not allow a deduction for repairs where the expenditure is of a capital nature.
The word 'repair' is not defined within the taxation legislation. Taxation Ruling TR 97/23 states that the word 'repair' ordinarily means the remedying or making good of defects in, damage to, or deterioration of, property to be repaired (being defects, damage or deterioration in a mechanical and physical sense) and contemplates the continued existence of the property.
TR 97/23 indicates that expenditure for repairs to property is of a capital nature where the extent of the work carried out represents a renewal or reconstruction of the entirety. Paragraph 40 of TR 97/23 provides an example, stating that a roof is only part of a building and does not constitute an 'entirety'. The building itself is the 'entirety'.
In your case, you have owned the property for a number of years. You have relevelled the house in accordance with a house leveller's recommendations.
As your property is used for income producing purposes and the relevelling of the house by packing the tops of the stumps is not an initial repair, is not the replacement of an entirety and is not an improvement, a deduction is allowable.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
