Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012860583840

Date of advice: 14 August 2015

Ruling

Subject: Entity expenses - section 8-1 or 40-880 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Question 1

Are the expenses incurred by the entity deductible under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

No

Question 2

Are the expenses incurred by the entity deductible under section 40-880 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ended 30 June 2014

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2013

Relevant facts

The entity set out to establish a business.

Costs were incurred in relation to setting up the business.

All costs were required to test the feasibility of the location.

For reasons beyond the control of the entity the business was not able to proceed at the specific location so the entity stopped incurring any further expenses.

None of the expenses incurred were reimbursed or refunded.

After the first failed attempt to set up a clinic the entity subsequently continued to search for a new location for the business.

The entity found another site and commenced the business.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 40-880

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Subsection 8-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 states you can deduct from your assessable income any loss or outgoing to the extent that:

Subsection 8-1(2) of the ITAA 1997 states however, you cannot deduct a loss or outgoing under this section to the extent that:

It is important to characterise items of expenditure as being on either revenue or capital in nature as section 8-1 of ITAA 1997, the general deductibility provision, is still the source of most tax deductions. This provision only provides a deduction for losses or outgoings of a revenue nature.

When considering whether the nature of expenditure is revenue or capital, based on the principles of a case authority (Sun Newspapers Ltd v FCT (1938) 61 CLR 337) the following matters should be considered:

An expense will usually be capital in nature where it is incurred with the intention to create an asset or advantage of a lasting and enduring nature (British Insulated & Helsby Cables Ltd v. Atherton (1926) AC 205; (1926) 10 TC 155).

Capital expenditure often produces an enduring benefit, that is, the structure of the advantage or asset.

Revenue expenditure is often repetitious or recurring in nature and often does not produce assets or advantages of an enduring nature.

In this case the amounts paid in order to establish the business were expended to create an asset of a lasting and enduring nature, i.e. the business, therefore the expenses incurred are considered capital in nature and not deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.

Question 2

Subsection 40-880(1) of ITAA 1997 states the object of this section is to make certain business capital expenditure deductible over 5 years if:

40-880(2)  

Limitations and exceptions

40-880(3)  

You can only deduct the expenditure, for a business that you carry on, used to carry on or propose to carry on, to the extent that the business is carried on, was carried on or is proposed to be carried on for a taxable purpose.

40-880(4)  

You can only deduct the expenditure, for a business that another entity used to carry on or proposes to carry on, to the extent that:

(ii) the business that was carried on or is proposed to be carried on.

40-880(5)  

You cannot deduct anything under this section for an amount of expenditure you incur to the extent that:

40-880(6)  

The exceptions in paragraphs (5)(d) and (f) do not apply to expenditure you incur to preserve (but not enhance) the value of goodwill if the expenditure you incur is in relation to a legal or equitable right and the value to you of the right is solely attributable to the effect that the right has on goodwill.

40-880(7)  

You cannot deduct an amount under paragraph (2)(c) in relation to a business proposed to be carried on unless, having regard to any relevant circumstances, it is reasonable to conclude that the business is proposed to be carried on within a reasonable time.

40-880(8)  

You cannot deduct anything under this section for an amount of expenditure that, because of a market value substitution rule, was excluded from the cost of a depreciating asset or the cost base or reduced cost base of a CGT asset.

40-880(9)  

You cannot deduct anything under this section for an amount of expenditure you incur:

In relation to this case the entity incurred expenses in order to start a business. This amount is considered capital and to be in relation to the entity's business. The business was to be conducted for a taxable purpose. None of the exceptions under sections 40-880(3) to 40-880(9) apply.

The entity is therefore entitled to claim a deduction for all expenses incurred in relation to the attempt to set up the business under section 40-880 of the ITAA 1997.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).