Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012880583606

Date of advice: 19 May 2016

Ruling

Subject: CGT- Foreign shares

Question 1

Will the transfer of Foreign Company A shares from Australian Company B to Foreign Partnership C be disregarded under the single entity rule (SER) contained in section 701-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and accordingly not give rise to a CGT event?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Is Foreign LLP Partnership D a foreign hybrid company? Will the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) and ITAA 1997 apply as if Foreign LLP Partnership D is a partnership?

Answer

Yes

Question 3

Is Foreign LLP Partnership D a subsidiary member of the Head Company Tax Consolidated Group (Head Company-TCG) for the purposes of section 701-1 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes

Question 4

Will interest income derived by Foreign LLC Company E in connection with the Loans be foreign income of the Head Company-TCG as defined in section 6AB and subsection 23AH(15) of the ITAA 1936?

Answer

Yes

Question 5

Will interest income derived by Foreign LLP Partnership D in connection with the Foreign LLP Partnership D investments be foreign income of the Head Company-TCG as defined in section 6AB and subsection 23AH(15) of the ITAA 1936?

Answer

Yes

Question 6

Will services income derived by Foreign Partnership C pursuant to the Foreign Partnership C services agreements be foreign income of the Head Company-TCG as defined in section 6AB and subsection 23AH(15) of the ITAA 1936?

Answer

Yes

Question 7

Will the Head Company-TCG have a single permanent establishment (the "PE of the MGL-TCG") comprising of the permanent establishments of Australian Company F, Foreign LLC Company E, Foreign Partnership C and Foreign LLP Partnership D?

Answer

Yes

Question 8

Will the income derived in Questions 4, 5 and 6 be treated as having been derived in carrying on a business at or through the PE of the Head Company-TCG?

Answer

Yes

Question 9

Will the income referred to in Question 8 be NANE income of the Head Company-TCG pursuant to the operation of subsection 23AH(2) of the ITAA 1936 with the exclusion in subsection 23AH(5) of the ITAA 1936 having no application?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

October 20xx to September 20xx

October 20xx to September 20xx

October 20xx to March 20xx

April 20xx to March 20xx

April 20xx to March 20xx

April 20xx to March 20xx

April 20xx to March 20xx

The scheme commences on:

August 20xx

Relevant facts and circumstances

Australian group operating a permanent establishment and restructuring its offshore subsidiaries that include foreign hybrid companies and partnerships.

Foreign Company A's sole member was Australian Company B.

Foreign Partnership C's members are Australian Company B and Foreign LLC Company E.

Foreign LLP Partnership D's members are Australian Company B and Foreign LLC Company E.

Foreign LLC Company E's sole member is Australian Company B.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 6AB,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 23AH,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 701-1,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 703-15

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 830-15, and

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 830-20.

Reasons for decision

Summary

The transfer of Foreign Company A shares from Australian Company B to Foreign Partnership C will be disregarded under the single entity rule (SER) contained in section 701-1 of the ITAA 1997 and accordingly will not give rise to a CGT event.

Detailed reasoning

The SER in section 701-1 of the ITAA 1997 provides that:

Head company core purposes

Entity core purposes

The transfer of the Foreign Company A shares from Australian Company B to Foreign Partnership C was by agreement. In this case Australian Company B and Foreign Partnership C were at all material times, members of the same tax consolidated group (Head Company-TCG).

Consequently the transfer of the Foreign Company A shares from Australian Company B to Foreign Partnership C is not treated for income tax purposes as a disposal or acquisition in the hands of the Head Company-TCG. Although the legal transfer of the CGT asset between Australian Company B and Foreign Partnership C occurred at general law, it has no income tax consequences as the Head Company-TCG is taken to have been the owner of the Foreign Company A shares both before and after the transfer.

Consequently no CGT event occurred on the transfer of the Foreign Company A shares from Australian Company B to Foreign Partnership C.

Question 2

Summary

Foreign LLP Partnership D is a foreign hybrid company under Division 830 of the ITAA 1997, and the ITAA 1936 and ITAA 1997 will apply as if Foreign LLP Partnership D is a partnership.

Detailed reasoning

Foreign LLP Partnership D was incorporated as a LLP.

Foreign hybrid company is defined in section 830-15 of the ITAA 1997. A company will be a foreign hybrid company in relation to an income year if it satisfies the requirements set out in subsection 830-15(1) of the ITAA 1997.

In relation to paragraph 830-15(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 Foreign LLP Partnership D must also satisfy subsection 830-15(3) of the ITAA 1997 which deals with partnership treatment requirements relating to any foreign country.

Having satisfied all the requirements Foreign LLP Partnership D will be a foreign hybrid company and pursuant to section 830-20 will be treated as a partnership for the purposes of the ITAA 1936 and the ITAA 1997.

Question 3

Summary

Foreign LLP Partnership D is a subsidiary member of the Head Company-TCG.

Detailed reasoning

Foreign LLP Partnership D, being treated as a partnership for Australian income tax purposes, pursuant to section 830-20 of the ITAA 1997, satisfies the requirements in columns 2, 3 and 4 of item 2 of the table in subsection 703-15(2) of the ITAA 1997 and is therefore a subsidiary member of the Head Company-TCG. See also ATO ID 2009/149.

All the membership interests in Foreign LLP Partnership D are owned by entities who are also subsidiary members of the Head Company-TCG.

Question 4

Summary

The interest income derived by Foreign LLC Company E in connection with the loans will be foreign income of the Head Company-TCG as defined in section 6AB and subsection 23AH(15) of the ITAA 1936.

Detailed reasoning

Foreign LLC Company E is a LLC and is treated as a partnership for Australian income tax purposes pursuant to section 830-20 of the ITAA 1997 and a member of the Head Company-TCG.

In December 20xx, Foreign LLC Company E acquired the loans.

The term 'foreign income' is defined in subsection 6AB(1) of the ITAA 1936 as follows:

In accordance with Taxation Ruling 2005/2 the reference to 'income' in the definition is to be interpreted broadly to include both income according to ordinary concepts (whether assessable or not) and amounts included in assessable income under a statutory provision.

Foreign Income is also defined in subsection 23AH(15) to include an amount that:

In Australia, the source of interest is to be ascertained by reference to a range of factors. In FCT v Spotless Services Ltd (1995) 62 FCR 2 it was held that the most significant factors are:

Subject to specific statutory provisions, the source of interest income is determined according to the general principle set out by Isaacs J in Nathan v FCT (1918) 25 CLR 183. This general principle is that in determining the source of interest income each case must be looked at on its own facts, and the source is determined as a "practical, hard matter of fact".

Foreign LLC Company E has assumed all creditor rights under each of the Loan agreements, and so Foreign LLC Company E should be respected as the owner of the Loans. As such, Foreign LLC Company E should be viewed as deriving the interest on the Loans paid by the borrowers under the facilities.

The following factors are those which the Commissioner considers relevant to determining the source of the interest income on the loans:

Based on these factors the Commissioner considers that the interest income derived by Foreign LLC Company E in connection with the Loans is foreign income as defined in Section 6AB of the ITAA 1936.

Question 5

Summary

Interest income derived by Foreign LLP Partnership D in connection with the Foreign LLP Partnership D investments will be foreign income of the Head Company-TCG as defined in section 6AB and subsection 23AH(15) of the ITAA 1936.

Detailed reasoning

Foreign LLP Partnership D was incorporated as a LLP under and treated as a partnership for Australian income tax purposes and a subsidiary member of the Head Company-TCG. Foreign LLP Partnership D carries on an investment business involving the making of loans to affiliates.

The term 'foreign income' is defined in subsection 6AB(1) of the ITAA 1936 as follows:

In accordance with Taxation Ruling 2005/2 the reference to 'income' in the definition is to be interpreted broadly to include both income according to ordinary concepts (whether assessable or not) and amounts included in assessable income under a statutory provision.

Foreign Income is also defined in subsection 23AH(15) to include an amount that:

In Australia, the source of interest is to be ascertained by reference to a range of factors. In FCT v Spotless Services Ltd (1995) 62 FCR 2 it was held that the most significant factors are:

Subject to specific statutory provisions, the source of interest income is determined according to the general principle set out by Isaacs J in Nathan v FCT (1918) 25 CLR 183. This general principle is that in determining the source of interest income each case must be looked at on its own facts, and the source is determined as a "practical, hard matter of fact".

The following factors are those which the Commissioner considers relevant to determining the source of the interest income on the Foreign LLP Partnership D investments

Based on these factors the Commissioner considers that the interest income derived by Foreign LLP Partnership D in connection with the Foreign LLP Partnership D investments is foreign income as defined in section 6AB of the ITAA 1936.

Question 6

Summary

Services income derived by Foreign Partnership C pursuant to the Foreign Partnership C Services Agreements will be 'foreign income' of the Head Company-TCG as defined in section 6AB and sunsection 23AH(15) of the ITAA 1936.

Detailed reasoning

Foreign Partnership C was established as a general partnership and a member of the Head Company-TCG. Foreign Partnership C carried on a business consisting of the provision of contract services to affiliate companies.

The term 'foreign income' is defined in subsection 6AB(1) of the ITAA 1936 as follows:

In accordance with Taxation Ruling 2005/2 the reference to 'income' in the definition is to be interpreted broadly to include both income according to ordinary concepts (whether assessable or not) and amounts included in assessable income under a statutory provision.

Foreign Income is also defined in subsection 23AH(15) as an amount that:

Income from personal services in a conventional employer/employee relationship would ordinarily have its source in the place in which the services are performed (FCT v French (1957) 98 CLR 398; 7 AITR 76; 11 ATD 288). However, other considerations may apply in cases where special skills or creative talents are being exercised (FCT v Mitchum (1965) 113 CLR 401; 9 AITR 559) where the remuneration consists of directors' fees or where independent personal services are being rendered. In such cases, factors such as the place of negotiation and conclusion of the contract and the place of payment will be relatively more important.

The income of Foreign Partnership C will have a source outside of Australia as all of the relevant activities are undertaken offshore (by the offshore Staff) and the Services Business contracts are executed offshore.

Accordingly services income derived by Foreign Partnership C pursuant to the Foreign Partnership C Services Agreement should be foreign income as defined in section 6AB of the ITAA 1936.

Question 7

Summary

The Head Company-TCG will have a single permanent establishment (the "PE of the Head Company-TCG") comprising of the permanent establishments of Australian Company F, Foreign LLC Company E, Foreign Partnership C and Foreign LLP Partnership D.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 23AH(15) of the ITAA 1936 provides as follows:

As there is a double tax agreement between Australia and the offshore PE country, the term "PE" is to be interpreted in accordance with the definition contained in the double taxation convention.

As a result the activities of Australian Company F, Foreign LLC Company E, Foreign Partnership C and Foreign LLP Partnership D conducted at the relevant space, the space will give rise to a permanent establishment for the Head Company-TCG.

Although each entity carries on a unique business, they operate from the same space and each of these businesses form's part of the broader business. In addition to this each entity is a member of the Head Company-TCG for Australian tax purposes. Finally it is also noted that all board meetings are conducted through the same designated location.

As a result, the activities of each entity should be construed as part of a coherent commercial whole at a singular place and should therefore be attributable to a single PE of the Head Company-TCG.

Question 8

Summary

The income derived in Questions 4, 5 and 6 will be treated as having been derived in carrying on a business at or through the PE of the Head Company-TCG.

Detailed reasoning

The permanent establishments of Australian Company F, Foreign LLC Company E, Foreign Partnership C and Foreign LLP Partnership D give rise to a single permanent establishment of the Head Company-TCG. In order for section 23AH of the ITAA 1936 to apply, income must be derived in carrying on business at or through a permanent establishment.

The interest income derived by Foreign LLC Company E in connection with the loans, the interest income derived by Foreign LLP Partnership D in connection with the Foreign LLP Partnership D Investments and the services income derived by Foreign Partnership C pursuant to the Foreign Partnership C Services Agreements will constitute the carrying on of a business and will be attributable to the PE of the Head Company-TCG.

Question 9

Summary

The income referred to above in Question 8 will be NANE income of the Head Company-TCG pursuant to the operation of subsection 23AH(2) of the ITAA 1936 and the exclusion in subsection 23AH(5) will have no application.

Detailed reasoning

As outlined above the income addressed in Questions 4, 5 and 6 constitute foreign income derived by the Head Company-TCG in carrying on business at or through a PE.

Subsection 23AH(2) of the ITAA 1936 provides that:

As such, subsection 23AH(2) of the ITAA 1936 applies to treat the income addressed in Questions 4, 5 and 6 as NANE income of the Head Company-TCG for Australian taxation purposes.

For completeness it is noted that as none of the relevant income derived will be Eligible Designated Concession Income within the meaning of Section 317 of the ITAA 1936, the exclusion in subsection (5) of section 23AH of the ITAA 1936 should have no application.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).