Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012914487897

Date of advice: 20 November 2015

Ruling

Subject: Sovereign Immunity

Question 1

Is the agent of the entity immune from income tax or withholding tax on interest income, dividend income, rental income, trust distributions, capital gain distributions, managed investment trust distributions and any other income derived from its direct investment in the assets under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods

Year ending 30 June 2016

Year ending 30 June 2017

Year ending 30 June 2018

Year ending 30 June 2019

Year ending 30 June 2020

Year ending 30 June 2021

Year ending 30 June 2022

Year ending 30 June 2023

Year ending 30 June 2024

Year ending 30 June 2025

The scheme commences on

During the year ending 30 June 2016.

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Investment Manager

The Investment Fund

Aggregator Vehicles

The Investment

The Direct Interest

The Investment Fund Interest

The Co-Investment Interest

Combined Interest

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 128 B

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 4-1.

Reasons for decision

Non-resident taxpayers will generally be liable to pay income tax under section 4-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA1997) or withholding tax under section 128B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA1936) on Australian-sourced income, unless an exemption or exclusion applies.

While the taxation legislation does not provide any relevant exemption or exclusion for an entity, it is accepted in certain circumstances that liability to income tax and withholding tax will not be imposed on foreign governments or foreign government agencies under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity.

Sovereign Immunity

For Australian income tax and withholding tax purposes it is accepted that the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies to a foreign government or an agency of a foreign government that engages in governmental functions. This approach is consistent with the decision of the British House of Lords in the case I Congreso del Partido [1981] 2 All ER 1064 which held that activities of a trading, commercial or other private law character were not governmental functions.

In determining whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies to Australian income tax and/or withholding tax, it is necessary to establish the following:

If these three conditions are satisfied, then the income or gains will not be subject to Australian income tax and/or withholding tax.

Condition 1: Foreign state or an agency of a foreign state

The entity forms part of a foreign government and is responsible for managing economic policy, finances, fiscal strategies and tax system.

The agent is a wholly owned agent of the entity and was established to manage assets entrusted by the Government and national bank. It was established by legislative enactment and acts as trustee of the Assets beneficially for the entity under an investment management agreement (IMA).

Accordingly, it is accepted that the entity is a foreign government and the agent is an agency of a foreign government.

Therefore this condition is satisfied.

Condition 2: Monies are and will remain government monies

In line with the principle that sovereign immunity applies to foreign states performing only governmental functions, an entity claiming sovereign immunity must establish that the monies being invested are and will remain government monies.

The agent manages the Assets for the entity and is the legal owner of the Assets while the entity is beneficial owner.

Profits from management of the Assets by the agent shall belong to the entity, including all income and gains derived from the entrusted assets including interest, dividends, fund payments, capital gains and foreign exchange gains.

The Assets managed by the agent on behalf of the entity must be accounted for separately from any assets held in its own right or which have been entrusted to it by other government ministries and agencies.

Under the IMA, the entity may demand payment of the profits from management of the Assets by giving prior notice. If no such demand is made, these profits are to be reinvested on behalf of the entity.

Accordingly, the monies that are invested by the agent for the benefit of the entity are and will remain government monies.

Therefore this condition is satisfied.

Condition 3: Non- commercial transaction

Whether an operation or activity is a commercial transaction will depend on the facts of each case.

As a guide, a commercial transaction is generally considered to be an activity concerned with the trading of goods and services, such as buying, selling, bartering, transportation, and includes the carrying on of a business.

In relation to the ownership of shares in a company or other similar equity interests, there would be instances where the extent of the holding gives rise to questions as to whether the interests constitute a passive investment or a commercial investment. A determination of commerciality will depend on the particular circumstances.

Importantly, consideration will be given to factors relating to the influence and control, particularly in relation to day to day management and key business, strategy and financial decisions that are exercised by the investor in relation to the acquired company or similar equity investment.

Is the agent's direct investment in the underlying entities a commercial transaction?

It is proposed that the agent will have a X% direct interest in the underlying asset entities.

The agent has discretion to make the decision to enter this investment and once made it will enter into the IMA with the Investment Manager to manage the interest.

As part of the IMA and the Securityholders' Agreement, the agent is provided with the right to at least one voting seat on the Board of Directors of the trustee companies for the underlying asset entities. However the agent will not exercise any board appointment rights in respect of Directors of the trustees of the trustee companies for the underlying asset entities.

In addition, under the Securityholders' Agreement, the Investment Manager has a right to appoint additional directors in the event that the agent does not take up its entitlement to appoint directors.  The Investment Manager will not exercise its right to appoint such additional directors in relation to the agent's interest in the underlying asset entities.

As part of the Securityholders' Agreement, the agent is provided with other Board and securityholder voting rights at different levels of A%, B% and C% for different specified matters.

The subsidiary will only exercise securityholder voting rights in respect of the matters listed in the Securityholders' Agreement requiring C% of the votes entitled to be cast for the proposed decision or resolution. The matters requiring C% securityholder support are securityholder protection issues, including any changes to a constituent document, any changes to the rights attached to shares and any changes to the fundamental nature of the business carried out by the underlying asset entities. These matters do not provide the subsidiary with any day to day operational control. These matters do not impact on the management and conduct of the underlying asset entities.

The agent will not, either directly or indirectly, have any involvement in the management and conduct of the underlying asset business.

From the above, it is evident that the agent will not exercise any control or influence on the day to day management of the underlying asset entities. It is also evident that the agent will not exercise control or influence over strategic and financial decisions relating to the underlying asset entities.

Accordingly, the direct X% investment by the entity through the agent into the underlying asset entities will constitute a passive and non-commercial activity.

This direct investment is in addition to the two other indirect investments into underlying asset entities by the subsidiary via the Investment Fund Interest and the Co-investment Interest. These indirect interests will raise the agent's total investment to between E% and F%. However it is accepted that this does not change the passive and non-commercial nature of the agent's direct investment in the underlying asset entities.

Therefore this condition is satisfied.

Conclusion

As the three conditions have been satisfied, the agent will be immune from income tax or withholding tax with respect to income derived from the direct X% investment in the underlying asset entities under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).