Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1012940349973

Date of advice: 21 January 2016

Ruling

Subject: Native Title Benefit

Question 1

Is the BDBT Payment derived by the BDBT in the Relevant Year the Ordinary Income or the Statutory Income of the BDBT such that the BDBT Payment is required to be included in the BDBT's Assessable Income or net income (as that term is defined in section 95(1) of the ITAA36) in the Relevant Year?

Answer

No

Question 2

Is the YBDBT Payment derived by the YBDBT in the Relevant Year the Ordinary Income or the Statutory Income of the YBDBT such that the YBDBT Payment is required to be included in the YBDBT's Assessable Income or net income (as that term is defined in section 95(1) of the ITAA36) in the Relevant Year?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ending 30 June 2015

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2014

Relevant facts and circumstances

You have provided copies of the following documents, which should be read in conjunction with, and form part of the scheme of this private ruling

The Private Ruling Application outlines that;

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 59-50

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 6-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 95(1)

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Is the Payment derived by the XY Trust in the Relevant Year the Ordinary Income or the Statutory Income of the XY Trust , such that the Payment is required to be included in the XY Trust's Assessable Income or net income (as that term is defined in section 95(1) of the ITAA36) in the Relevant Year?

Under subsection 59-50(1) of the ITAA 1997 to the extent that a native title benefit would otherwise be included in your assessable income, it is not assessable income and is not exempt income if you are an Indigenous holding entity.

Based on the facts provided, we consider that the Payment constitutes a "native title benefit" (defined under section 59-50(5) of the ITAA 1997). The XY Trust is also considered to be an "Indigenous holding entity" (defined under section 59-50(6) of the ITAA 1997)

Meaning of Native Title Benefit

The Explanatory Material to the Native Title Exposure Draft explains at [1.16] that the definition of Native Title Benefit (in section 59-50(5) of the ITAA 1997) covers agreements under Australian legislation that provide payments for an action affecting native title. An action affecting native title is one that extinguishes native title rights and interests or is otherwise wholly or partly inconsistent with their continued existence, enjoyment and exercise.

Subsection 59-50(5) of the ITAA 1997 defines the term 'native title benefit':

Meaning of Indigenous holding entity

An indigenous holding entity is defined in section 59-50(6) as (a) a distributing body; or (b) a trust, if the beneficiaries of the trust can only be Indigenous persons or distributing bodies; or (c) a registered charity.

The XY Trust satisfies the definition of an Indigenous holding entity. Furthermore, The XY People satisfy the definition of 'Indigenous person' under section 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Application to your situation

The XY People are registered claimants under the Native Title Act (NTA). They have entered into various agreements with the mining company over a number of years. As outlined in the facts, whilst there have been changes to the details of the claims, the XY People have continued to be a party to a registered claim.

The XY People were to receive certain amounts pursuant to the Initial Agreement (which is considered to be an ancillary agreement). The payments under the Initial Agreement were not paid out (as was intended) but were set aside in a bank account, while issues pertaining to the claimants were resolved.

The amounts that had been set aside are now being paid out pursuant to a new agreement, which we accept is an ancillary agreement. Therefore, these payments satisfy the definition of being "native title benefits". The XY trust was established to receive these native title benefit payments on behalf of the XY People. The amounts would be constructively derived by the trusts, accordingly they would not represent ordinary income of the trusts. Rather it is Non Assessable, Non Exempt (NANE income)

Non-Assessable Non Exempt Native Title Benefits is covered under Section 59-50 of the ITAA 1997. Subsection 59-50(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that;

To the extent that an amount, or other benefit, arising directly or indirectly from a native title benefit would otherwise be included in your assessable income, it is not assessable income and is not exempt income if you are an Indigenous person or an Indigenous holding entity.

Therefore, the Payment derived by the XY Trust is neither the Ordinary Income nor the Statutory Income of the XY Trust, therefore the Payment is not required to be included in the XY Trust's Assessable Income or net income in the income year ending 30 June 2015.

Question 2

Is the Payment derived by the XYZ Trust in the Relevant Year the Ordinary Income or the Statutory Income of the XYZ Trust, such that the Payment is required to be included in the XYZ Trust's Assessable Income or net income (as that term is defined in section 95(1) of the ITAA36) in the Relevant Year?

Under subsection 59-50(1) of the ITAA 1997 to the extent that a native title benefit would otherwise be included in your assessable income, it is not assessable income and is not exempt income if you are an Indigenous holding entity.

Based on the facts provided, we consider that the Payment constitutes a "native title benefit" (defined under section 59-50(5) of the ITAA 1997). The XYZ Trust is also considered to be an "Indigenous holding entity" (defined under section 59-50(6) of the ITAA 1997)

Meaning of Native Title Benefit

The Explanatory Material to the Native Title Exposure Draft explains at [1.16] that the definition of Native Title Benefit (in section 59-50(5) of the ITAA 1997) covers agreements under Australian legislation that provide payments for an action affecting native title. An action affecting native title is one that extinguishes native title rights and interests or is otherwise wholly or partly inconsistent with their continued existence, enjoyment and exercise.

Subsection 59-50(5) of the ITAA 1997 defines the term 'native title benefit':

Meaning of Indigenous holding entity

An indigenous holding entity is defined in section 59-50(6) as (a) a distributing body; or (b) a trust, if the beneficiaries of the trust can only be Indigenous persons or distributing bodies; or (c) a registered charity.

The XYZ Trust satisfies the definition of an Indigenous holding entity. Furthermore, The XY People satisfy the definition of 'Indigenous person' under section 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Application to your situation

The XY People are registered claimants under the Native Title Act (NTA). They have entered into various agreements with the mining company over a number of years. As outlined in the facts, whilst there have been changes to the details of the claims, the XY People have continued to be a party to a registered claim.

The XY People were to receive certain amounts pursuant to the Initial Agreement (which is considered to be an ancillary agreement). The payments under the Initial Agreement were not paid out (as was intended) but were set aside in a bank account, while issues pertaining to the claimants were resolved.

The amounts that had been set aside are now being paid out pursuant to a new agreement, which we accept is an ancillary agreement. Therefore, these payments satisfy the definition of being "native title benefits". The XYZ trust was established to receive these native title benefit payments on behalf of the XY People. The amounts would be constructively derived by the trusts, accordingly they would not represent ordinary income of the trusts. Rather it is Non Assessable, Non Exempt (NANE income).

Non-Assessable Non Exempt Native Title Benefits is covered under Section 59-50 of the ITAA 1997. Subsection 59-50(1) of the ITAA 1997 states that;

To the extent that an amount, or other benefit, arising directly or indirectly from a native title benefit would otherwise be included in your assessable income, it is not assessable income and is not exempt income if you are an Indigenous person or an Indigenous holding entity.

Therefore, the Payment derived by the XYZ Trust is neither the Ordinary Income nor the Statutory Income of the XYZ Trust, therefore the Payment is not required to be included in the XYZ Trust's Assessable Income or net income in the income year ending 30 June 2015.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).