Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1013008912651

Date of advice: 6 May 2016

Ruling

Subject: Sovereign Immunity

Question

Is non-resident entity C immune from income tax or withholding tax on income derived from its investments into debt instruments under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 31 December 2015

Year ended 31 December 2016

Year ended 31 December 2017

Year ended 31 December 2018

Year ended 31 December 2019

The scheme commenced on:

31 December 2015

Relevant facts and circumstances

Non-resident entity A

Non-resident entity B

Non-resident entity C

Proposed investments to be held by non-resident entity C

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 128B

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 4-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 995-1

Reasons for decision

For Australian income tax and withholding tax purposes it is accepted that the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies to a foreign government or an agency of a foreign government that engages in governmental functions. This approach is consistent with the decision of the British House of Lords in the case I Congreso del Partido [1981] 2 All ER 1064 which held that activities of a trading, commercial or other private law character were not governmental functions.

In determining whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies to exempt Australian sourced income and gains from Australian income tax and/or withholding tax, it is necessary to establish the following:

If these three conditions are satisfied, then the income or gains will not be subject to Australian income tax and/or withholding tax.

Condition 1: that the person making the investment (and therefore deriving the income) is a foreign government or agency of a foreign government

Non-resident entity A is an agency of a foreign government because;

Non-resident entity B is a wholly owned subsidiary of non-resident entity A. It acts only as an investment vehicle for non-resident entity A. Its board of directors is appointed by non-resident entity A and it is required to conduct its activities in a manner consistent with the objectives of non-resident entity A. It therefore also satisfies this condition.

Non-resident entity C is a limited partnership where non-resident entity B is the sole Limited Partner. Non-resident entity C is subject to non-resident entity B's supervision. It is an agency of a foreign government because;

Condition 2: Monies are and will remain government monies

In line with the principle that sovereign immunity applies to foreign states performing only governmental functions, a non-resident entity claiming sovereign immunity must establish that the monies being invested are and will remain government monies.

The monies that are invested by non-resident entity C, are and will remain government monies. The funds used for investment are provided to non-resident entity C by a foreign government via non-resident entities A and B, who may request a withdrawal of funds at any time for the foreign government's purposes.

Condition 3: Non-commercial transaction

Income derived by a foreign government or by any other body exercising governmental functions from interest bearing investments or investments in equities is generally not considered to be income derived from a commercial operation or activity. However, in relation to the holding of shares in a company, or units in a unit trust, the extent of the relevant holding may give rise to questions as to whether it constitutes a commercial activity including the carrying on of a business. For foreign government bodies deriving income from interest bearing investments, the nature of the activities may be such as to constitute a money-lending business and thus a commercial activity.

In determining whether non-resident entity C's investments constitute non-commercial activity, it is necessary to consider the nature of its investments including the extent of its holdings, and the degree of its actual or potential influence in respect of the financial, operating and policy decisions of any entity related to the investments.

Are non-resident entity C's investments commercial transactions?

Non-resident entity C is proposing to invest in a variety of debt instruments issued by infrastructure entities, including hybrid securities.

The factors relevant to determining whether these proposed investments are reflective of a commercial transaction are as follows:

The above factors indicate that non-resident entity C's proposed investments into debt instruments will be passive investments, and therefore non-commercial activities, satisfying this condition.

Conclusion

As the three conditions have been satisfied, non-resident entity C will be immune from income tax or withholding tax with respect to income derived from its investments into debt instruments under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).