Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1013037438702

Date of advice: 24 June 2016

Ruling

Subject: Is the trust resettled and is the deed of exclusion and variation considered an irrevocable trust

Question 1

Will the exclusion of the Settlor (and any children of the settlor until they reach 18 years of age) of the Trust as a beneficiary of the trust cause CGT event E1, E2 or any other CGT event to happen?

Answer

No

Question 2

Subject to the express exclusion of the Settlor (and any children of the settlor until they reach 18 years of age) of the Trust, will the Trust be deemed to be an irrevocable trust with effect from the date of the variation under section 102 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods

Year ended 30 June 2015

Year ending 30 June 2016

Year ending 30 June 2017

The scheme commenced on

1 July 2014

Relevant facts and circumstances

A company was appointed as trustee (trustee).

The trust was established.

The settlor paid the settlement sum.

Assets were held by the trustee.

The schedule to the trust deed named specified beneficiaries.

The settlor was erroneously included in the list of specified beneficiaries of the trust.

Trustee power to remove a beneficiary

The trust deed at clause 3(3) states:

Trustee's power to vary the Trust Deed

The trust deed at clause 10 provides:

Beneficiaries

Clause 3(2)(a) provides that a natural person who is not a beneficiary under cl 3(1) may become a beneficiary, other than a default beneficiary, where the trustee with the consent of the Appointor in writing so determines and appoints, provided that any such appointment shall not be contrary to any express provision of this deed and neither the Settlor, the trustee for the time being, a former trustee or any person whose appointment would result in infringement of any rule or law against perpetuities or vesting which may apply to the Trust shall be appointed as a beneficiary.

The Appointer has given consent for the Trustee to vary the trust deed.

The specified beneficiary and settlor does not have a vested interest nor are they absolutely entitled to either the income or capital of the trust.

The settlor has never received a distribution from the trust.

A Deed of exclusion and variation has been drafted and states the trustee declares that the excluded beneficiary is permanently and irrevocably excluded as a beneficiary of the trust with effect from the date of this deed pursuant to clause 3(a)(ii) of the Trust deed.

Provisions relating the trustee

Clause 8(1)(a) states notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this deed (but subject to sub-cl.(b)), income or capital of the Trust, other than remuneration permitted under cl 8(2), shall not, in any circumstances, be paid, lent or transferred beneficially to, or applied for the benefit of the trustee, the Settlor or any claiming under or in right of the Settlor. Subject to sub-cl (b), discretion or power hereby conferred shall be exercised, or be capable of being exercised, and no provision of this deed operate so as to confer, or be capable of conferring, any direct or indirect benefit in or out of the Trust to any such person.

Clause 8(1)(b) states where a trustee, other than a corporate body in which the Settlor may hold an interest, is named or described in the Schedule as a General Beneficiary or a Specified Beneficiary, the trustee may exercise any of its powers or discretions under this deed in favour of such beneficiary and sub-cl(a) shall not apply to such beneficiary.

Clause (2)(a) states the trustee, other than a corporate body in which the Settlor may hold an interest, shall if the trustee so requires be entitled by way of remuneration of the trustee's services to such sum out of the income or capital of the trust fund, where by way of periodical fee, salary, commission or otherwise, as shall not exceed fees charged by the Public Trustee of the state or territory stipulated in the Schedule (or any person succeeding to or substantially taking over the functions of the same), in acting as trustee of an inter vivos trust if it were to carry out or perform duties similar to those performed by the trustee.

Relevant legislative provisions

Section 104-55 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Section 104-60 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Reasons for decision

Question 1

A trust resettlement will occur for income tax purposes where one trust estate has ended and another has replaced it. The effect of such a resettlement is that a disposal of the trust assets is deemed to occur. In consequence, capital gains could accrue to beneficiaries as a result of various CGT events.

The Commissioner has released Taxation Determination TD 2012/21 which was published as a result of the court case CoT v. Clark [2011] FCAFC 5; 2011 ATC 20-236; (2011) 79 ATR 550 (Clark's case). Whilst Clark's case dealt with whether changes in a continuing trust were sufficient to treat that trust as a different taxpayer for the purpose of applying relevant losses, TD 2012/21 accepts that the principles set out in Clark's case have broader application.

TD 2012/21 states that a valid amendment to a trust pursuant to an existing power will not result in CGT event E1 or CGT event E2 happening unless:

The Trust Deed in question allows for the Trustee to amend the deed and in this case it is accepted that neither of the two exclusions mentioned above apply. Consequently, neither CGT event E1 nor CGT event E2 arises in relation to the change proposed. No other CGT events are considered to arise.

Question 2

Subsection 102(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) states where a person has created a trust in respect of any income or property (including money) and:

the Commissioner may assess the trustee to pay income tax, under this section, and the trustee shall be liable to pay the tax so assessed.

In this case a person created the trust as settlor. After the Deed of exclusion and variation comes into effect the settlor will no longer be a beneficiary of the trust. After the Deed of exclusion and variation comes into effect the settlor will not have any power to revoke or alter the trust so as to acquire a beneficial interest in the income derived by the trustee or the property producing that income or any part of that income or property nor will income under the trust be payable to or accumulated for, or applicable for the benefit of a child or children of that person who is or are under the age of 18 years.

It is considered that from the date of the execution of the Deed of exclusion and variation the trust will not be a revocable trust under section 102 of the ITAA 1936.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).