Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1013063272332

Date of advice: 1 August 2016

Ruling

Subject: Income Tax: Deductions: Business and professional items: Specific deductions

Question 1

Is The Company allowed a deduction under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) for advice from a legal practitioner regarding proposed penalties and upcoming court hearings about breaches, including actions which should be taken to ensure future compliance, of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Fair Work Act) by The Company and its Managing Director?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

The scheme commences on:

1 July 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, section 8-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, subsection 8-1(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, section 8-1(2)

Reasons for decision

Issue 1

Question 1

Subsection 8-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 allows deductions from assessable income for any loss or outgoing which is:

Subsection 8-1(2) of the ITAA 1997 excludes deductions under subsection 8-1(1) of the ITAA 1997 if the loss or outgoing is:

Paragraph 4 of Taxation ruling TR 2000/5 Income tax and fringe benefits tax: costs incurred in preparing and administering employment agreements states:

In your case, The Company has incurred legal costs associated with breaches of their obligations under the General Retail Industry Award 2010 and the Fair Work Act relating to the Proposed Penalties, upcoming court hearings and corrective actions (The Legal Advice). It is accepted that the nature of the expenditure on The Legal Advice is akin to settling a dispute arising out of an existing employment agreement as described in TR 2000/5 and as such would be an allowable deduction for The Company under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.

Further issues for you to consider

Section 26-5 of the ITAA 1997 specifically excludes a deduction under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 for penalties and fines, specifically the following amounts are not an allowable deduction:


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).