Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1013087639719

Date of advice: 9 September 2016

Ruling

Subject: Gift receipts

Question 1

Can a DGR issue a tax deductible receipt for services provided in lieu of payment for services under Division 30 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997?

Answer

No

Question 2

Can a DGR issue a tax deductible receipt for gifts of property under Division 30 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 where a co-payment is made to the donor?

Answer

No

Question 3

Can a DGR issue a tax deductible receipt for gifts of property under Division 30 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 where no co-payment is made to the donor?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ending 30 June 2017

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2016

Relevant facts and circumstances

The DGR is endorsed under item 4.1.1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) as a Public Benevolent Institution under Subdivision 30-B.

The DGR wishes to provide a tax deductible receipt for the difference between the value of the service supplied and the cost of the service.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 30

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 78A

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

Services made to a DGR are not considered a gift that is deductible as they do not fall within the accepted types of non-testamentary gifts and therefore the DGR cannot issue a gift receipt for the services.

Detailed reasoning

Division 30 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) states the rules for the deductibility of gifts and donations. Section 30-15 of the ITAA 1997 provides that a gift to any fund or institution which is a deductible gift recipient (DGR) is allowable as a deduction in the income year in which the gift is made, provided the gift meets the various conditions of the relevant subsections.

For a donor to claim a deduction for a gift:

Item 1 of Division 30-A of the ITAA 1997 provides a list of the types of gifts to public benefit institution that may be deductible include:

The Taxation Ruling TR 2005/13 Income tax: tax deductible gifts - what is a gift (TR 2005/13) explains what is a gift for the purposes of the gift deduction provisions. At paragraph 13 of TR 2005/13 it states that:

TR 2005/13 in paragraph 21 states that the provision of services to a DGR by a volunteer does not constitute a gift, as the ordinary meaning of property does not include services.

Therefore services made to a DGR are not a gift that is deductible as they do not fall within the accepted types of non-testamentary gifts and therefore DGR cannot issue a gift receipt for the services.

Question 2

Summary

A tax deductible receipt cannot be issued for gifts of property where there a co-payment is made to the donor. This is because the transfer of the gift is not considered to be voluntary, the transfer is not made by way of benefaction and there is a material benefit or advantage received by the giver by way of return.

Detailed reasoning

Paragraph 6 of TR 2005/13 states

Paragraph 13 of TR 2005/13 states that:

For the DGR to be able to accept a gift of property where there is co-payment, the property must fall into one of the categories in paragraph 6 of TR 2005/13 and meet the four requirements in paragraph 13 of TR 2005/13.

1. There is a transfer of the beneficial interest in property

The making of a gift to a deductible gift recipient (DGR) involves the transfer of a beneficial interest in property to that DGR. For there to be a transfer, the property which belonged to the giver must become the property of the DGR. For a gift to be valid and effectual, the giver must have done everything that is necessary, in accordance with the relevant laws governing the transfer of that kind of property, to transfer ownership to the DGR.

Property

Paragraph 17 of TR 2005/13 states that it is a requirement that identifiable property has in fact been transferred to the deductible gift recipient.

As mentioned above, paragraph 21 of TR 2005/13 refers to property as being interpreted in the ordinary meaning of the word. The Macquarie Dictionary defines property as that which one owns; the possession or possessions of a particular owner.

Property has a wide meaning. As well as physical things, it includes rights and interests that are capable of ownership and have a value.

The Macquarie Dictionary defines property as:

and Intellectual property as:

In the circumstance of a website being donated the whole website would not be considered to be property. The components of the website that amount to intellectual property such as video, text, artworks and underlying source code would be considered to be property and could be gifted under Division 30.

The Commissioner of Taxation would need to value the aspects of the website that are gifted as property. The valuation by the Commissioner is unlikely to equal the market value of providing the website as this would take into account the service costs of making the website.

Transfer of beneficial interest

TR 2005/13 states in paragraph 17 to 19 that:

17. It is a requirement that identifiable property has in fact been transferred to the DGR

For a transfer of beneficial interest in the property the aspects that amount to property have to be transferred as per the agreements between the parties. Therefore, providing the contract allows for the aspects of the website that are considered to be property to be transferred, the website would be considered to be transferred to DGR.

Requirement 1 Conclusion:

Some aspects of a website could be identified as property and therefore it would be accepted that there is a transfer of the beneficial interest in the property.

2. Transfer made voluntarily

Transfer pursuant to legal obligation not voluntary

TR 2005/14 states that:

Where the transfer of the property is made under contract, implied or expressed and for consideration, for example part payment, the transfer would not be considered as made voluntarily.

Requirement 2 Conclusion

It is not accepted that the transfer will be voluntarily made.

3. The transfer arises by way of benefaction

TR 2005/13 states

The transfer of property to the DGR is likely to advantage the organisation in pursuing its purposes however a co-payment is a material detriment.

Requirement 3 Conclusion

It is not accepted that the transfer arises by way of benefaction.

4. No material benefit or advantage is received by the giver by way of return

TR 2005/13 states:

As the donors will receive a co-payment or part-payment, this payment is of a material nature being valuable consideration.

Requirement 4 Conclusion

It is not accepted that no material benefit or advantage is received by the giver by way of return.

Question 3

Summary

A tax deductible receipt for gifts of property could be issued where no co-payment or part-payment is received by the supplier.

Detailed reasoning

Where no co-payment or part-payment is received by the supplier and provided that the gift requirements are met a tax deductible receipt for gifts of property could be issued.

If for example, no co-payment or part-payment was received by the supplier of a website, and the property value of the website was valued by the Commissioner of Taxation as being worth more than $5000.00, it would be considered a gift.

Using a website for an example, any valuation would be based on the intellectual property of the website not on the market value of creating the website. As previously stated above the intellectual property aspects could include the content, artwork and the coding. The Commissioner would need to value the aspects of the website that are considered property. The valuation by the Commissioner is unlikely to equal the market value as the market value takes into the service costs of making the website.

Question 3 Conclusion

If the tests are met then a tax deductible receipt for gifts of property could be issued where no co-payment or part-payment is received by the supplier.

Further things to consider

If the property was considered a gift under Division 30 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 the provisions in Subdivision 78A of the ITAA 1997 may apply.

TR 2005/13 states as follows:


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).