Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1013089762273

Date of advice: 5 October 2016

Ruling

Subject: GST and rental guarantee

Question

Is your receipt of the Guaranteed Rent, directly from the Vendor or by deduction from your solicitor's trust account, an adjustment event under section 19-10 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act)?

Answer

Yes, your receipt of the Guaranteed Rent, directly from the Vendor, or by deduction from your solicitor's trust account, are adjustment events under section 19-10 of the GST Act.

Relevant facts and circumstances

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 subsection 9-10(1).

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 paragraph 9-10(2)(g).

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Division 19.

Reasons for decision

Why the Guaranteed Rent is not a separate supply

A 'supply' is any form of supply whatsoever [subsection 9-10(1) of the GST Act]. 'Supply' also includes 'an entry into, …, an obligation…' [paragraph 9-10(2)(g) of the GST Act]. The undertaking to provide the Guaranteed Rent would fall into either of these two categories and is, therefore, prima facie a supply that is separate from the supply of the Property.

However, nothing in the the Contract indicates that the Guaranteed Rent is intended to be a supply made by the Vendor to you that is separate from the supply of the Property to you. In the absence of a clear intention to the contrary in the Contract, the Guaranteed Rent is readily viewed as being merely a term in the Contract for the sale of the Property.

Support for our view that the Guaranteed Rent should be viewed as being merely another term of the Contract for the supply of the Property is found in the United Kingdom case lliffe and Anor [1994] BVC 625 (the lliffe case). The taxpayer there acquired a lease of a unit for a specified sum. The taxpayer and the vendor entered into a mortgage capping agreement (MCA) under which the taxpayer received payments from the vendor to ensure the taxpayer's interest payments for their finance were kept below a certain level. The parties also entered into a rent guarantee agreement to protect the incoming cash flow of the taxpayer by guaranteeing the rental income over a 2 year period.

The question at issue was whether the payments made under the MCA were consideration for a supply made by the taxpayer to the vendor. That is, was there any service provided by the taxpayer to the vendor that was not simply an integral part of the overall agreement under which the vendor entered into various undertakings in return for a payment of a specified sum by the taxpayer? Although the tribunal only had to decide the question of whether the MCA payments were consideration for a supply made by the taxpayer to the vendor, they also addressed the treatment of the payments made by the vendor to the taxpayer under the rent guarantee agreement - deciding that they fell for the same treatment as the payments made under the MCA.

The tribunal found as facts that the commercial substance of the transaction entered into by the parties was that the vendor undertook:

In return, the tribunal found that the taxpayer undertook to pay a specified sum and to nominate the vendor as a letting agent.

The Commissioner contended that the payments received by the taxpayer under the MCA constituted an inducement offered to the taxpayer to enter into the transaction, take the lease and get the taxpayer to part with his money. The taxpayer contended that the payments received by them under the MCA were not consideration received for a supply made by them to the vendor.

The tribunal concluded on the facts, that the MCA was part and parcel of the overall transaction, and the terms entered into in the MCA were part of that transaction.

In the same way, we see the Guaranteed Rent as being but one term in the Contract for the sale of the Property.

GSTD 2014/3 does not technically apply in your situation because:

Paragraph 5 of GSTD 2014/3 states:

"Rental guarantees that are not covered by the circumstances set out in paragraph 1 are outside the scope of this Determination. Whether payments made under such rental guarantees give rise to adjustments would require consideration of all the relevant facts and circumstances."

However, we are of the view that the following rationale from paragraph 1 of GSTD 2014/3 applies to your situation:

The agreement between the vendor and the purchaser of the real property is integral to the contractual arrangement under which the parties have agreed to the terms and set the price for the sale of the property.

Composite Supply

Another reason why we consider that the Guaranteed Rent is not a separate supply is that it could also be viewed as being incidental and integral to the dominant supply of the Property. Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2001/8 Goods and services tax: apportioning the consideration for a supply that includes taxable and non-taxable parts (GSTR 2001/8) provides guidance in differentiating between mixed and composite supplies. Paragraph 17 of GSTR 2001/8 provides information on a composite supply and states among other things that:

a 'composite supply' is used to describe a supply that contains a dominant part and includes something that is integral, ancillary or incidental to that part. You treat a composite supply as a supply of a single thing.

Thus, the Guaranteed Rent is simply a part of a composite supply made under the Contract. Therefore, the Guaranteed Rent is not a separate supply for the purposes of the GST Act. Paragraph 59 of GSTR 2001/8 provides information on the indicators that a part of a supply may be integral, ancillary or incidental to the dominant part of the supply. The relevant indicators from paragraph 59 of GSTR 2001/8 that the Guaranteed Rent is integral, ancillary or incidental to the supply of the Property are:

Why payments of Guaranteed Rent are not consideration for a taxable supply (if any) made by you.

For the Guaranteed Rent to be consideration for a taxable supply (if any) made by you there must be a nexus between the payment and the supply.

As a statement of general principle, the tribunal in the Iliffe Case said:

'…in the absence of such clear evidence…, the tribunal should be reluctant to dissect the transaction entered into artificially into a separate supply of entering into the transaction and the transaction itself. What is the entire transaction will depend upon the facts of each individual case but the presumption must normally be that all the undertakings and commitments entered into by each of the parties to the transaction are themselves integral parts of the overall transaction and not separate commitments which can be categorised as inducements for the other party to enter into the overall transaction.'

For the above reasons, we are of the view that the Guaranteed Rent is not consideration for a separate taxable supply made by you.

The Guaranteed Rent payments are adjustment events

The consideration for sale of the Property is effectively reduced when the Vendor makes Guaranteed Rent payments directly to you or when you deduct those payments from the amount held in trust. The decrease in the consideration is an adjustment event within the meaning of Division 19 of the GST Act.

However, the initial specified sum deposit of Guaranteed Rent into your solicitor's trust account is not an adjustment event. This is because the mere depositing of the specified sum into the trust account has not had the effect of changing the consideration for either party.

In summary, we conclude that the Vendor entered into a single arrangement with you under which the Property was sold to you. One of the terms of that agreement is a Guaranteed Rent clause in your favour. The Guaranteed Rent is an integral part of the supply of the Property by the Vendor and so it is arguable that it can be viewed as being a part of a composite supply. You have not, on the facts presented to us, made a separate supply to the Vendor. Therefore, the Guaranteed Rent is not consideration for a taxable supply made by you. Finally, those Guaranteed Rent payments are merely made to meet the rent guarantee obligations under the Contract. The payments have the effect of changing the consideration for the supply of the Property. Accordingly, the payments are adjustment events.

As you have advised that the supply of the Property was a GST-free supply of a going concern the adjustment events will not result in an adjustment to your net amounts for the relevant tax periods. The 'net amount' refers to the GST payable or GST refundable in the relevant tax period. This means that there is no numerical adjustment to the Business Activity Statement that was lodged in relation to the tax period relevant to the sale of the Property. There is also no numerical adjustment to the Business Activity Statements that relate to the tax periods relevant to the receipt of the Guaranteed Rent. The GST payable or refundable for the relevant tax periods remains unchanged because the Guaranteed Rent only affects the amount of consideration for the GST-free supply of the Property.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).