Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1013102680343

Date of advice: 5 October 2016

Ruling

Subject: Work-related travel expenses

Question

Are you entitled to claim deductions for accommodation, meals and home running costs whilst working at a location away from your normal residence and receiving a location allowance?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 30 June 2016

Year ended 30 June 2017

Year ended 30 June 2018

Year ended 30 June 2019

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2015

Relevant facts and circumstances

You are employed in a remote location.

Your employment requires you to be away from your home, within close proximity to your employment for the duration of your roster, as well as on-call outside of your normal hours. You maintain a residence in the remote location for this purpose.

You are paid a location allowance.

The location allowance you receive is rolled in with your normal gross payments and is not listed separately on your payment summary.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1

Reasons for decision

Section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature.

The cost of meals, accommodation and incidentals are allowable deductions where the taxpayer is travelling away from home in the course of performing their work duties. For example, an office worker attending an interstate conference or an 'on road' salesman could claim deductions for their expenses.

However, no deduction is allowable for these expenses where a taxpayer works at a different location to where they normally live. The place where a taxpayer stays while away from home is considered to be their usual place of residence for that period. These costs are essentially living expenses of a private or domestic nature. The fact that income cannot be earned unless certain expenses are necessarily incurred is not determinative of deductibility.

Court decisions and decisions of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT)/Board of Review, which provide an independent view as to what effect taxation laws should have, confirm this.

In Case X4 90 ATC 116; AAT Case X4 21 ATR 3120 a specialist radiologist with a practice in a small provincial town over 100 kilometres from a capital city was denied a deduction for the costs of maintaining a house which had been purchased in the city where the taxpayer also had professional obligations. The taxpayer travelled to the city every week. The house was not used for business purposes. The sole purpose of purchasing the house was to provide accommodation while the taxpayer was in the city.

The AAT found that the overall picture was that the taxpayer had created a home away from home. Accordingly it held that the outings were incurred for the purposes of maintaining domestic premises and they did not have any relevant connection with income producing activities. It also held that even if it could be shown that the outgoings were incurred for the purpose of producing assessable income the deductions would be disallowed as outgoings of a private or domestic nature.

This decision endorsed the principle established in Lunney v FC of T 100 CLR 478; 11 ATD 404; ALR 225 (Lunney's case), that is, prima facie a taxpayer cannot deduct living expenses as they are considered to be private and domestic in nature. To paraphrase what was said in Lunney's case: while a particular expenditure, for example rent, may be a prerequisite to the earning of income that is not to say that the expenditure is incurred in the gaining or producing of that income.

In your case, you have accepted employment which requires you to perform your work duties in a remote area. Your home is located some distance away from this remote location.

Given the nature of the services to be performed, its length and the fact that the services will be performed, your place of employment is considered to the remote location. During your period of work, you are not considered to be travelling in the course of performing your work duties. Instead, it is considered your travel is undertaken in order to enable you to commence your employment duties. The accommodation, meal and home running cost expenses are incurred by you to enable you to stay in proximity to your place of work. These expenses are a prerequisite to the earning of your assessable income and are not expenses incurred in the course of gaining or producing that income. They are living expenses and have been incurred for private and domestic purposes.

Therefore, no deduction is allowable under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997 for the accommodation, meal and home running expenses you incurred while working in a remote location.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).