Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1013122157849

Date of advice: 8 November 2016

Ruling

Subject: GST Decreasing Adjustments for Termination of Contract

Question 1

Are the requests for repayment of $X (“First Payment Request”) and $Y (“Second Payment Request”) issued by A (“Contractor”) to B (“Subcontractor”) adjustment events under subsection 19-10 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act)?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Is B entitled to decreasing adjustments under section 19-55 of the GST Act in relation to the First Payment Request and the Second Payment Request?

Answer

Yes

Relevant facts and circumstances

On DD MM YY the Contractor entered into a construction project (“the Subcontract”) with the Subcontractor and another subcontractor (“Subcontractor 2”).

B provided a X service (“the First Service”) under the Subcontract.

B registered for GST from mid-late 201X.

B accounts on an accruals basis.

Under the terms of the Subcontract, B was required to provide services for performance of its obligations under the Subcontract to perform works. B and Subcontractor 2 were jointly and severally liable.

On XX A terminated the Subcontract due to the insolvency of Subcontractor 2.

B was unable to step in to perform the works unable to be performed by Subcontractor 2. This resulted in A incurring costs in having to make other arrangements for the works to be completed.

On or around XX, A and B entered into an interim agreement (“Interim Subcontract”) to complete the works that had been allocated to B.

B provided X services (“the Second Services”) under the Interim Subcontract.

The terms of both the Subcontract and the Interim Subcontract provided for A to be compensated from the services provided by B under both contracts for work taken out of the hands of B by A.

On XX A called on the First Service However it only received the benefit of the First Services in mid-late X.

On XX A issued B with a notice seeking payment of the shortfall caused by the termination of the Subcontract (“the First Payment Claim”). A did not claim any amount for liquidated damages in the First Payment Claim.

A took the work out of the hands of B under the Interim Subcontract. This resulted in A incurring costs in having to make other arrangements for the works to be completed.

On XX A issued B with a notice seeking payment of the shortfall (“the Second Payment Claim”) caused by having to take work out of the hands of B under the Interim Subcontract and make alternate arrangements for performance of the works not completed by the Subcontractor

On XX B called upon the Second Services.

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Divisions 19 and 29.

Reasons for decision

In this reasoning, unless otherwise stated, all legislative references are to the GST Act.

Subsections 19-10(1) and (2) state:

19-10 Adjustment events

A change to the previously agreed consideration for a supply

Section 19-40 sets out when adjustments for supplies arise:

19-40 Where adjustments for supplies arise

    You have an adjustment for a supply for which you are liable to pay GST (or would be liable to pay GST if it were a *taxable supply) if:

Paragraph 13 of Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2000/19 (Making adjustments under Division 19 for adjustment events) includes as an adjustment event any event which has the effect of:

…changing the consideration for a supply or acquisition…

On the information you have provided, we accept that changes in consideration were brought about by A issuing both the First Payment Request and the Second Payment Request. They constitute separate adjustment events under paragraphs 19-10(1)(b) and 19-10(2)(b) because they change the original consideration amounts under both the Subcontract and the Interim Subcontract. In both cases B will have a decreasing adjustment equal to the difference between the originally contracted amounts and the amounts remaining after A has recourse to the First Services and the Second Services respectively.

Attribution

Subsection 29-20 of the GST Act states:

29-20 attributing your adjustments

You have advised that B has not yet issued adjustment notes to A in relation to the adjustments resulting from issuance of the First Payment Request and the Second Payment Request, but that upon receipt of a ruling from the ATO that those events trigger decreasing adjustments, B will issue adjustment notes to A for those respective events. We concur with that approach, provided the adjustment notes meet the requirements of subsection 29-75(1) which states:

As B accounts on an accruals basis, each of the decreasing adjustments will be attributable to the tax period in which B issues A with an adjustment note for each of the decreasing adjustments. Upon receipt of those adjustment notes, A will have corresponding increasing adjustments.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).