Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1013140335161

Date of advice: 20 December 2016

Ruling

Subject: Life Insurance Proceeds

Question 1

Will the payment of the life insurance proceeds (the Proceeds) to the Deceased Estate under the Deed be a dividend as defined in subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) and for the purpose of subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936?

Answer

No

Question 2

Alternatively, would the payment of the Proceeds by the Company be regarded as a 'payment' under Section 109C of Division 7A of the ITAA 1936 by the Company and therefore be subject to income tax in the hands of the executor and trustee of the Estate as a deemed dividend?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following periods

1 July 20XX to 30 June 20YY

The scheme commences on

During the income year commencing 1 July 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

A Life Insurance Policy was held by the Company over the life of Person Y.

The Company is the legal entity recognised by the insurer as the owner of the Life Insurance policy (the Policy) and is the entity to which it the Insurer has paid the proceeds of the Policy (the Proceeds).

There was considerable doubt as to beneficial ownership of this policy and who was entitled to the proceeds as there is evidence to suggest that there was a clear intention to transfer ownership of the Policy from the Company to Person Y during their lifetime. Further, payment of premiums was assumed personally by Person Y during their lifetime (by way of a loan account offset with Person Y for all premiums for seven years immediately prior to Person Y's death).

The policy issuer recognised only the legal owner of the Policy and paid the Proceeds of the Policy to the Company to a solicitors trust account.

The taxpayers have since received a jointly instructed independent legal opinion on the ownership of the Policy (the Opinion).

The Opinion concluded that while the legal owner of the policy was the Company, the beneficial ownership of the Policy had passed to the Estate. Person X is the executor and also the sole beneficiary of the Estate. Probate in the Estate was granted to Person X.

Subsequent to the Opinion, the Company and Person X entered into a Deed that:

A subsequent Relevant Court judgment determined that the Estate is the beneficial owner of the Proceeds. The basis of the Judgment was the enforceability of the Deed. The Judgment also determined that this requirement was based on the Opinion.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 6(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 44(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 109C

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

The payment of the Proceeds under the Deed to the Estate will not be a dividend s defined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 and pursuant to section 44(1) of the ITAA 1936.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides that the assessable income of a resident shareholder in a company includes dividends that are paid to the shareholder by a company out of profits derived by it from any source.

Subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 defines 'dividend' to include:

In the current circumstances, the Judgment has determined that the beneficial owner of the Proceeds is the Estate. The Proceeds are held in the Account pending the execution of the Judgment.

When the Proceeds are paid to the Estate there will be no change in beneficial ownership but merely a transfer from the solicitor's trust account to the Estate.

As the Proceeds are not beneficially owned by the Company, their payment to the Estate from the trust account is not a 'distribution' or 'amount credited' by the Company to the Estate for the purpose of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 and is therefore not included in the Estate's assessable income pursuant to subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936.

Question 2

Summary

The payment of the Proceeds by the Company to the Estate will not be regarded as a 'payment' under section 109C of Division 7A of the ITAA 1936 and therefore be deemed to be a dividend.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 109C(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides relevantly:

In the current circumstances, the Judgment has determined that the beneficial owner of the Proceeds is the Estate. The Proceeds are held in the trust account pending the execution of the Judgment.

When the Proceeds are paid to the Estate there will be no change in beneficial ownership but merely a transfer from the solicitor's trust account to the Estate.

As the Proceeds are not beneficially owned by the Company, their payment to the Estate from the trust account is not an amount paid by the Company to the Estate and therefore cannot be taken to be the payment of a dividend for the purpose of subsection 109C(1) of the ITAA 1936.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).