Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051180685282

Date of advice: 17 January 2017

Ruling

Subject: Provision of an exclusive licence

Question 1

Does the provision of an exclusive licence from one company associated with a university to another company associated with the same university a constitute a benefit provided to an associate of an employee in respect of employment for the purposes of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?

Answer

No

Question 2

Does the provision of a licence to a company associated with a university constitute a payment for the purposes of schedule 1 section 12-35 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) (TAA) which will result in a Pay As You Go Withholding obligation?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following periods

Year ended 31 March 20BB

Year ended 31 March 20CC

Year ended 31 March 20DD

The scheme commenced on

1 April 20AA

Relevant facts

Certain employees of a university have generated intellectual property (IP) during the course of their employment at the university. The university is the owner of the IP generated by the employees under the university's IP policy and their respective employment contracts.

Under the university's IP policy, the creators and contributors who may also be employees are entitled to a one-third share of the future profits from commercialisation of IP.

The university has established two trustee companies of fixed trusts.

IP held by the university will be licenced to one trustee company for no consideration, and that trustee company will then on-licence the IP to a second trustee company, for which consideration will be the issue of shares in the second trustee company to the first trustee company.

The second trustee company has issued shares to certain employees of the university.

The university's Intellectual property policy includes the following information:

Definitions

Roles and responsibilities

Persons dealing with university intellectual property

Commercialisation and commercialisation revenue

Obligations of creators and contributors

In general, the transfer of rights to creators will not be considered where:

The Transfer of rights protocol provides the following:

Terms of the LOA

The university will require the following under the LOA:

The Licence and Option to Take Assignment contains the following information:

Parties

Name The two trustee companies

Background

Grant of licence

Licence

The second trustee company's obligations

Commercialisation

The second trustee company must, at its expense:

(a) use its best endeavours to Commercialise the Intellectual Property;

Payments to the first trustee company

(i) $b in respect to Australia

(ii) $c in respect to the remainder of the world.

Grant of option

(b) If:

(i) an Option Event takes place;

(ii) the second trustee company:

and

Further development of Intellectual Property

Development by the second trustee company

The second trustee company must, at its expense, use its best endeavours to:

Ownership of the second trustee company's developments

Development by the University

Intellectual Property Rights

The first trustee company's warranties

Protection

(a) The second trustee company must:

(b) The second trustee company must not:

Patents

Meaning of patent

What will be patented

Patent Ownership

(b) All patents and PBR will be owned by the University.

The Commercialisation protocol sets out the reasons for commercialisation:

Why commercialise? - community benefit

Why commercialise? - increasing the university's resources

Why commercialise? - rewarding innovation and inventiveness

The employment contract includes the following information:

DISCRETIONARY BENEFITS

The discretionary benefits presently provided by the University include:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

You must disclose all Intellectual Property Rights to the University.

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 136(1)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 148(1)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 148(2)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 159

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 318

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Section 12-35

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Does the provision of an exclusive licence from one company associated with a university to another company associated with the same university a constitute a benefit provided to an associate of an employee in respect of employment for the purposes of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)?

Is a 'benefit' being provided?

The term 'benefit' is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA as follows:

(a) an arrangement for or in relation to:

(b) a contract of insurance; or

(c) an arrangement for or in relation to the lending of money.

The proposed transaction involves the first trustee company granting a licence to commercialise IP owned by the university to the second trustee company. The university has arranged with certain of its employees to on-licence the commercialisation of its IP from the first trustee company to the second trustee company. The transaction will involve the conferring of rights for which payment will be received in the form of a royalty or similar exaction.

The proposed transaction will therefore be a benefit.

Is a 'fringe benefit' being provided?

The term 'fringe benefit' is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA as follows:

(a) provided at any time during the year of tax; or

(b) provided in respect of the year of tax;

being a benefit provided to the employee or to an associate of the employee by:

(c) the employer; or

(d) an associate of the employer; or

(i) participates in or facilitates the provision or receipt of the benefit; or

in respect of the employment of the employee, …

For a benefit to be a fringe benefit the following three requirements must be met:

The arrangement involves the university and employees of the university. The benefit involves the first trustee company granting a licence to the second trustee company. The provider of the benefit, the first trustee company, is not the employer, the university, and the recipients of the benefit, the second trustee company, are not employees of the university.

The arrangement involves the university and employees of the university. The benefit involves the first trustee company granting a licence to the second trustee company. The provider of the benefit, the first trustee company, is not the employer, the university, and the recipients of the benefit, the second trustee company, are not employees of the university. A fringe benefit will arise if the provider is the employer, an associate of the employer, or another person under an arrangement, and is provided to an employee, or associate of an employee, in respect of the employment of the employee.

Is the first trustee company an 'associate' of the university?

Subsection 159(2) of the FBTAA states the following:

The first trustee company is the corporate trustee of a trust, and a holding company is the corporate trustee of a holding trust.

The first trustee company is a wholly owned subsidiary of the holding trust which is wholly owned by the university.

The university is deemed to be a company which is related to both corporate trustees and is therefore deemed to be an associate of both corporate trustees. The university is therefore an associate of the first trustee company.

Is the second trustee an 'associate' of the university's employees?

The meaning of 'associates' of natural persons is discussed in subsection 318(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) as follows:

(a) a relative of the primary entity;

(i) the company is sufficiently influenced by:

(A) the primary entity; or

(ii) a majority voting interest in the company is held by:

(A) the primary entity; or

An employee of the university is a natural person and is the primary entity. The second trustee company is a company, and will be an 'associate' of an employee of the university if the employee of the university has a majority voting interest in the second trustee company, or the second trustee company is sufficiently influenced by an employee of the university.

None of the employees of the university hold more than 50% of shares, and therefore, none of the employees of the university has a majority voting interest.

Subsection 148(2) of the FBTAA expands the definition of 'associate' as follows:

(a) the employee; or

(b) a person who, but for this subsection, is an associate of the employee;

under an arrangement between:

(c) the provider, the employer or an associate of the employer; and

If the second trustee company is not otherwise considered to be an associate of employees of the university, it will be an associate of employees of the university if it receives a benefit under an arrangement between the employer, the university, and employees of the university.

The term 'arrangement' is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean:

The university owns the IP, and in agreement with certain of its employees, have on-licenced commercialisation of the IP from the first trustee company to the second trustee company from which the employees are entitled to a share of future profits. The second trustee company receives a benefit under an arrangement between the employer, the university, and employees of the university, and therefore the second trustee company is an associate of certain employees of the university.

This view is confirmed in ATO Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2010/97 Fringe Benefits Tax: third party recipient deemed to be an associate: friend of an employee (ATO ID 2010/97).

Is the benefit in respect of the employment of the employee?

For the benefit to be a fringe benefit it must be provided in respect to the employment of the employee.

In J &G Knowles and Associates Pty Ltd v. FC of T (2000) FCA 196; 2000 ATC 4151; (2000) 44 ATR 22 the Federal Court considered the meaning of 'in respect of employment' in the FBTAA. The Court noted that:

Application to your circumstances

IP is owned by the university and is governed by various policies including the Intellectual Property policy. Under these policies it is considered a benefit to the community to put the university's research outcomes into the public domain. The policies provide that the commercialisation of the IP allows for the dissemination of the innovation and inventions of the university's staff and students into the industry or sector.

As part of the commercialisation the university's IP may be assigned to creators under the Intellectual Property policy and the Transfer of rights protocol.

The employment contract sets out the terms and conditions of employment and provides for discretionary benefits. The provision of an exclusive licence to employees with respect to IP is not listed as a discretionary benefit in the employment contract.

The benefit of an exclusive licence is made pursuant to a separate arrangement between the university and the creators which is governed by the Intellectual Property policy. The benefit is linked to the commercialisation of a research discovery rather than through an existing employment relationship between the university and an individual. Not all discoveries from the university will give rise to such a benefit.

The licence is available to individuals with varying relationships with the university who fall within the terms of the Intellectual Property policy. Staff members, students or visitors in their capacity as creators have an opportunity to share in the commercialisation on the same basis.

The benefit is provided to persons who may or may not be employees of the university. The Intellectual Property policy identifies that being an employee of the university is not a necessary qualifying criteria for a receipt of the benefit.

The provision of the licence is not a reward for services which have been provided, but arises as part of the process of commercially exploiting the discovery as a creator. In addition, the success of the commercial product is not dependent on any work performed by the individual, but rather on the ability to commercialise that discovery.

The required nexus between the provision of the licence and employment is not sufficient for the licence to be considered a benefit provided in respect to the employment of the employee. It is not provided as a reward for services, it will not be provided to the relevant individuals as a consequence of their employment, and it will not be provided to an individual as a result of their employment with the university.

Therefore, the provision of an exclusive licence from the first trustee company to the second trustee company does not constitute a benefit provided to an associate of an employee in respect of employment for the purposes of the FBTAA.

Question 2

Does the provision of a licence to a company associated with a university constitute a payment for the purposes of schedule 1 section 12-35 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) (TAA) which will result in a Pay As You Go Withholding obligation?

Paragraph 14 of Taxation Ruling TR 2005/16 Income tax: Pay As You Go - withholding from payments to employees (TR 2005/16) states for the provision (Section 12-35 of Sch 1) to apply, there must be an employee, a payment of salary, wages etc. to an employee as a consequence of his or her employment and the payment must be made by an entity.

The entity, the university, will provide a licence to creators who are either current employees of the university, students or visitors. In relation to current employees it is accepted that recipients of the IP licence are 'employees'.

For the licence to fall within the provisions of section 12-35 of Sch1 it must either directly or indirectly relate to employment or to services rendered. .

As discussed above the provision of a licence to employees is not as a consequence of the employee's employment. It is provided to them as creators of Intellectual Property and not directly or indirectly in their capacity as employees. Therefore it is not considered salary or wages and there is no obligation to withhold from the provision of the licence to the second trustee company under section 12-35 of Schedule 1 of the TAA.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).