Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051187499457

Date of Advice: 3 May 2017

Ruling

Subject: Goods and Services Tax and Native Title Payments

Question

Answer

No.

The payments made by you to the People (but directed to the various trusts both under Document 1 and Document 2 are not in connection with any enterprise conducted by the People and therefore you are not making any creditable acquisitions in relation to these payments

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

As part of your operations, you have entered into negotiations and concluded a number of agreements with various indigenous communities. The agreements, the subject of this ruling request, have been entered into by you and the People (and their associated entities).

The operation of Document 1 and Document 2 is summarised below.

DOCUMENT 1

Document 1 was entered into on MMYYYY, between representatives of the People, NTAC, A Ltd and you. Pursuant to Document 1, the Parties agreed to settle the Proceedings. Document 1 further acknowledges the termination of Agreement A, with termination effected under Document 2.

The relationship between the Parties and Agreement A parties is as follows:

A brief outline of the native title claim background to these relationships is set out below.

Native title claim background

As required by the NTA (Division 6 of Part 2) and as part of the orders made in the Determination, NTAC, a company registered under the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth) on MMYYYY, was determined on MMYYYY to hold the native title rights and interests the subject of the approved determination of native title in trust for the People and is a registered native title body corporate under the NTA.

Payments made under Document 1

In accordance with clauses XX and XX of Document 1, you have distributed, in lieu of the suspended payments under Agreement A and in relation to the rights obtained by you under Agreement A:

In addition, under clause XX you have paid $XX to the trustee of Trust 1, representing an amount that was payable by you prior to you suspending payments under the Agreement A and that was not previously paid.

Purpose of payments

In settling the Proceedings, the payments under clauses XX:

(a) are made in lieu of the suspended payments under Agreement A;

(b) have been calculated by reference to the quantum of financial benefits that would have been payable (if they had not been suspended) by you under clauses XX (various milestone payments) and XX (production payments) of the Agreement A, with the manner of calculation set out in the table at item X of Schedule X to Document 1; and

(c) are made in lieu of suspended payments in relation to the benefits obtained by you under Agreement A for the operation of its project .

DOCUMENT 2

Document 2 is a long term agreement between you, NTAC and the People, that provides benefits to you and joint ventures undertaking your business in the region and on the Peoples country.

Under the Document 2, the People agree to support your business in the area and deliver necessary statutory consents, approvals and cooperation, in exchange for financial benefits based on production in the agreement area. Document 2 also provides an agreed way for you and the People to work together on matters such as heritage, environment, education, health, employment and community participation.

Document 2 provides a process for a formal review to occur three years after commencement, and then every five years. These reviews are intended to identify whether the agreement is operating as originally intended, whether it continues to be workable and satisfactory, whether things could be done differently, and whether any amendments need to be made.

Any amendments resulting from such a review would be made in accordance with clause XX, which requires the agreement of you and NTAC (with evidence of consultation with and consent from the People). Accordingly, the review is likely to focus on operational and relationship issues, rather than substantive changes to the rights and obligations of each party.

In terms of the parties, NTAC enters into Document 2 in its capacity as the registered native title body corporate holding native title on trust for the People:

• the "PBC" (defined in Document 2 to be NTAC or a replacement registered native title body corporate that holds native title on trust or acts as agent of the common law holders of native title) as at the Commencement Date; and

• agent for and on behalf of the People.

Under clause XX:

• The People and each Person from time to time, must enforce the terms of Document 2 and exercise their rights, only through the PBC.

• The PBC, from time to time:

• The PBC must procure and continue to procure that each person who is from time to time an adult Person complies and acts at all times consistently with the obligations of the People under Document 2.

Further, under clause XX, NTAC, as the PBC, is required to not act inconsistently with the obligations of the People, which effectively imposes the various support obligations on NTAC. This is relevant as NTAC holds the determined native title rights and interests on trust for the People.

However, individual People must also sign a Community Ratification Deed which contains their individual confirmation of agreement to be bound by Document 2 and Sub Fund Agreement.

In addition, Document 2 provides for the role of a "Local Aboriginal Corporation" (which will initially be NTAC) for undertaking certain actions, such as receiving and providing notices (see clause XX Document 2). The Local Aboriginal Corporation must also sign a Deed of Assumption confirming it assumes the obligations of the Local Aboriginal Corporation under Document 2 and Sub Fund Agreement. The Deed of Assumption states that the Local Aboriginal Corporation has no rights under Document 2 and Sub Fund Agreement, but this is intended to mean that it has no such rights in its role as Local Aboriginal Corporation, not in its capacity as the PBC (various provisions of Document 2 clearly contemplate obligations separately imposed on the PBC.

Payments made under Document 2

You will make three different types of production payments under Document 2:

(a) XX Payments are based on the amount of product that you take out of the area within the area of the Determination.

(b) XX Payments are based on the amount of product that you take out of mines in the agreement area, outside of the specific Area mine. These payments are calculated quarterly from and start being paid following the registration of the related indigenous land use agreement (Initial ILUA).

(c) XX Payments are made by you in limited circumstances

Purpose of payments

In broad terms, the payments are:

• in exchange for the on-going support and cooperation of the People as necessary from time to time for you to operate your business in the region, including the obtaining of consents and approvals from time to time; as well as compensation for the temporary or permanent impact of mining activities on the People's native title rights and interests, based on the extent of mining activities from time to time.

The on-going support and cooperation provided by the People includes, in particular:

The on-going support and cooperation goes beyond just NTA procedures. Clauses XX (including the Heritage Protocol referred to in that clause), expressly concern a range of assistance and consents that are not directly related to NTA procedures.

Part X of Document 2 also contains a range of on-going obligations relating to the manner in which the parties are required to work together and clause XX contains on-going obligations in relation to entry into ILUAs.

In terms of compensation for mining activities, clause XX provides that the Production Payments, which are based on the quantity of product produced and hence the extent of mining activities, are compensation for the effect of the operation of your business on the People's native title rights and interests, Aboriginal heritage or cultural values and interests in relation to land derived from a connection or use of land pursuant to Aboriginal tradition.

Who are the payments made to?

Payments are made to the three trusts that are part of a Benefits Management Structure established under Document 2. In summary, when the agreement starts, you are required to pay XX% of the financial benefits to the Trust 2. The remaining XX% of the money will be split between Trust 3 and Trust 4.

Of the XX% that is paid Trust 2 at the beginning of the agreement, XX% of that is set aside by the Trustee into a fund called the Future Fund. The purpose of the Future Fund is to make sure that enough money is set aside for People into the future.

Once the Future Fund is sufficiently large (the intention is that the income on monies invested will support future generations and work under Trust 2) then you will increase the payments to be split between Trust 3 and Trust 4.

The entities in the benefits management structure are explained in further detail below:

• After the Future Fund is amassed, XX% of Production Payments are allocated to Trust 2 for general purposes (the People can request this be changed to XX%).

• Trust 3 - This benefits certain adult People.

• Trust 4 - This benefits certain adult People and relevant entities.

Trust 3 and Trust 4 have been determined by the Commissioner to be Indigenous Holding Entities.

The Benefits Management Structure that receives payments under Document 2 also includes a “Sub Fund Agreement”.

A Ltd is permitted to enter into such an agreement by clause XX of each of the Trust 2, Trust 3 and Trust 4 deeds. As emphasised in clause XX of each of Trust 2, Trust 3 and Trust 4 deeds, each sub fund forms part of the relevant trust fund and does not form a separate trust fund.

The Sub Fund Agreement:

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 9-5

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 9-10

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 9-20

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 11-5

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 23-5

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 184-5

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Section 195-1

Reasons for Decision

In this reasoning:

Under section 11-1, an entity is entitled to input tax credits on any creditable acquisitions it makes.

The term 'creditable acquisition' is defined in section 11-5 as follows:

You make a creditable acquisition if:

You will satisfy the requirements of section 11-5 if subsection 11-5(b) is satisfied.

Section 11-5(b) provides that an acquisition is a creditable acquisition if “the supply of the thing to you is a taxable supply”.

The People will make a taxable supply to you if the requirements of section 9-5 are satisfied. This section provides that:

You make a taxable supply if:

In this case, there is no provision that would make any supply by the People GST- free or input taxed.

Where the People do not meet any one of the criteria in section 9-5, a supply by the People will not be a taxable supply and the acquisition of any supply will not be a creditable acquisition by you.

You submit that under the Document 1, the supply or supplies made by the People to you are not taxable supplies under section 9-5 because:

In respect of Document 2, you submit that if the People are the relevant suppliers under Document 2, those supplies are not taxable supplies. However, in the alternative, you submit that if NTAC is the relevant supplier under Document 2, the supplies made by NTAC to you under Document 2 are taxable supplies under section 9-5.

Supply

Section 9-10 relevantly defines a supply to include an entry into or release from an obligation to do anything or refrain from an act.

Both the Document 1 and Document 2 involve the entry into various obligations by the parties and therefore there are supplies made under the respective agreements. The parties to the Deed of Settlement include X (Plaintiff), Counterclaim Defendants, NTAC, A Ltd (Trustee) and you. NTAC, in its capacity as a registered native title body corporate, holding native title on trust for the People, and for and on behalf of the People who have capacity to contract, is a party to both Document 1 and Document 2.

Who is the supplier to you?

Paragraph 9-5(a) requires that 'you' make a supply. Section 195-1 states that if a provision of the GST Act uses the expression 'you', it applies to entities generally, unless its application is expressly limited.

Section 195-1 also states that 'entity' has the meaning given by section 184-1 and includes:

For GST purposes, a supply must be made by an entity. Consequently, we must examine who is making any supply in relation to the payments from you.

Native Title Aboriginal Corporation (NTAC)

Pursuant to section 56(3) of the Native Title Act 1993 (NTA), on the making of a determination of Native Title, the prescribed body corporate holds, in accordance with the regulations, the rights and interest from time to time comprising the native title in trust for the common law holders. At the time of entering into Document 1 and Document 2, NTAC was the Prescribed Body Corporate (PBC).

Section 57(1) of the NTA states as follows:

Document 1 outlines in what capacity NTAC enters into Document 1. It states:

Document 2 similarly outlines the role of NTAC in the agreements. Part X of Document 2 details the parties to the Agreement. It states that The PBC (NTAC) represents all People for the purposes of the agreement as their agent and as trustee of their native title. At the start of the agreement it is NTAC, which holds native title on trust for the People in accordance with the determination of native title made by the Federal Court on XXYYYY.

Clause X of Document 2 outlines the capacity of NTAC:

Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2000/37 Goods and services tax: agency relationships and the application of the law describes what is meant by principal/agent relationships ('agency relationships').

An entity may be authorised by another party to do something on that party's behalf. The authorised entity is called an agent. The party who authorises the agent to act on their behalf is called the principal. In principal /agent relationships, it is the principal that makes a supply not the agent.

From the information provided, it is clear that NTAC enters agreements merely, as an agent, for the People who have the capacity to contract in relation to the respective agreements. Therefore NTAC will not make taxable supplies to you in respect of the payments under these agreements. Any supplies made will be supplies by either the People individually or collectively.

The People individually and collectively

The People are a party to Document 1 and Document 2 and make supplies pursuant to these documents.

There are arguments that the relevant entity (or entities) making the supply under the respective Agreements is either, (i) each of the People individually, or (ii) the People collectively as an unincorporated association or body of persons or partnership.

These arguments also relate to the analysis of whether the relevant entity is making supplies 'in the course or furtherance of an enterprise' they carry on.

We will therefore consider the question of enterprise in relation to the People both collectively and individually.

People - Enterprise

You submit that the People are not, collectively, carrying on an enterprise and the requirement in paragraph 9-5(b) is not satisfied.

The definition of 'enterprise' in section 9-20 refers (in part) to an activity or series of activities, done:

Section 195-1 states that 'business' includes any profession, trade, employment, vocation or calling, but does not include occupation as an employee. Paragraph 177 of MT 2006/1 provides that to determine whether an activity or series of activities amounts to a business, the activity needs to be considered against the indicators of a business established by case law.

Paragraph 178 of MT 2006/1 states that some indicators of carrying on a business include:

While both Document 1 and Document 2 involve significant payments, the purpose of the People in entering into the agreements relates to recognition of their native title rights and interests and not ongoing, regular activities of a commercial nature such as making sales and engaging in trade. On balance, the People, collectively or individually are not undertaking activities in the form of a business in entering into and performing the obligations under Document 1, Document 2 and similar agreements with mining companies.

The concept of an 'adventure or concern in the nature of trade' is considered in paragraphs 233-261 of MT 2006/1. The public ruling considers the characteristics of trade including the subject matter of realisation, length of period of ownership, frequency or number of similar transactions, supplementary work on or in connection with the property realised, and the circumstances responsible for the realisation. The People's native title rights and interests were not acquired for the purpose of commercial trade but arise from traditional laws and customs. On balance, the characteristics of trade are not satisfied and the activities of the People, collectively or individually, in entering into and performing the obligations under the respective agreements do not involve activities in the nature of trade.

Under the terms of Document 2, the People, collectively or individually, do not enter into any lease or licence or provide any other grant of an interest in property. The People do not agree to provide access rights to you under Document 2. Rather, your interests in property derive from separate State Government agreements.

Therefore, the People, collectively or individually, are not making supplies in the course or furtherance of an enterprise in entering into and performing obligations under either Document 1 or Document 2.

A Limited (A Ltd)

For the sake of completeness we will address the role of A Ltd under both Document 1 and Document 2:

Document 1

A Ltd enters into Document 1 in two capacities:

Clause X of the recitals states as follows:

A Ltd, as Trustee of both the Trust 2 and Trust 3, receives payments on behalf of the beneficiaries of the respective Trusts. It is responsible for looking after Trust 2 and Trust 3 and for applying funds in accordance with the Trust Deeds. .

A Ltd is referred to in this document as follows:

'A in its Relevant Trustee Capacity, as agent'

Furthermore, clause X and X state:

It is clear from the details of Document 1 that A Ltd does not make supplies to you and does not receive Payments from you in this regard.

Document 2

Part X of Document 2 discusses the Benefits Management Structure. The term 'Trustee' is described as follows:

The role of the Trustee is further explained in clause X. Subclause X states:

It is clear from the contents of the Document 2 that A Ltd does not make supplies to you and does not receive payments from you in this regard.

Conclusion

The payments made by you to the People (but directed to the various trusts both under Document 1 and Document 2) are not in connection with any enterprise conducted by the People and therefore there are no taxable supplies made by the People (collectively or individually) under either Document 1 or Document 2. Therefore, as the supplies to you are not taxable supplies, the consideration paid under the respective Agreements is not consideration for a creditable acquisition by you.

In addition, as set out above, NTAC enters into the respective Agreements as the agent of the People and is not making a taxable supply under either Document 1 or Document 2.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).