Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051211173031

Date of advice: 6 April 2017

Ruling

Subject: Capital gains tax

Question 1

Is the taxpayer eligible for a capital gains tax (CGT) discount of 50% in accordance with Division 115 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Does the CGT small business active asset reduction of 50% under Division 152 of the ITAA 1997 apply to 80% of the gains after the CGT discount?

Answer

No, however the small business active asset reduction of 50% will apply to the whole of the capital gain remaining after the CGT discount.

This ruling applies for the following period:

ν Year ended 30 June 20ZZ

The scheme commences on:

20YY

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

The taxpayer and another person formed a partnership (the Partnership), and carried on a business. As partners in the Partnership they purchased a property (the Property).

They used the majority of the property for their business (the Business) and the remaining was rented to another business.

The annual turnover of the Business is more than $2 million.

The Partnership restructured into a company (the Company). Each of the partners owned 50% of the shares of the Company. The Company took over the Business but the Partnership continued to own the property. The Company paid rent to the Partnership for using the property.

The partners had to sell the Property. In 20XX another partnership in which the taxpayer had a 40% interest (the Second Partnership) purchased a new property (the New Property) which is used by the Business.

The Company also increased its share capital in the same year. Only the taxpayer took up the additional shares, the taxpayer's percentage of shareholding increased to significantly more than 50%.

The partners sold the Property in late 20YY.

At the time of selling the Property the partners still had a mortgage loan.

The taxpayer also has a 50% holding in Company N. This company has never traded.

Other CGT assets of the taxpayer, the Partnership and the Second Partnership have been provided.

The CGT assets of the Company have also been provided.

The taxpayer has no other CGT assets apart from the family home and is not involved in the running of any other businesses.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 102-5,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 115,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 152,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 152-10,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 152-15,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 152-35,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 152-40,

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 328-125 and

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 328-130.

Reasons for decision

While these reasons are not part of the private ruling, we provide them to help you to understand how we reached our decision.

Unless otherwise stated, all legislative references are to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997.

Question 1

Summary

The taxpayer is eligible for a CGT discount of 50% as all of the conditions in Division 115 for the discount are satisfied.

Detailed reasoning

Section 102-5 provides the method of calculating an entity's net capital gain for an income year. The following provides a summary of the steps involved.

Under Division 115 for a capital gain to be a discount capital gain the following requirements must be satisfied:

For an individual the capital gain is reduced by the discount percentage of 50%. However, the capital gain can only be reduced after all the capital losses for the year and any unapplied net capital losses from earlier years have been applied.

The CGT discount in Division 115 does not require a choice to be made for its application but applies automatically if its conditions are satisfied.

As the taxpayer purchased the Property more than 12 months before the CGT event happened and the other conditions are satisfied for a discount capital gain, the capital gain may be reduced by 50% as outlined in Step 3 of section 102-5.

Question 2

Summary

The CGT small business active asset reduction of 50% applies to the whole of the capital gain remaining after the CGT discount rather than just the 80% of the remaining capital gain.

Detailed reasoning

Section 152-10 contains the basic conditions which the taxpayer must satisfy in order for the small business concessions to apply to the capital gain. They are:

The Property was owned by the partners in partnership and the sale of the Property is a CGT event. This event would have resulted in a capital gain apart from the small business relief provisions in Division 152.

As neither the taxpayer nor the Partnership is a small business entity, it is necessary to determine whether the taxpayer passes the maximum net asset value test.

MNAV test

Section 152-15 states that:

Under section 328-125 an entity is connected with another entity if:

An entity controls another entity if it or its affiliate (or all of them together):

An affiliate is, according to section 328-130, an individual or a company who acts, or could reasonably be expected to act, in accordance with your directions or wishes, or in concert with you, in relation to the affairs of the business of the individual or company.

The CGT event has happened in relation to a CGT asset of the Partnership and as a partner in a partnership the maximum net asset value test for the taxpayer would include:

As the Partnership was an entity connected to the taxpayer, the calculation of the MNAV will include all the assets of the Partnership but not the value of the taxpayer's interest in the Partnership. Therefore the value of the Property and other CGT assets of the Partnership are included in the calculation of the MNAV.

The Company was an entity connected to the taxpayer as the percentage of the taxpayer's shareholding was significantly greater than 50% just before the CGT event, therefore the net value of its CGT assets is included in the calculation of the MNAV. The value of the taxpayer's shares in the Company, however, is not included as provided for in paragraph 152-20(2)(a):

Company N is also connected to the taxpayer as the taxpayer has 50% shareholding of the company. The value of the taxpayer's shares in the company is also not included in the calculation of the MNAV in accordance with paragraph 152-20(2)(a).

As the taxpayer has a 40% interest in the Second Partnership it is an entity connected to the taxpayer. Therefore the value of the New Property and other CGT assets of the Second Partnership are therefore included in the calculation of the MNAV.

The taxpayer had no other connected entities and as the taxpayer was not involved in the running of any other businesses had no affiliates.

Since the value of the taxpayer's CGT assets is below $6,000,000 the taxpayer satisfies the MNAV test.

Active asset test

The active asset test is contained in section 152-35:

152-35(1)

As is relevant the definition of active asset in section 152-40 provides that:

A CGT asset is an active asset at a time if, at that time:

The majority of the Property was used by the Partnership in its business for a number of years and in the same business by the Company for the remaining years.

As the Property was used in a business that carried on by the taxpayer as a partner in the Partnership and then by an entity connected to the taxpayer for more than half of the time it was owned by the taxpayer, it passes the active asset test in section 152-35.

The taxpayer is therefore entitled to further reduce the capital gain on the disposal of the workshop by applying the 50% active asset reduction as outlined in Step 4 of section 102-5.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).