Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051214041492

Date of advice: 28 June 2017

Ruling

Subject: Request for the Commissioner to extend the 2 year period to dispose of a dwelling.

Question 1

Do the two residential units of accommodation transferred to you under the deceased’s estate constitute one 'dwelling’ as defined in section 118-115 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and allow an extension of time to the two year period?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ending 30 June 201G

The scheme commences on:

1 July 201F

Relevant facts and circumstances

The deceased and deceased’s spouse acquired two pre CGT residential units of accommodation as joint tenants.

The two residential units of accommodation are contained on the one title.

The front unit of accommodation consisted of X bedrooms, X undercover garages, a detached rumpus garage and additional car parking spaces (front unit).

The rear unit of accommodation consisted of X bedrooms, was self-contained and physically separated from the front unit of accommodation (rear unit).

The two units of accommodation are physically separated from each other, but are not fenced and car parking is shared. Both units were used as a single residence by the very large extended family.

The deceased’s spouse passed away in early 201A.

The deceased passed away in mid-201B (the deceased).

The front unit of accommodation was the deceased’s main residence.

Power and water supplied to both units of accommodation was delivered via one meter and was paid by the deceased. The deceased also paid the Council rates and water rates.

The deceased’s will appointed more than five beneficiaries.

Some of the beneficiaries were interested in individually purchasing the property from the remaining beneficiaries, and various offers were made to purchase the units. The first offer was made in late 201C, but was considered too under-valued and the beneficiaries were unable to reach an agreement in relation to the purchase price of the units.

Offers submitted by some beneficiaries to the other beneficiaries continued to be made from early 201D for around 15 months, but were held to be unreasonable and not accepted by the beneficiaries, resulting in conflict between the beneficiaries.

Less than five of the deceased’s children, beneficiaries of the deceased’s estate, commenced legal action in the Relevant Court NSW in early 201E to force the other beneficiaries to sell the deceased’s units of accommodation.

Less than five children of the deceased were the plaintiff’s in legal proceedings instigated against the other defendant beneficiaries seeking orders under Division 6 of Part IV of the Conveyancing Act 1919 to enforce the sale of the units of accommodation via public auction.

Instead of commencing formal court proceedings in mid-201E, the case was stood over a further month so the parties to the legal proceedings could enter into consent orders.

The parties to the legal proceedings agreed that instead of appointing public trustees or for the property to vest in Trustee upon the Statutory Trust for sale under Division 6 of Part IV of the Conveyancing Act 1919, the property would be sold via public auction.

Agreed consent orders were entered into by the parties to the legal proceedings in late 201E.

The units of accommodation were auctioned in late 201E and settlement occurred in early 201F.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 104-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 118-115

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118-195

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 118-195(1)

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

Given the proximity and integration of activities that occurred between the units of accommodation, the front and rear units of accommodation are considered a 'dwelling’ for the purposes of section 118-115.

Detailed reasoning

Taxation Determination TD 1999/69 allows for the term 'dwelling’ as defined in section 118-115 of the ITAA 1997 to include more than one unit of accommodation.

Whether two or more units of accommodation are used together as one place of residence or abode for the purposes of the definition of 'dwelling' is a question of fact that depends on the particular circumstances of each case.

TD 1999/69 also states that the relevant factors when considering whether units of accommodation are used together as one place of residence or abode include:

In your circumstances, the integration of activities that occurred between the front and rear units of accommodation included the following:

Having regard to the above factors and the proximity and integration of activities that occurred between both units of accommodation, the front and rear units are considered 'a 'dwelling’ for the purposes of section 118-115.

Question 2

Summary

The Commissioner will exercise his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and allow an extension of time for the disposal of the units of accommodation.

Detailed reasoning

The capital gains provisions allow for concessional treatment to be given to a dwelling that was owned by a deceased person if the executors of the deceased person’s estate sell that dwelling within two years of the date of death.

Any capital gain or capital loss made on the sale of such a dwelling is disregarded if the dwelling was:

The Commissioner has the discretion to extend the two year period. This extension is generally only granted where the executors are merely arranging the ordinary sale of the dwelling and the cause of the delay is beyond their control (for example, if the will is challenged). There must not be any other factors mitigating against exercising it.

The delay in disposing of the dwelling was caused by unexpected delays in the settlement of the dwelling for reasons outside the beneficiary or trustee’s control and these delays prevented you from disposing of the dwelling within the two year time limit.

The Commissioner accepts that it is appropriate to grant the short extension that you have requested.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).