Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051223185556

Date of advice: 11 May 2017

Ruling

Subject: Demerger

Question 1

Will the demerger of X Co by Y Co satisfy the requirements for demerger relief under Division 125 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) so that any capital gain or loss that Y Co makes on disposal of its shares in X Co will be disregarded pursuant to section 125-155 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes.

Question 2

Will the in specie distribution of shares in X Co to the Y Co shareholders constitute a demerger dividend, as defined in subsection 6(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Answer

No.

Question 3

If the answer to Question 2 is yes, will the demerger dividend be subject to franking under section 202-45 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

N/A

Question 4

Will the Commissioner make a determination under subsection 45B(3) of the ITAA 1936 that section 45BA or section 45C of that Act will apply to the whole, or any part of any benefit provided to shareholders and make a further determination under subsection 45C(3) of the ITAA 1936 that a franking debit arises in the franking account of Y Co in relation to the capital component of the demerger distribution?

Answer

No.

Question 5

Will Y Co have any withholding tax obligations under section 12-210 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA 1953) in respect of any part of the demerger allocation?

Answer

No.

Relevant facts and circumstances

Background

Y Co

X Co

Z Co

The demerger of X

The in specie distribution

Reasons for the demerger

Y's primary reason for undertaking the demerger is to separate the two business units operating within the Y Group. The commercial rationale for the demerger included, to enable each business:

Accounting for the distribution to effect the demerger

Other matters

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 6(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 44(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 44(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 44(4)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 44(5)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Section 45B

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45B(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45B(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Paragraph 45B(2)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Paragraph 45B(2)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45B(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Paragraph 45B(3)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Paragraph 45B(3)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45B(4)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45B(5)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45B(6)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45B(8)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45B(9)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Section 45BA

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45BA(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45BA(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Section 45C

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 45C(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936, Subsection 177A(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Section 104-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Division 125

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 125-60(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Paragraph 125-60(1)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Paragraph 125-60(1)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 125-65(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 125-65(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 125-65(4)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 125-65(6)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Section 125-70

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 125-70(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Paragraph 125-70(1)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subparagraph 125-70(1)(b)(i)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subparagraph 125-70(1)(c)(i)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Paragraph 125-70(1)(d)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subparagraph 125-70(1)(e)(i)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Paragraph 125-70(1)(g)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Paragraph 125-70(1)(h)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 125-70(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Paragraph 125-70(2)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 125-70(5)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 125-70(7)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Paragraph 125-70(7)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Section 125-155

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Section 202-45

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Section 975-300

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 975-300(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, Subsection 995-1(1)

Tax Administration Act 1953, Section 12-210

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Division 125 of the ITAA 1997 allows members of a demerger group to disregard certain capital gains and capital losses that arise as a result of a demerger. Section 125-155 of the ITAA 1997 automatically disregards capital gains or capital losses that a demerging entity makes from CGT event A1, C2, C3 or K6 happening to its ownership interests in a demerged entity under a demerger if the conditions in Division 125 of the ITAA 1997 are satisfied.

Subsection 125-60(1) of the ITAA 1997 defines ownership interest to include a share in a company. Prior to the demerger, Y will hold 100% of the shares in X. Accordingly; Y has an ownership interest in X.

Y will disregard a capital gain arising from CGT event A1, C2, C3 or K6 happening when it disposes of its ownership interests in X if Y is a demerging entity, and the capital gain is from a CGT event happening to its ownership interests in a demerged entity under a demerger (section 125-155 of the ITAA 1997).

An entity is a 'demerging entity' if it satisfies one of the paragraphs specified in subsection 125-70(7) of the ITAA 1997. In order to determine whether Y satisfies one of the paragraphs specified in subsection 125-70(7) of the ITAA 1997, it is necessary to determine the members of the demerger group, and in particular who will be the head entity of the demerger group.

A demerger group comprises the head entity of the group and one or more demerger subsidiaries (subsection 125-65(1) of the ITAA 1997).

Head entity

Subsection 125-65(3) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a company or trust is the head entity of a demerger group if no other members of the group owns ownership interests in the company or trust. For a company, an ownership interest includes a share in a company (paragraph 125-60(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997). For a trust, an ownership interest includes a unit or other interest in the trust (paragraph 125-60(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997).

Y is the head entity of the demerger group on the basis that:

Demerger subsidiary

Subsection 125-65(6) of the ITAA 1997 states that a company is a 'demerger subsidiary' of another company or trust that is a member of a demerger group if the other company or the trust, either alone or together with other members of the group, owns or has the right to acquire ownership interests in, the company that carry between them:

X is a demerger subsidiary on the basis that another entity, Y, owns ownership interests that carry the right to:

Demerger group

The demerger group in this case will comprise Y as the head entity of a demerger group of at least one demerger subsidiary (X).

In accordance with paragraph 125-70(7)(a) of the ITAA 1997, Y will qualify as a demerging entity as it will dispose of 100 percent (i.e. at least 80 percent) of its ownership interests in X, another member of the demerger group, to Y shareholders, who were owners of the original interests in Y.

Demerger

The requirements for a demerger are contained in section 125-70 of the ITAA 1997. A demerger will happen to the Y Group as:

Conclusion

Y will dispose of all of its ownership interests in X to Y shareholders, who were owners of the original interests in Y. That is, Y will dispose of ownership interests in another member of a demerger group to the owners of the head entity of the demerger group.

Accordingly, when Y (the demerging entity) disposes of its ownership interests in X (the demerged entity) to the Y shareholders under the demerger arrangement, any capital gain or capital loss that it makes will be disregarded under section 125-155 of the ITAA 1997.

Question 2

Subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 defines a 'dividend' as including any distribution made by a company to any of its shareholders, whether in money or other property and any amount credited by a company to any of its shareholders as shareholders. However, paragraph (d) of the definition of 'dividend' excludes a distribution that is debited against an amount standing to the credit of the share capital account of the company.

The term 'share capital account' is defined in section 975-300 as an account that a company keeps of its share capital, or any other account created on or after 1 July 1998 where the first amount credited to the account was an amount of share capital. Subsection 975-300(3) states that an account is not a share capital account if it is tainted. The share capital account of Y is not tainted within the meaning of Division 197.

The in specie distribution to Y shareholders of X shares will be recorded as a $x million debit to Y's share capital account. No other property will be distributed to Y shareholders as part of the demerger and no other account or reserve will be debited as a result of the distribution of X shares to Y shareholders. This amount will therefore not be a dividend for the purposes of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 and will not be assessable as a dividend under subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936.

Central to the demerger dividend relief provisions are the concepts of 'demerger dividend' and 'demerger allocation'. These terms are defined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936.

A 'demerger dividend' is defined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936 as that part of a demerger allocation that is assessable as a dividend under subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936, or that would be so assessable but for subsections 44(3) and 44(4) of the ITAA 1936.

Where a restructure is undertaken by way of a disposal of ownership interests, a 'demerger allocation' is the total market value of the allocation represented by the ownership interests disposed of by a member of a demerger group under a demerger to the owners of ownership interests in the head entity (paragraph (b) in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936). The demerger allocation may consist of an otherwise assessable dividend component, a return of capital or a combination of capital and profit.

The in specie distribution to Y shareholders of X shares debited to Y's share capital account represents the entire demerger allocation. Therefore, because there is no difference between the demerger allocation and the amount debited against the share capital account, there is no demerger dividend. Accordingly, Y's shareholders will not receive a demerger dividend as part of the demerger. The $x million debited against the share capital account will therefore not be a demerger dividend for the purposes of subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936.

Question 3

As the dividend is not a demerger dividend as defined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936, section 202-45 of the ITAA 1997, which provides that a demerger dividend is unfrankable, will have no application.

Question 4

Subsection 45B(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides that the purpose of section 45B of the ITAA 1936 is to ensure that relevant amounts are treated as dividends for taxation purposes if:

Subsection 45B(2) of the ITAA 1936 sets out the conditions under which section 45B of the ITAA 1936 will apply to a demerger. Relevantly, the subsection provides that:

The Commissioner is empowered under subsection 45B(3) of the ITAA 1936, when the requirements of subsection 45B(2) of the ITAA 1936 are met, to make a determination that sections 45BA or 45C of the ITAA 1936 apply, respectively, in relation to a demerger benefit (see paragraph 45B(3)(a) of the ITAA 1936) or capital benefit (paragraph 45B(3)(b) of the ITAA 1936).

The effect of section 45BA of the ITAA 1936 applying to a demerger benefit is that the amount of the demerger benefit, or part of the benefit, is taken not to be a demerger dividend.

The effect of section 45C of the ITAA 1936 applying to a capital benefit is that the amount of the capital benefit, or part of the benefit, is taken to be an unfranked dividend.

It can be seen that section 45B of the ITAA 1936 turns on a test of whether there is a more than incidental purpose (rather than 'dominant' purpose) on the part of anyone who entered into or carried out the scheme, of enabling the relevant taxpayer to obtain a tax benefit.

Under the scheme, the Y shareholders will obtain a tax benefit because the demerger benefit fully comprises a capital benefit which would be subject to less tax than if it had been an assessable dividend, due to the operation of the CGT roll-over concession in Division 125 of the ITAA 1997.

Paragraph 45B(2)(a) of the ITAA 1936 will be satisfied as there is a scheme under which a person is to be provided with a demerger benefit or a capital benefit by a company (Y). Paragraph 45B(2)(b) of the ITAA 1936 is also satisfied as Y's shareholders will obtain a tax benefit within the meaning of subsection 45B(9) of the ITAA 1936.

Paragraph 45B(2)(c) of the ITAA 1936 sets out an objective purpose test for the Commissioner to consider having regard to the 'relevant circumstances' of the scheme as set out in subsection 45B(8) of the ITAA 1936.

Having regard to the relevant circumstances of the scheme as set out in subsection 45B(8), it cannot be concluded that the scheme is to be entered into or carried out for a more than incidental purpose of enabling Y shareholders to obtain a tax benefit.

Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45B(3) of the ITAA 1936 that section 45BA of the ITAA 1936 applies in relation to the demerger benefit or that section 45C of the ITAA 1936 applies to the capital benefit under the scheme to which this ruling relates.

Question 5

Section 12-210 of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 states:

As explained in the answer to Question 2 above, the in specie distribution to Y shareholders of X shares, being debited against an amount standing to the credit of the share capital account, is not a 'dividend' as defined in subsection 6(1) of the ITAA 1936. Therefore, it will not be included in the assessable income of Y shareholders under subsection 44(1) of the ITAA 1936 and Y will not have any withholding tax obligations under section 12-210 of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 in respect of any part of the demerger allocation.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).