| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051232590421
Date of advice: 01 June 2017
Ruling
Subject: Deductibility of legal expenses
Question and answer
Are you entitled to a deduction for legal costs you incurred and legal costs awarded against you in relation to your legal proceedings against your former employer?
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ending 30 June 20XX
The scheme commences on:
1 July 20XX
Relevant facts and circumstances
You resigned from your employer in 201X.
You commenced legal proceedings against your employer to recover unpaid commissions.
You were unsuccessful in your legal proceedings.
You incurred legal expenses and legal costs were awarded against you as a result of your unsuccessful legal proceedings.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1
Reasons for decision
Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) allows a deduction for a loss or an outgoing to the extent to which it is incurred in gaining or producing assessable income, except where the loss or outgoing is of a capital, private or domestic nature.
In determining whether a deduction for legal and other expenses is allowed under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997, the nature of the expenditure must be considered (Hallstroms Pty Ltd v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1946) 72 CLR 634). The nature or character of the expenses follows the advantage which is sought to be gained by incurring the expenses. If the advantage to be gained is of a capital nature then the expenses incurred in gaining the advantage will also be of a capital nature.
Taxation Determination TD 93/29 Income Tax: if an employee incurs legal expenses recovering wages paid by a dishonoured cheque, are these legal expenses an allowable deduction under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997?, explains the deductibility of legal expenses.
On the subject of whether a legal expense is a deductible expense, paragraph 1 of TD 93/29 states:
Yes, providing that the legal action relates solely to the recovery of wages. This is because in deciding '…whether expenditure has the character of a capital or of a revenue payment … the advantage for which the expenditure was incurred must be identified and the manner in which it “is to be relied upon or enjoyed” must be considered…’. (Magna Alloys & Research Pty. Ltd. v. FC of T 80 ATC 4542 at 4548; 11 ATR 276 at 283).
In your case, you incurred legal expenses in relation to the recovery of unpaid commissions. Although you were unsuccessful in your legal proceedings, you incurred the expenses to recover commissions which are considered ordinary income.
Therefore, the legal expenses you incurred and were awarded against you are deductible under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
