Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051240057226

Date of advice: 21 June 2017

Ruling

Subject: Fringe Benefits tax

Question

Is travelling between an employee’s residence and their client’s home considered to be business travel under the operating cost method of valuing car fringe benefits and therefore an employer’s aggregate non-exempt amount under subsection 5B(1E) of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA)

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods

1 April 2017 to 31 March 2018

1 April 2018 to 31 March 2019

1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020

The scheme commences on

2008

Relevant facts and circumstances

You are a Public Benevolent Institution (PBI) that cares for disadvantaged members of society by providing nursing and personal care services to clients in their homes as part of your aged care services.

Duties of personal carers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and nurses

The duties performed by the employees perform the following duties but not limited to:

Daily routines

Most equipment can be picked up a day before the visit.

Employees often travel between their home residence and employer’s base and between their home residence and home of clients. Personal use is kept to an absolute minimum and staff are asked not to use cars for private use unless it is an emergency.

Recordkeeping

All staff complete log books electronically which is interfaced with the client community care program, this is accessed using a portable device.

In some instances manual logbooks/log sheets are completed.

Copies of the electronic logbook can be provided to the ATO upon request.

Itinerant travel

The nature of travelling performed by the employees is inherently itinerant. Relevant factors include:

Additional information

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 57A

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 5B(1E)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 5B(1D)

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 5E(2)

Reasons for decision

You are a PBI that provides cars to your employees which are garaged at their place of residence. You also provide cars through salary packaging. The availability of these cars for private use is a benefit.

Benefits provided to an employee of a PBI are exempt from fringe benefits tax (FBT) under section 57A of the FBTAA up to the $30,000 capping threshold. If an employee is provided with fringe benefits above the capping threshold, then the PBI will be subject to FBT on those fringe benefits.

An employer that is a PBI must determine its fringe benefits tax liability, if any, for each year of tax. To do this the employer needs to calculate its fringe benefits taxable amount which is the amount on which the employer must pay FBT.

For a PBI, the employer's fringe benefits taxable amount is increased by the employer's aggregate non-exempt amount for the year of tax under subsection 5B(1D) of the FBTAA.

The employer's aggregate non-exempt amount is worked out in accordance with subsection 5B(1E) of the FBTAA. This is done by determining each employee's individual grossed-up non-exempt amount which is effectively the amount of any fringe benefits above the capping threshold.

In order to determine each employee's individual grossed-up non-exempt amount, the employer must work out the amount that would be each employee's individual fringe benefit amount. To do this each benefit must be treated as if it were a fringe benefit where:

Under subsection 5E(2), an employee's individual fringe benefits amount is the sum of the employee's share of the taxable value of each fringe benefit that relates to the year of tax other than an excluded benefit.

In order to determine the individual fringe benefit amount for an employee who is using an employer’s car, you need to calculate the taxable value as if that benefit were a fringe benefit.

In your case, you have maintained log books to determine the business use of cars. Employees travel between their home residence and employer’s base and between their home residence and home of clients. They generally visit 6 to 10 clients per day.

Miscellaneous Taxation Ruling MT 2027 Fringe benefits tax: private use of cars: home to work travel (explains the situations where home to work travel may constitute business travel).

One of these situations, as listed in paragraph 25 of MT 2027, is where the nature of the employee’s employment is inherently itinerant.

Guidelines for determining whether an employee is carrying out itinerant work are provided by Taxation Ruling TR 95/34 Income tax: employees carrying out itinerant work - deductions, allowances and reimbursements for transport expenses.

Paragraph 7 sets out the following characteristics as being indicators of itinerancy:

In applying these characteristics to your employees:

As most of your employees call into the work base quite frequently to collect client meals or meet with senior staff or collect equipment needed to go to the client, they are considered to have a fixed place of work.

Having a fixed place of work, the journey between an employee’s home residence and their work base each day would be considered to be travel to work rather than on work and therefore, private travel.

Employees do not perform any employment or business duties at their homes. Employees’ homes do not constitute a base of operations.

Therefore, your employees would not satisfy the criteria that the nature of their employment is inherently itinerant.

Although the employees’ nature of employment is not inherently itinerant, the journey may be considered business where the circumstances are akin to those described in paragraphs 28 to 36 of MT 2027.

Paragraphs 30-33 of MT 2027 states:

Paragraph 34 further clarifies that,

Therefore, in your circumstances, employees travelling directly from home to a client’s home where they perform substantial employment duties are undertaking business travel, as the client’s home is considered to be an alternative work place. Where return travel of this kind is undertaken from the employees’ alternative work place, this would also be considered business travel.

Employees travelling directly between home and their work base (their regular place of employment), would be private travel as in the decision in Lunney and Hayley v GCT (1958) 100 CLR.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).