Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051243036565

Date of advice: 29 June 2017

Ruling

Subject: Fringe benefits tax

Question 1

Is the paid-parking facility a commercial parking station?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

If so, are you liable for fringe benefits tax (FBT) on the provision of car parking to your employees that

Answer

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 31 March 2017

Year ended 31 March 2018

The scheme commences on:

April 201X

Relevant facts and circumstances

This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description of the scheme that is set out below. If your circumstances are materially different from these facts, this ruling has no effect and you cannot rely on it. The fact sheet has more information about relying on your private ruling.

A paid-parking facility at an airport has been built within a one kilometre radius of your business premises.

The businesses that are within a one kilometre radius of the paid-parking facility provide their own parking free of charge.

The intention of the paid-parking facility is for it to be used by airline passengers and visitors not the entire general public.

The paid-parking facility is run at a profit. You have provided details of those rates. The rate for parking for six hours is greater than the car parking threshold for the year ended 31 March 2018.

Spaces are available for short and long term parking.

Based on usage, the majority of parking at the paid-parking facility is for a time frame of less than six hours.

Your employees work at your premises which are within a one kilometre radius of the paid-parking facility.

The employees do not contribute anything towards the parking.

Each of the employees would typically park in these spots for more than four hours.

They own their own vehicles and use them to travel between home and work. The vehicles that are driven often alternate between cars and non-car vehicles.

This is the employee’s primary place of employment.

Assumption

The rate for all-day parking at the paid-parking facility will be above the car parking threshold for future years.

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 39A,

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 section 58G,

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 subsection 136(1) and

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 995-1(1)

Reasons for decision

While these reasons are not part of the private ruling, we provide them to help you to understand how we reached our decision.

All references made in these reasons for decision are to the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 unless otherwise stated.

Question 1

Summary

The paid-parking facility is classified as a commercial parking station as it is a permanent commercial parking facility with parking spaces available in the ordinary course of business to members of the public for all-day parking between 7.00am and 7.00pm on payment of a fee.

Detailed reasoning

Commercial parking station is defined in subsection 136(1):

All-day parking is defined in subsection 136(1). In relation to a particular day, this effectively means the parking of a single car for a continuous period of six hours or more between 7.00am and 7.00pm on that day.

The paid-parking facility is a permanent and commercial facility.

There are parking spaces available at the paid-parking facility for six hours or more between 7.00am and 7.00pm to anyone who wants to park there. This is consistent with the requirement that 'any or all of the car parking spaces are available in the ordinary course of business to members of the public for all-day parking’.

Taking into account your contentions we will address the relevance of the primary purpose and use of a parking facility in determining whether the facility is a commercial parking station.

Paragraph 81 of Taxation Ruling TR 96/26 Fringe benefits tax: car parking fringe benefits provides an example of a facility where all-day parking is available but is discouraged and is considered to not constitute a commercial parking station:

The exclusion of short-term shopper parking facilities by the Commissioner in this example did not result from the express words of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986. It is reasonable to assume that in interpreting the meaning of commercial parking station, the Commissioner took into account extrinsic materials to determine the intent of Parliament including the Explanatory Memorandum to the Taxation Laws Amendment (Car Parking) Bill 1992):

A shopping centre, for example, may have a parking facility that has a primary purpose of allowing car parking for up to three hours for free for short term shoppers, but they charge high penalty rates for more than three hours to discourage all-day parking.

Although parking at businesses within a one kilometre radius of the paid-parking facility is free, the paid-parking facility’s fees are not consistent with penalty rates aimed at discouraging all-day parking.

Notwithstanding the example provided in paragraph 81 of TR 96/26, we do not consider that there exists a single primary purpose test that can be applied to all parking facilities such that if a particular parking facility’s primary purpose is not all-day parking it is excluded from the definition of commercial parking station.

In Qantas Airways Limited v. Commissioner of Taxation [2014] AATA 316; 2014 ATC 10-360; (2014) ATR 467 (Qantas Tribunal case), the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) held that the airport parking stations (other than those at Canberra) are commercial parking stations such that the provision of parking spaces at those parking stations may be a car parking fringe benefit.

Qantas appealed to the Federal Court against the decision in respect of the provision of parking spaces at airport parking stations other than at Canberra Airport. In Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Qantas Airways Ltd (2014) 227 FCR 554; [2014] FCAFC 168; 2014 ATC 20-477; (2014) 100 ATR 97, the Federal Court considered the question of whether the provision of parking spaces at various airport parking facilities is a car parking fringe benefit. The Court concluded that the Tribunal was correct in relation to this question (but incorrect in relation to Canberra Airport).

In reaching its decision that the parking facilities at the airports were commercial parking stations the Tribunal had noted the following at paragraphs 35 and 36 in the Qantas Tribunal Case:

A commercial parking station for the purposes of section 39A is not intended to exclude parking facilities on the basis of who might use them and how they might be used. The criteria for determining what constitutes a commercial parking station are set out in its definition in subsection 136(1).

If the criteria set out in the legislation are met then the paid-parking facility will be a commercial parking station even though most of the people parking there are users of the airport and most cars are parked for less than six hours.

Therefore as the paid-parking facility is a permanent commercial parking facility with parking spaces available in the ordinary course of business to members of the public for all-day parking on payment of a fee, it is a commercial parking station.

Question 2

a)

Summary

You are liable for FBT on the provision of car parking to your employees who park their cars at your business premises as all of the conditions in subsection 39A(1) are satisfied.

Detailed reasoning

You will be liable to FBT on the provision of car parking to your employees if the provision of that parking is a car parking fringe benefit. A car parking fringe benefit is defined in subsection 136(1) to mean 'fringe benefit that is a car parking benefit’.

A car parking benefit will arise on a day if all of the conditions as outlined in subsection 39A(1) are satisfied during the hours from 7.00am to 7.00pm on that day:

Paragraph (a)

For a car parking benefit to exist the vehicle parked must be a car as defined in subsection 136(1) which has the given by subsection 995-1(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997):

Your employees sometimes drive vehicles that are cars to work. They park their cars on your business premises.

Your employees’ cars are parked within a kilometre of the paid parking facility which is a commercial parking station. It which charges a fee for all day parking that is above the car parking threshold.

For future years you have asked us to assume that the rate charged by the airport car park will be above the car parking threshold.

Paragraph (b)

Your employees typically park for more than four hours.

Paragraph (c)

Your employees own the cars.

Paragraph (d), (e) and (f)

You provide the car parking to your employees at their primary place of employment.

Paragraph (g)

Your employees use their cars to travel between home and work.

Paragraph (h) and (i)

The provision of the parking facilities is not excluded under the regulations and it is after 1 July 1993.

As all of the conditions in subsection 39A(1) are met on the days when your employees park their cars at your business premises, a car parking fringe benefit arises and you will be liable to FBT.

b)

Summary

You are not liable for FBT on the provision of parking to your employees when they park vehicles that are not cars as you are not providing car parking fringe benefits but residual benefits that are exempt benefits.

Detailed reasoning

An employer will be liable to FBT where the benefit provided to the employee is a fringe benefit. The definition of a fringe benefit excludes benefits that are exempt benefits.

Where an employer provides parking for a vehicle that is not a car as defined in subsection 136(1), a car parking benefit will not arise. The benefit provided by the employer will be a residual benefit.

Subsection 58G(1) provides that 'a residual benefit where the recipients benefit consists of motor vehicle parking facilities’ will be an exempt benefit.

Motor vehicle has the meaning given by subsection 995-1(1) of the ITAA 1997, which is 'any motor-powered road vehicle (including a 4 wheel drive vehicle)’.

Therefore, where your employees drive to work and park a vehicle that is not a car you will not be liable to FBT as the residual benefit that you provide is an exempt benefit.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).