Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051243479473

Date of advice: 28 June 2017

Ruling

Subject: Whether exercising of trustee's powers results in specific CGT Events

Question 1

1. Will execution of an irrevocable deed by ABC in their capacity as Trustee and Guardian of the ABC Family Trust (Trust) that would:

Answer

No

Question 2

2. Will execution of an irrevocable deed by ABC in their capacity as Trustee and Guardian of the Trust to effect the Proposed Amendments result in the happening of CGT event E1 or CGT event E2?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following periods:

30 June 2017 to 31 July 2017

The scheme commences on:

30 June 2017 or date of execution being no later than 31 July 2017

Relevant facts and circumstances

3. This ruling is based on the facts stated in the description and the application submitted to the Commissioner on the specified date (Application).

4. The Trust was settled on a date by Settlor (Settlor) and ABC through the execution of a deed of settlement (Trust Deed).

5. The Applicant is the trustee of the Trust. At the time of the Application, the Trustee is also the Appointor and Guardian of the Trust.

6. The Trust is a discretionary trust.

7. The Trust Deed, or relevant parts of the Trust Deed (including any defined terms), as they exist in the form as provided to the Commissioner of Taxation on the specified date, form part of, and are to be read with, the relevant facts and circumstances in this Ruling.

8. It is proposed that the Trustee will execute an irrevocable deed that will result in:

9. The purpose of ABC intending to effect the proposed amendments is to ensure that the individual beneficiaries of the Trust are those family members that are related to their children and align the beneficiary class to those members of ABC’s family who have historically benefited from distributions under the Trust (being ABC, their children and their remoter issuer).

Assumptions

10. This ruling is made on the basis of the following assumptions:

Relevant legislative provisions

Reasons for decision

Question 1

11. Section 104-10(1) of ITAA 1997 states that:

12. Section 104-10(2) states that:

13. CGT Event A1 happens when you dispose of a CGT asset. The proposed amendments to the Trust Deed will not result in a change of ownership to occur from the Trustee to another entity.

14. The Proposed Amendments would not give rise to CGT event A1.

Question 2

15. Section 104-55(1) states that:

16. An exception is contained in section 104-55(5) which states:

17. Section 104-60(1) states that:

18. An exception is contained in section 104-60(5) which states:

19. A question arises as to whether the proposed amendments to the Trust Deed would result in the creation of a new trust. The question is whether there has been a break in the continuity of the trust estate such that the trust was effectively deprived of all assets and then re-endowed. Where this occurs, it could give rise to the happening of CGT events E1 or E2.

20. As a general proposition, the approach adopted by the Full Federal Court in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Commercial Nominees of Australia Limited (1999) 167 ALR 147(at 157-158) (Commercial Nominees), is authority for the proposition that assuming there is some continuity of property and membership of the trust, an amendment to the trust that is made in proper exercise of a power of amendment contained under the deed will not have the result of terminating the trust, irrespective of the extent of the amendments so made so long as the amendments are properly supported by the power. Relevantly, in Commercial Nominees the Full Federal Court had stated that:

21. The Commissioner’s view is that, a change in the terms of the trust pursuant to exercise of an existing power (including an amendment to the deed of a trust) will not result in a termination of the trust and, therefore, will not result in CGT event E1 happening. This does not apply where the exercise of a power under the deed would lead to a conclusion that those assets are now held on terms of a distinct (that is, different) trust.

22. This is set out in Taxation Determination TD 2012/21 Income tax: does CGT event E1 or E2 in sections 104-55 or 104-60 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 happen if the terms of a trust are changed pursuant to a valid exercise of a power contained within the trust’s constituent document, or varied with the approval of a relevant court? (TD 2012/21). TD 2012/21 is primarily based on the decisions in Commercial Nominees and FC of T v Clark & Anor [2011] FCAFC 5 (Clark).

23. Paragraph 1 of TD 2012/21 states that where the terms of a trust are changed pursuant to a valid exercise of a power contained within the trust’s constituent document, neither CGT event E1 nor CGT event E2 happens unless:

24. Relevantly, example 1 of the TD 2012/12 provides some guidance where the trust deed is amended for the addition of new entities to, and exclusion of existing entities from, class of objects.

25. Paragraph 26 of TD 2012/21 goes further to say:

26. As such, so long as any amendment to the trust obligations is made in accordance with a power conferred by the trust instrument creating the obligations, then there will be 'identity’ of taxpayer notwithstanding those changes.

27. Clause 17 of the Trust Deed provides that:

28. The proposed exercise of powers contained in clauses 1.1(8)(b) and (c) by the Trustee to exclude certain Beneficiaries and exercise of power under Clause 17 to make variations to the Trust Deed would:

29. This would be consistent with Example 1 of TD 2012/21.

30. The purported exercise of the powers would not result in the property of the Trust commencing to be held under a separate charter of rights and obligations such as to give rise to the conclusion that the trust property has been settled on terms of a different trust. The purported changes would not result in any changes to the terms and conditions under which the Trustee would continue to administer the property of the Trust.

31. Based on the above discussion, neither CGT event E1 nor CGT event E2 would arise as a result of the Trust executing an irrevocable deed to make the proposed amendments.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).