Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051244438509

Date of advice: 30 June 2017

Ruling

Subject: Deduction of legal costs and settlement amounts

Question 1

Are the portion of legal expenses incurred by you in defending a breach of contract claim bought against you by your former employer deductible?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Are the portion of settlement costs incurred by you in complying with the deed of settlement with your former employer deductible?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 30 June 2016

Year ended 30 June 2017

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2015

Relevant facts and circumstances

You work in the XYZ industry.

You are the director of a small business (company A).

You had completed some short contracts for an unrelated entity (company B) and were offered a job with them, which you accepted and entered into an employment contract for.

You still undertook freelance work with company A for your existing clients while employed with company B.

You resigned from company B and performed a handover with written documents and team meetings to discuss on hand projects.

Company B alleged through their lawyers that you deleted items from your email account with them in order to disrupt their business and claimed damages due to breach of contract.

You engaged barristers to refute the claims.

Company B filed a claim against you, as first defendant, and company A, as second defendant, in court for alleged damages and loss.

You and company B filed a defence in court denying any breach of duty of fidelity and good faith.

A pre-trial hearing saw a trial booked.

A deed of settlement was negotiated between Company B, you and company A with you and/or company A to pay an amount to Company B as full and final settlement of the proceedings.

Relevant legislative provisions

Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Reasons for decision

Section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 allows a deduction for all losses and outgoings to the extent to which they are incurred in gaining or producing assessable income except where the outgoings are of a capital, private or domestic nature, or relate to the earning of exempt income.

In determining whether a deduction for legal expenses is allowed under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997, the nature of the expenditure must be considered (Hallstroms Pty Ltd v. FC of Taxation (1946) 72 CLR 634; (1946) 3 AITR 436; (1946) 8 ATD 190). The nature or character of the legal expenses follows the advantage that is sought to be gained by incurring the expenses. If the advantage to be gained is of a capital nature, then the expenses incurred in gaining the advantage will also be of a capital nature.

The courts, on a number of occasions, have determined legal expenses to be an allowable deduction if the expenses arise out of the day to day income producing activities of the taxpayer (The Herald and Weekly Times Ltd v. FC of T (1932) 48 CLR 113). The action out of which the legal expense arises has to have more than a peripheral connection to the taxpayer's business or income earning activities. The expense may arise out of litigation concerning the taxpayer's professional conduct (Magna Alloys and Research Pty Ltd v. FC of T (1980) 11 ATR 276; 80 ATC 4542; Putnin v. FC of T (1991) 21 ATR 1245; 91 ATC 4097).

When the principal reason for incurring the legal expenses is defending the actions of the taxpayer in carrying out their employment duties through which they gain or produce assessable income, such expenses are characterised as being of a revenue nature and are deductible (Inglis v. FC of T 87 ATC 2037; and Case V116 88 ATC 737; AAT Case 4502 (1988) 19 ATR 3703).

Your legal expenses are not considered to be private in nature as they were related to an issue that arose while carrying out your employment position. That is, the legal action arose as a result of your employment. The Commissioner considers that the treatment of a settlement sum payment will follow the treatment of other legal costs incurred in relation to a particular matter. Accordingly, the legal expenses you incurred and the settlement sum you paid have the requisite connection to your income earning activities and you are entitled to a deduction for these expenses under section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).