| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051252396094
Date of advice: 25 July 2017
Ruling
Subject: Main residence exemption
Question 1
Did the beneficiary have a right to occupy the property under the deceased’s will?
Answer
Yes.
Question 2
Are you entitled to a full main residence exemption when you dispose of the dwelling?
Answer
Yes.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ended 30 June 2017
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2016
Relevant facts and circumstances
The deceased owned a property.
The property was not used to produce assessable income and was the deceased’s main residence prior to their death.
The deceased’s will is a simple will in which it directs the trustees to apply the residual of the estate as necessary or desirable to meet the needs and comforts of a relative (the beneficiary). On the death of the beneficiary, the residual of the estate is to go to the trustees.
Accordingly, the trustees took the view that the will allows the beneficiary to reside at the property until their death.
The beneficiary later moved out of the property and moved into supported accommodation.
The property was later sold.
From when the beneficiary moved out of the property until when it was sold, the beneficiary continued to treat the dwelling as their main residence.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-195
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-145
Reasons for decision
Section 118-195 of the ITAA 1997 provides that a capital gain or capital loss made from the disposal of a dwelling is disregarded where:
● the property was acquired by the deceased on or after 20 September 1985 and the dwelling was the deceased’s main residence just before the deceased’s death and was not then being used for the purpose of producing assessable income, and
● the dwelling is the main residence of a person who has been given a right to occupy the dwelling or a life tenancy under the deceased’s will from the deceased’s death until the ownership interest ends.
In this case, the property was the deceased’s main residence prior to death, and at that time, was not being used to produce assessable income. The deceased’s child then continued to live in the property after the deceased’s death.
ATO ID 2003/109 discusses when an individual has a right to occupy a dwelling and states:
An individual would be considered to occupy a dwelling under the deceased's will if it was in accordance with the terms of the will. This would also be the case if it was in pursuance of the will or under the authority of the will (see Evans v. Friemann (1981) 53 FLR 229 at 238).
In this case, the beneficiary was a resident of the property at the date of the deceased’s death. The deceased’s will stated that their estate is to meet the needs and comforts of the beneficiary.
While it was not mentioned in the will that a “right to occupy” of the property was given to the beneficiary, it can be ascertained from the words of the will that the beneficiary lived in the property in accordance with the terms of the will.
Section 118-145 of the ITAA 1997 provides that a taxpayer can make a choice to continue to treat a dwelling as their main residence even though they no longer live in it. Where the dwelling is used to produce income, the choice is effective for a period of up to six years. Where the individual has passed away, this choice can be made by the executor of their estate. However, where the individual to who the main residence exemption applies passes away, the exemption period ceases.
Therefore, as the beneficiary did have the right to occupy the dwelling, and they continued to treat the property as their main residence after they moved out, the capital gain made on disposal of the property can be disregarded in full.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
