You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051255568901

Date of advice: 25 July 2017


Subject: GST and payments in relation to out-of-court settlement


Are the settlement sums paid as out-of-court settlement pursuant to the Deed of Release, subject to goods and services tax (GST)?


The compensation payment for the missing items and the payment for the legal cost are not subject to GST. The payments for the use of disputed items and retained items are subject to GST. Please refer to the reasons for decision.

Relevant facts and circumstances

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 – section 9-5

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 – subsections 9-10(1) and (2)

Reasons for decision

Section 9-5 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) provides that you make a taxable supply if you make the supply for consideration; and the supply is made in the course or furtherance of an enterprise that you carry on; and the supply is connected with the indirect tax zone; and you are registered or required to be registered.

However, the supply is not a taxable supply to the extent that it is GST-free or input taxed.

The term 'supply’ is defined in subsection 9-10(1) of the GST Act as 'any form of supply whatsoever’ and includes an entry into, or release from, an obligation to do anything; or to refrain from an act; or to tolerate an act or situation (Paragraph 9-10(2)(g) of the GST Act).

Goods and Services Tax Ruling GSTR 2001/4 deals with the GST consequences of court orders and out-of-court settlements and discusses the meaning of supply. Paragraph 22 of GSTR 2001/4 provides that a supply is essentially 'something which passes from one entity to another’.

Further, paragraph 25 of GSTR 2001/4 states:

Therefore, the term 'supply’ covers not only the subject of the transaction – the thing that passes – but also includes the action by which the thing passes from one entity to another. In addition, by use of the words 'make’ in the phrase 'you make the supply’ in paragraph 9-5(a) of the GST Act, there is a requirement for a supplier to take some action to cause a supply to be made.

In this case, it is important to consider what has been supplied in relation to the components of the settlement sum agreed between the parties. In the context of an out-of-court settlement, a supply referred to under any of the paragraphs within subsection 9-10(2) could be related to an out-of-court settlement.

A supply related to an out-of-court settlement may have occurred prior to the settlement or it may be created by the terms of the settlement itself. There may be more than one supply that is related to a settlement and in addition, the subject of the dispute may not be a supply at all.

Taxable supply in relation to out-of-court settlement

Each and every supply is subject to GST provided the supply satisfies the requirements of a taxable supply, as explained above. GST becomes payable on the relevant supply. Where the subject of the dispute is an earlier transaction in which a supply was made involving the parties that supply is referred to as 'earlier supply’.

Section 9-15 of the GST Act provides that a payment will be consideration for a supply if the payment is 'in connection with’ a supply and 'in response to’ or 'for the inducement’ of a supply. There must be a sufficient nexus between a particular supply and a particular payment, which is provided for that supply, for there to be a supply for consideration.

There are two elements to the definition of consideration. The first is the payment by one entity to another and the second is the nexus that must be established between the payment and a supply.

According to the Deed of Release, the lessor is required to pay the entity for the use of fittings and other items. The entity has made 'earlier supply’ of fittings and other items for periods specified in the Deed of Release. Based on the facts provided, there are sufficient nexus between the supply of fittings and other items for rental purposes and the payments made by the lessor for these supplies. Therefore, these supplies are taxable supplies and GST should be payable on these supplies.

Compensation and damages

According to the Deed of Release, the lessor and the entity have undertaken not to sue each other subject to the payment of the settlement sum. The settlement sum includes the following payments by the lessor:

Tax Office view in GSTR 2001/4 is that certain conditions of settlement can create supplies for GST purposes such as the supplies listed in Paragraph 9-10(2)(g) of the GST Act . Such supplies are referred to as discontinuance supplies. To determine whether the discontinuance supply would be a taxable supply, it is necessary to consider the terms of the Deed of Release to establish whether there is a nexus between the payment and the discontinuance supply.

Paragraph 106 and 107 of GSTR 2001/4 state:

According to paragraph 109 of GSTR 2001/4, the payment made under a settlement deed may have a nexus with a discontinuance supply only if there is overwhelming evidence that the claim which is the subject of the dispute is so lacking in substance that the payment could only have been made for the discontinuance supply.

Based on the facts provided, we do not consider that the above two payments were made in relation to discontinuance supplies. The payments were made for the loss of items supplied by the entity to the lessor and to compensate the legal cost incurred by the entity.

According to paragraph 111 of the GSTR 2001/4, if a payment is made under an out-of-court settlement to resolve a damages claim and there is no earlier or current supply, the payment will be treated as payment of the damages claim and will not be consideration for a supply at all, regardless of whether there is an identifiable discontinuance supply under the settlement.

Although both parties agreed not to commence proceedings against each other subject to the payment of settlement sum, we note that the above two payments do not have a nexus to discontinuance supplies and therefore are not subject to GST.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).