Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051268811686

Date of advice: 28 August 2017

Ruling

Subject: Sovereign Immunity

Question

Is the non-resident entity immune from income tax and withholding tax under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity on any income and capital gains derived from its investments in Australian equity securities (including investments in unit trusts and real estate investment trusts) outlined in its private ruling application?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended XXXX

Year ended XXXX

Year ended XXXX

The scheme commenced on:

XXXX

Relevant facts and circumstances

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 128B

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 4-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 995-1(1).

Reasons for decision

When determining whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies to exempt Australian sourced income and gains from Australian income tax and/or withholding tax, it is necessary to establish the following:

If these three conditions are satisfied, then the income or gains will not be subject to Australian income tax and/or withholding tax.

Condition 1: A foreign government or an agency of a foreign government

In the context of sovereign immunity, it is considered that an entity which is wholly owned by a foreign government is an 'agency of a foreign government' where that entity is performing a function for the public advantage and executes a function in the public interest and is not a private body established for private profit.

The non-resident entity is an agency of a foreign government because;

Given the above factors, the Commissioner accepts that the non-resident entity satisfies this requirement.

Condition 2: the monies being invested are and will remain government monies

In line with the principle that sovereign immunity applies to foreign states performing only governmental functions, an entity claiming sovereign immunity must establish that the monies being invested are and will remain government monies.

All capital of the non-resident entity is funded by the State and owned by the State.

All income and gains from the investments made by the non-resident entity that are the subject of this Ruling, being income or gains from the investments of the foreign exchange reserves of the State, belong to the State.

It is considered that the money being invested by the non-resident entity is and will remain government money.

Given the above factors, the Commissioner accepts that the non-resident entity satisfies this requirement.

Condition 3: The income or gain is being derived from a non-commercial activity

As noted in ATO Interpretive Decision ATO ID 2002/45 Sovereign Immunity, whether an operation or activity is a commercial transaction will depend on the facts of each case. As a guide, a commercial transaction is generally considered to be an activity concerned with the trading of goods and services, such as buying, selling, bartering, transportation, and includes the carrying on of a business. A passive investment is more likely to be considered a non-commercial transaction.

In relation to the ownership of shares in a company or other similar equity interests, there will be instances where the extent of the holding gives rise to questions as to whether the interests constitute a passive investment or a commercial investment.

In all circumstances, consideration will be given to factors relating to the influence or control potentially able to be exercised by the investor (or a related party/associate of the investor) in relation to the investment. This includes (but is not limited to) any potential influence or control in relation to day to day management and key business, strategy and financial decisions.

The non-resident entity held a number of investments in Australia which has been documented.

The full list of investments relevant to the ruling was attached to the private ruling application.

The following factors are relevant to determining whether the non-resident entity’s investments in Australia relevant to the ruling were commercial activities:

The above factors demonstrate that non-resident entity’s investments were passive investments, and therefore non-commercial activities, satisfying this condition.

Given the above factors, the Commissioner accepts that the non-resident entity satisfies this requirement.

Conclusion

As the three conditions have been satisfied, the non-resident entity will be immune from income taxes and withholding taxes on all income and gains it derives from its investments in Australia outlined in the private ruling application under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).