| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051275353446
Date of advice: 29 August 2017
Ruling
Subject: Incapacity for work payments
Question and Answer
Are amounts of compensation you received included in your assessable income?
Yes
This ruling applies for the following periods
Financial year ended 30 June 2017
The scheme commences on
1 July 2016
Relevant facts and circumstances
You are in receipt of a compensation (incapacity) payment.
The payments are compensation for an injury you received.
The payment is made as long as you demonstrate an incapacity for work.
You will continue to receive fortnightly incapacity payments for as long as you are unable to work, because of the compensable condition.
Relevant legislative provisions
Section 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Section 52-65 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997
Reasons for decision
Section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997 states that assessable income consists of both ordinary income and statutory income. However, an amount of ordinary or statutory income will not be assessable income if the amount is made exempt or is otherwise excluded from assessable income.
In AAT Case Re Davy and FCT (2003) 53 ATR 1011; [2003] AATA 544, the AAT held that a compensation payment to an ex-member under the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (SRC) for a serious eye injury sustained while he was employed was not exempt income. The taxpayer had argued that the payment was exempt in s 52-65 which deals with income support supplement payable under the Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (VET) on the grounds of permanent incapacity. The AAT found that the exemption did not apply as the payment made to the taxpayer was similar in nature to a workers' compensation payment made to an injured worker.
Accordingly, the payments under the SRC Act and VET Act, although both made by the, were completely different. It followed that the payment was not similar to the income support supplement and the taxpayer was not entitled to the exemption claimed.
For income tax purposes, an amount paid to compensate for a loss generally acquires the character of that for which it is substituted: Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Dixon (1952) 86 CLR 540; (1952) 5 AITR 443; 10 ATD 82. Compensation payments which substitute income have been held by the courts to be income under ordinary concepts: Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Inkster (1989) 24 FCR 53; (1989) 20 ATR 1516; 89 ATC 5142, Tinkler v. FC of T (1979) 10 ATR 411; 79 ATC 4641, and Case Y47 (1991) 22 ATR 3422; 91 ATC 433.
Your regular compensation payment is intended to provide financial support and assistance to you as a result of your inability to continue employment. The compensation payment will effectively replace your income from salary and wages.
Accordingly, the compensation payment is characterised as income according to ordinary concepts and is therefore included in your assessable income within the terms of section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
