| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051282240881
Date of advice: 13 September 2017
Ruling
Subject: Deceased estate main residence exemption extension
Question 1
Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA1997) in relation to the property?
Answer
Yes.
Having considered your circumstances and the relevant factors, the Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the ITAA 1997 and allow an extension of time until late 20XX. Further information on the relevant factors and inheriting a dwelling generally can be found on our website ato.gov.au and entering Quick Code QC52250 into the search bar at the top right of the page.
This ruling applies for the following periods:
Year ending 30 June 20XX
The scheme commences on:
1 July 20XX
Relevant facts and circumstances
The property was acquired by the deceased and their spouse before 20 September 1985.
The property was used as their main residence from the date of acquisition.
In 20XX the deceased’s spouse died and left their portion of the property to the deceased.
The deceased passed away in early 20XX.
They left a will dated late 20XX.
Probate was granted to the executors of the estate.
The deceased’s child challenged the will.
The dispute proceeded to the Supreme Court. The matter was heard in late 20XX. The issue was resolved at this time through orders of the court.
Due to the dispute there was a delay in the administration of the estate, specifically the sale of the property.
Following the orders from the court the property was transferred to the executors.
After minor repairs, cleaning and painting, the executors appointed a Real Estate agent to sell the property at auction.
The auction was unsuccessful.
The executors appointed a different Real Estate agent and the property was sold in mid 20XX and settled in late 20XX.
The property was not used to derive assessable income before or after the passing of the deceased.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 118-195(1)
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
