Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051286833171
Date of advice: 27 September 2017
Ruling
Subject: Capital Gains Tax - Deceased Estate - Two Year Extension
Question
Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the Income TaxAssessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) and allow an extension of time to the two year period to XX July 20XX?
Answer
Yes
Having considered your circumstances and the relevant factors, the Commissioner is able to apply his discretion under subsection 118-195(1) of the ITAA 1997, and allow an extension of time until XX July 20XX.
Further information on the relevant factors, and inheriting a dwelling generally, can be found on our website ato.gov.au by entering Quick Code QC52250 into the search bar at the top right of the page.
This ruling applies for the following period:
Year ended 30 June 2018
The scheme commences on:
1 July 2017
Relevant facts and circumstances
The deceased passed away in July 20XX.
The deceased and their late spouse owned two properties together.
Both properties were purchased prior to 20 September 1985.
There were three beneficiaries of the deceased’s Will.
Probate of the Will was granted in March 20XX.
When the deceased’s Estate was first established, there were numerous disputes between the beneficiaries in regards to how the assets of the Estate were to be dispersed to each beneficiary.
At the time of the dispute between the beneficiaries, one of the beneficiaries was suffering from multiple medical conditions.
Due to the beneficiary suffering from the medical conditions, the beneficiary was advised by a medical practitioner not to travel or to deal with legal matters relating to the Estate unless they were completely able to focus and comprehend the consequences of what was occurring. The beneficiary resided in another state and as a result of not being able to travel, the beneficiary was unable to travel for meetings relating to resolving the dispute of the Estate.
Both properties have now been sold with settlement occurring in July 20XX.
Relevant legislative provisions
Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 118-195(1).
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).