| Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051297386854
Disclaimer
You cannot rely on this edited version in your tax affairs. You can only rely on the advice that we have given to you or to someone acting on your behalf.
The advice in the Register has been edited and may not contain all the factual details relevant to each decision. Do not use the Register to predict ATO policy or decisions.
Date of advice: 30 October 2017
Ruling
Subject: Transfer of pre-CGT property
Question
Will a pre-CGT (capital gains tax) asset owned by a parent company retain its pre-CGT status if the asset is transferred to a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company?
Answer
Yes
This ruling applies for the following period
Income year ended 30 June 2018
The scheme commences on
1 July 2017
Relevant facts and circumstances
X Pty Ltd owns real property.
A new company will be incorporated in the relevant income year. This new company will be a wholly owned (100%) subsidiary of X Pty Ltd.
The new company will be able to distribute.
X Pty Ltd will transfer the property to its new subsidiary.
The property was purchased before 20 September 1985. At that time there were X shareholders of X Pty Ltd, individuals who each held 20% of the shares.
There has been only one change to shareholdings since that time. There was a share buyback from one of the shareholders, and the remaining Y shareholders now each hold 25% of the shares. These shares have equal rights as to income and capital distributions from the company.
Relevant legislative provisions
Subdivision 149-A of the ITAA 1997
Subdivision 149-B of the ITAA 1997
Reasons for decision
Summary
The property will retain its pre-CGT status on the transfer to a wholly owned subsidiary company.
Detailed reasoning
Division 149 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) contains the provisions regarding when an asset stops being a pre-CGT asset. Subdivision 149-B considers assets of non-public entities.
Subsection 149-30(1) of the ITAA 1997 states:
The asset stops being a pre-CGT asset at the earliest time when majority underlying interests in the asset were not held by ultimate owners who had majority underlying interests in the asset immediately before 20 September 1985.
Majority underlying interests is defined in section 149-15 of the ITAA 1997 as consisting of:
(a) more than 50% of the beneficial interests that ultimate owners have (whether directly or indirectly) in the asset; and
(b) more than 50% of the beneficial interests that ultimate owners have (whether directly or indirectly) in any ordinary income that may be derived from the asset.
An ultimate owner is defined in section 149-15 of the ITAA 1997 and, relevantly for this Ruling, includes individuals.
In this situation, X Pty Ltd originally had X ultimate owners, each with an interest of 20% of the company. It changed its shareholdings with a buyback of shares from one shareholder, and now has X ultimate owners, each with a 25% interest.
After the share buyback, the majority of the underlying interests in the pre-CGT property continued to be maintained. This has not changed since that time.
The proposal is to now transfer the property to a new company, which will be a wholly owned subsidiary of X Pty Ltd.
ATO ID 2010/99 provides the Commissioner’s view on such a situation. It explains that it is possible for the ultimate owners to alter the way in which they held their pre-CGT interest in an asset without affecting the pre-CGT status of that asset. For example, a new entity being interposed between the entity that directly owns the asset and the ultimate owners, or a transfer of assets between entities wholly owned by the same head entity.
As the property will be transferred to a wholly owned subsidiary of X Pty Ltd, there will be no change to the underlying interest as the ultimate owners will continue to maintain their interest in the asset.
As the majority underlying interest in the property that was held immediately before 20 September 1985 has continued to be held, the property will retain its pre-CGT status on transfer into the new wholly owned subsidiary company.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).
