Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051301795765

Disclaimer

You cannot rely on this edited version in your tax affairs. You can only rely on the advice that we have given to you or to someone acting on your behalf.

The advice in the Register has been edited and may not contain all the factual details relevant to each decision. Do not use the Register to predict ATO policy or decisions.

Date of advice: 30 October 2017

Ruling

Subject: Foreign employment income and section 23AG/23AF

Question 1

Is the income earned while working in Country X exempt under section 23AG of the Income tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Answer

No

Question 2

Is the income earned while working in Country X exempt under section 23AF of the ITAA 1936?

Answer

No

Question 3

If the income is exempt, are you required to submit GST and lodge BAS in regards to this income?

Answer

Not Applicable. The income is not exempt income.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 30 June 2017

Year ending 30 June 2018

Year ending 30 June 2019

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2016

Relevant facts and circumstances

You are an Australian resident for income tax purposes.

You are a self-employed contractor based in Country X.

Your spouse is a diplomatic officer of the Country X.

You are travelling on a diplomatic passport, however, you do not have a diplomatic role and are not employed by the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).

You have been issued a work permit.

You are engaged by Company A as a Short Term Advisor (Consultant) in Country X.

The work is a DFAT funded program under the relevant Australian Assistance program.

The work is managed by Company A on behalf of the Commonwealth of Australia.

You are contracted under the Australian Government’s relevant Remuneration Framework to support the delivery of Australia’s development assistance.

The initial contract was for 60 days and it was followed up by a second contract for a term of 2 years.

The Short Adviser Agreement (the Agreement) provides that the Advisor may, with the prior written consent of Company A, engage a person approved by Company A (a Nominated Representative), as an employee or consultant, to provide any part of the Service for or on behalf of the Advisor, on terms consistent with the Engagement Conditions.

The Agreement states that if the Advisor fails to supply the Services in accordance with the Engagement Conditions, the fees will be reduced to reflect the reduced level of Services provided to Company A or the loss suffered by Company A as a consequence of that failure, as is reasonably assessed by the company.

The Agreement states that the Professional Fee and Management Fee are calculated monthly and the fee for a particular month will be paid in arrears on the 21st day of the month following the month in which Company A receives and accepts a properly rendered tax invoice from the Advisor.

Your work in Country X is not an approved project and does not have an approved project number as it is funded by DFAT.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 23AG

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 23AF

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Subsection 23AG(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides that foreign earnings are exempt from income tax where all of the following requirements are satisfied:

You are a self-employed contractor based in Country X. You are engaged by Company A as a Short Term Advisor (Consultant).

Subsection 23AG(7) of the ITAA 1936 defines Foreign Service as service in a foreign country as the holder of an office or in the capacity of an employee.

Accordingly, for your payments from work with Company A to be exempt under section 23AG of the ITAA 1936, you must either hold an office or be an employee.

While FC of T V Jayasinghe (2017) is in relation to the International Organisations (Privileges and Immunities) Act 1963, the principles can be applied to your circumstances.

The High Court made the following observations in relation to “holds an office”:

Taxation Ruling TR 2005/16 Income tax: Pay As You Go - withholding from payments to employees considers who is an employee and what factors are taken into consideration when determining who is an employee.

The relationship between an employer and employee is a contractual one. It is often referred to as a contract of service. Such a relationship is typically contrasted with the principal/independent contractor relationship that is referred to as a contract for services.

An independent contractor typically contracts to achieve a result whereas an employee contracts to provide their labour (typically to enable the employer to achieve a result).

The Courts have considered the common law contractual relationship between parties in a variety of legislative contexts, including income tax, industrial relations, payroll tax, vicarious liability, workers compensation and superannuation guarantee.

As a result, a substantial and well-established body of case law has developed on the issue. There are often many relevant facts and circumstances, some pointing to a contract of service, others pointing to a contract for services.

In determining who is an employee there are 6 main things to take into consideration:

The control test is for determining the nature of the relationship between a person who engages another to perform work and the person so engaged is the degree of control which the former can exercise over the latter.

A common law employee is told not only what work is to be done, but how and where it is to be done. The mere fact that a contract may specify in detail how the contracted services are to be performed does not necessarily imply an employment relationship. In fact, a high degree of direction and control is not uncommon in contracts for services.

The results test indicates where the substance of a contract is to achieve a specified result; there is a strong (but not conclusive) indication that the contract is one for services.

The power to delegate or subcontract (in the sense of the capacity to engage others to do the work) is a significant factor in deciding whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor.

If a person is contractually required to personally perform the work, this is an indication that the person is an employee.

If an individual has unlimited power to delegate the work to others (with or without the approval or consent of the principal), this is a strong indication that the person is engaged as an independent contractor.

Where the worker bears little or no risk of the costs arising out of injury or defect in carrying out their work, he or she is more likely to be an employee. On the other hand, an independent contractor bears the commercial risk and responsibility for any poor workmanship or injury sustained in the performance of work. An independent contractor often carries their own insurance and indemnity policies.

Your foreign engagement as a contractor will not meet the definition of Foreign Service for the purposes of section 23AG of the ITAA 1936.

You are a self-employed contractor; your engagement with Company A does not create an employer and employee relationship, principal and agent partnership or joint ventures.

Accordingly, the income earned while working in Country X is not exempt under section 23AG of the ITAA 1936.

Question 2

Subsection 23AF(1) of the ITAA 1936 provides that foreign earnings are exempt from income tax where all of the following requirements are satisfied:

Your income is not exempt from tax in Australia under section 23AF of the ITAA 1936 as you are not engaged in an approved project and a project number has not been officially allocated to the role you are undertaking.

Accordingly, the income you derive while carrying out services as an independent contractor is not exempt from tax under either section 23AG or 23AF of the ITA 1936 and therefore must be included in your Australian tax return.

Question 3

This question is not applicable as the income earned while working in Country X is not exempt under section 23AF/23AG of the ITAA 1936.

For more information in relation to GST, please go to www.ato.gov.au and search QC 22411.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).