Disclaimer This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law. You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4. |
Edited version of your written advice
Authorisation Number: 1051302866730
Date of advice: 1 November 2017
Ruling
Subject: Whether you are entitled to GST credits relating to payments made by third parties to your barrister for legal expenses that you incurred
Question
Are you entitled to an amount of $X of GST credit (also known as input tax credit) relating to payments made by third parties to your barrister for legal expenses that you incurred?
Answer
No. You are not entitled to any amount of GST credit (input tax credit).
Relevant facts and circumstances
You have been registered for Goods and Services Tax (GST) from at all relevant times, account for GST on a cash basis and report quarterly.
You have been on the Register of Legal Practitioners and Law Practices and have been carrying on an enterprise as a sole trader lawyer at all relevant times.
You have advised that you were sued as a member of the association.
You have advised that you were not sued in relation to carrying on your enterprise as a sole trader lawyer.
You were the Public Officer of the association at all relevant times.
You engaged a lawyer (barrister) to act for you and other parties (4th to 10th Defendants) in the litigation. You were the 11th Defendant. You have stated that you engaged the barrister as the principal and not as agent for any other person or entity.
The 4th to 10th Defendants were also sued and were your clients in the litigation. You have provided a copy of a court ruling which names you as solicitor for the 4th to 11th Defendants.
Legal expenses were incurred for the barrister’s services for the litigation
Your barrister was registered for GST at the time the legal expenses were incurred.
You have advised that “I had an agreement with [barrister] that I would not be personally liable for his fees as instructing solicitor to him in the litigation”. Payment was to be limited to any funds received from the liquidator of the association. You have advised that there was no formal written agreement with your barrister and this verbal agreement was recorded in an email but you no longer have a copy of this email.
On the basis of a letter from you to the liquidator and a response, you were not entitled to receive any monies arising from the liquidation of the association.
You, your barrister, the 4th to 10th Defendants and other parties to the litigation entered into a Deed of Settlement. One of the things agreed to under the Deed of Settlement was the application of funds arising from the liquidation of the association. You have provided to us an undated and unsigned copy of this Deed of Settlement but not an executed Deed of Settlement.
You, your barrister and various other parties entered into a Deed (deed) on a particular date. The deed stated in part:
2. The 4th-11th Defendants covenant with each other and with [your barrister and another barrister] to forthwith lodge a proof of debt with the liquidators to the Association for repayment of all monies advanced by them to the Association.
3. The 4th-11th Defendants covenant with each other and with [your barrister and another barrister] that all monies to be received by them consequent upon lodging proofs of debt or otherwise pursuant to the proposed Deed of Settlement shall be paid to [you] to be held in trust by him and to be disbursed by him solely and irrevocably in accordance with the terms of this Deed.
4. The 4th-11th Defendants hereby covenant with [your barrister and another barrister] to pay each of them the sum of [$Y] in consideration of:
(a) [another barrister] acting in the proceeding for the 1st Defendant;
(b) [your barrister] acting in the proceeding for the 4th-11th Defendants;
and [your barrister and another barrister] covenant with the 1st and 4th-11th Defendants to receive such sum, provided it is paid in full, in discharge of their fees for acting in the Proceeding.
The liquidator paid $Z, to your barrister in accordance with the deed except that it was paid directly rather than to you to be held in trust for your barrister.
You have provided a tax invoice and adjustment note (tax invoice) on behalf of your barrister which states that the total of legal expenses incurred was $Y, including GST, and an amount of $Z was paid which reduced the amount owing. An adjustment was then made reducing the price of the supply to $Z, including GST of $X, so that the resulting balance of the account was nil.
You submitted an application for a private ruling asking if you are entitled to amount of $X in GST credits (also known as input tax credits) relating to payments made by third parties to your barrister for legal expenses. You received a partly favourable decision.
You submitted an objection to the private ruling. The outcome of the objections process is that we are reconsidering your application for a private ruling due to a new material fact. This is that you were acting as solicitor for the 4th to 10th Defendants in the litigation.
A check of the Register of Legal Practitioners & Law Practices of the Victorian Legal Services Board shows you listed as a legal practitioner currently.
Relevant legislative provisions
A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act)
● Section 9-15
● Section 11-5
● Section 11-20
Reasons for decision
Summary
You are not entitled to an input tax credit because you did not make a creditable acquisition.
The barrister’s supply of services to you was not a creditable acquisition because you did not provide any consideration and you were not liable to provide any consideration.
Detailed reasoning
Section 11-20 of the GST Act states that you are entitled to the input tax credit for any creditable acquisition that you make.
Section 11-5 of the GST Act states that you make a creditable acquisition if
● you acquire anything solely or partly for a creditable purpose; and
● the supply of the thing to you is a taxable supply; and
● you provide or are liable to provide consideration for the supply; and
● you are registered or required to be registered for GST.
By engaging the services of the barrister as principal you became liable to provide consideration for the supply of the barrister’s services.
By entering into the informal costs agreement with the barrister, you were no longer personally liable for the legal expenses incurred for the barrister’s services for the litigation.
You did not provide any consideration and you were not liable to provide consideration as you had no entitlement to monies arising from the liquidation of the association.
The 4th to 10th Defendants had a liability to provide consideration for the barrister’s fees. Entering into the Deed meant that the 4th to 10th Defendants had a liability to provide consideration for the barrister’s fees. The subsequent payment to the barrister of monies payable by the liquidator to the 4th to 10th Defendants provided consideration that discharged their liability not yours.
Your acquisition of the barrister’s services was not a creditable acquisition because you do not satisfy paragraph 11-5(c) of the GST Act and, as such, you have no entitlement to an input tax credit under section 11-20 of the GST Act.
Copyright notice
© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia
You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).