Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051303901230

Date of advice: 6 November 2017

Ruling

Subject: Residency of self-managed superannuation fund

Question

Is the Fund an Australian superannuation fund for the purposes of subsection 295-95(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) for the 2017-18 income year?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ending 30 June 2018

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2017

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Fund is a self-managed superannuation fund.

The Fund was established in Australia in the 2009-10 income year.

The Fund has several members (The Members).

The Members of the Fund are Trustees of the Fund.

Member 1 performs the high level duties and activities as trustee of the Fund.

In late 2015, one of the Members (Member X) departed Australia to take up a work secondment overseas.

Member X anticipates returning to Australia in late 2018 from the work secondment.

Member X will not perform any of the high level duties and activities as trustee of the Fund whilst overseas.

Some of other Members intend to visit Member X whilst overseas for no more than four weeks in the next 12 months.

Member X does not intend to make any contributions to the Fund, (nor have any contributions been made on their behalf), for the period they will be overseas.

During the relevant time, well over 50% of the total market value of the Fund’s assets attributable to superannuation interests held by active members is attributable to superannuation interests held by active members who are Australian residents.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 295-95

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 295-95(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 295-95(2)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 295-95(2)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 295-95(2)(c)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subparagraph 295-95(2)(c)(i)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subparagraph 295-95(2)(c)(ii)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 295-95(3)

All references are to the ITAA 1997 unless otherwise indicated.

Reasons for decision

Summary

The Fund satisfies all the tests set out in subsection 295-95(2) and is therefore an Australian superannuation fund for income tax purposes for the 2017-18 income year.

Detailed reasoning

Australian superannuation fund

In accordance with subsection 295-95(2), a superannuation fund is an Australian superannuation fund at a time and for an income year in which that time occurs if:

is attributable to superannuation interests held by active members who are Australian residents.

Subject to the Fund meeting all of the above three tests during the relevant period, the Fund will be an Australian superannuation fund.

If a fund fails to satisfy any one of the tests at a particular time, it will not be an Australian superannuation fund at that time, even if it satisfies the other two conditions.

The Commissioner has issued Taxation Ruling TR 2008/9 entitled Income tax: meaning of ‘Australian superannuation fund’ in subsection 295-95(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (TR 2008/9). The ruling represents the Commissioner’s interpretation of the definition of ‘Australian superannuation fund’. In particular, it provides guidance on the meaning of central management and control (CM&C) and active member.

Test One: The fund is established in Australia or any asset of the fund is situated in Australia

The first test that must be satisfied is that either the fund was established in Australia, or any asset of the fund is situated in Australia at the relevant time. This is a question of fact.

In this case, the Fund was established in Australia and therefore satisfies the requirement in paragraph 295-95(2)(a).

Test Two: The CM&C of the fund is ‘ordinarily’ in Australia

The second test, that a superannuation fund must satisfy to be an ‘Australian superannuation fund’ at a particular time, is that the CM&C of the fund is ‘ordinarily’ in Australia. Generally, the location of where important decisions are made is the location of the relevant management and control.

The concept of CM&C is not defined in the ITAA 1997 or in the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936). In addition, the Explanatory Memorandum to the Tax Laws Amendment (Simplified Superannuation) Act 2007 (which inserted section 295-95) does not provide any guidance as to its meaning. Therefore, it must be given its ordinary or common law meaning. The policy intention of the amendment was to simplify the scope of the superannuation fund residency definition and give effect to a minor policy change in respect of the application of the CM&C test.

The concept of CM&C was developed by the courts as a common law rule for determining the residence of a company.

To determine the location of the CM&C of a fund at a point in time, it is necessary to consider what constitutes the CM&C of a fund and who it is that exercises the CM&C of a fund.

Paragraph 20 of TR 2008/9 states that the CM&C of a superannuation fund involves the focus on the who, when and where of the strategic and high level decision making processes and activities of the fund. In the context of the operations of a superannuation fund, the strategic and high level decision making processes includes the performance of the following duties and activities:

Establishing who is exercising the CM&C of the fund is a question of fact to be determined with reference to the circumstances of each case. While it is the trustee of the fund which has the legal responsibility, or duty to exercise the CM&C of a superannuation fund, the mere duty to exercise CM&C does not, of itself, constitute CM&C. If the trustee in fact performs the high level duties and activities of the fund, they will be exercising the CM&C of the fund in practice.

In discussing CM&C, TR 2008/9 states at paragraph 26:

The trustee of a fund may seek external advice relating to the performance of their high level duties and activities. Provided that the trustee in fact makes the strategic and high level decisions for the fund, the circumstance that the trustee acts on or is influenced by such advice does not affect the fact that the trustee is exercising the CM&C of the fund.

Based on the facts of this case, Member 1 performs, and will perform the high level and strategic decisions independently and without influence from the Members of the Fund. Therefore it is considered that Member 1 exercises the CM&C of the Fund.

Location of the CM&C

The location of the CM&C of the fund is determined by where the high level and strategic decisions of the fund are made and high level duties and activities are in fact performed (regardless of where the persons exercising the CM&C of the fund actually reside).

Whether the CM&C of a fund is ordinarily in Australia at a particular time, is to be determined by the relevant facts and circumstances of each case. It involves determining whether, in the ordinary course of events, the CM&C of the fund is regularly, usually or customarily exercised in Australia. There must be some element of continuity or permanence if the CM&C of the fund is to be regarded as being ‘ordinarily’ in Australia.

In this case, as Member 1 exercises the CM&C of the Fund in Australia, the CM&C of the Fund is exercised ‘ordinarily’ in Australia. The fact that Member X has been (and will be) temporarily absent from Australia, does not impact (nor will it affect) the fact that the CM&C of the Fund is exercised in Australia and continues to remain in Australia.

The requirement in paragraph 295-95(2)(b) has therefore been satisfied.

Test Three: The ‘active member’ test

The third test that must be satisfied for a fund to be an Australian superannuation fund at a particular time is the ‘active member test’.

In accordance with paragraph 295-95(2)(c), the active member test is satisfied if, at the relevant time:

As defined in subsection 295-95(3), a member is an active member at a particular time if the member is:

The term ‘contributor’ in the definition of active member is not defined. Therefore, it is to be given its ordinary meaning subject to the context in which it appears. The concept of a ‘contributor’ within the context of the active member test is directed at establishing the status of a member as a contributor at a particular point in time, not on the specific act of contributing. If a member is a contributor at a particular time, they will be an active member, irrespective of whether the member is an Australian resident or foreign resident. [Refer: paragraphs 185 and 189 of TR 2008/9].

There have been no contributions to the Fund in respect of Member X while they have been overseas. Further, Member X does not intend to make any contributions to the Fund (nor have any contributions made on their behalf) for the period they will be overseas. That being the case, Member X is not an ‘active’ member.

As per the facts of this case, the other Members of the Fund are ‘active’ members during the relevant period. A fund with an ‘active’ member can apply either method in subparagraphs 295-95(2)(c)(i) and (ii) to determine whether it satisfies the active member test.

In this case, as there are ‘active’ Members are Australian residents who hold more than 50% of the total market value of the Fund’s assets attributable to superannuation interests, the Fund satisfies subparagraph 295-95(2)(c)(i). Accordingly, the ‘active member’ test is satisfied.

Conclusion

As all of the relevant tests mentioned in subsection 295-95(2) have been satisfied, it is considered that the Fund is, and will remain an Australian superannuation fund in the specified income year.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).