Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051306827822

Date of advice: 10 November 2017

Ruling

Subject: GST and employer contributions

Questions

Answers

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Fund was established by Industry under a Deed of Trust (the Deed).

The purpose of the Fund is to facilitate training to provide other benefits to the beneficiaries of the Fund.

Operation of the Fund

Under the Deed an employer can become a “Member” when certain conditions are satisfied. Such employer members of the Fund have an obligation under the Deed to make contributions to the Fund based on a set rate per employee. These contributions form part of the trust Fund.

The use of the trust Fund (including employer Member contributions) is governed by the Deed, which provides for payment of the administration costs of running the Fund and for any other activities authorised by the Deed, including Training Powers.

Under the Deed the Trustee can establish policies and rules relating to the application of the Trust Fund. Some policies and rules currently relate specifically to the exercise of the Trustee’s Training Powers (including providing grants to the eligible employers).

Invoices to employer members are administered by the agent on behalf of the Fund under the terms of the Agreement.

Relevant legislative provisions

Section 9-5 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999

Section 153-15 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999

Reasons for decision

A taxable supply is defined in section 9-5 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) as follows:

(terms marked with asterisks (*) are defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act)

In order to meet the requirement in paragraph 9-5(a) of the GST Act, three things must be satisfied. That is:

Supply

Supply is defined under section 9-10 of the GST Act as ‘any form of supply whatsoever’. The definition is very broad and includes an entry into, or release from, an obligation to do anything; or to refrain from an act; or to tolerate an act or situation but excludes a supply of money unless the money is provided as consideration for a supply that is a supply of money.

Subsection 9-10(2) of the GST Act refers to two aspects of a supply: the thing which passes, such as goods, services, a right or obligation; and the means by which it passes, such as its provision, creation, grant, assignment surrender or release.

Essentially, a supply is something that passes from one entity to another. The supply may be one of particular goods, services or something else that is reflected in an agreement by one party to do something for another.

The fact that ‘supply’ requires something to be passed from one entity to another is largely self-evident in a transaction based tax. However, not all forms of supplies have this characteristic. For instance, paragraph 9-10(2)(e) of the GST Act includes a creation of a right as a supply. The 'creation' of a right does not involve a passing of the right from one entity to another. The action of the supplier causes the recipient to make an acquisition but without anything passing between them.

Proposition 12 in goods and services tax ruling, Goods and services tax: Supplies (GSTR 2006/9) states that transactions that are neither based in an agreement that binds the parties in some way nor involve a supply of goods, services, or some other thing, do not establish a supply.

An agreement that does not bind the parties in some way is not sufficient to establish a supply by one party to the other unless there is something else, such as goods, services, or some other thing, passing between the parties.

Consideration

Consideration is defined in section 195-1 of the GST Act to mean 'any consideration, within the meaning given by sections 9-15 and 9-17, in connection with the supply'.

The definition of consideration in section 9-15 of the GST Act extends beyond payments to include such things as acts and forbearances. It may include payments made voluntarily, and payments made by persons other than the recipient of a supply.

Section 9-15 of the GST Act further provides that a payment will be consideration for a supply if the payment is 'in connection with', 'in response to' or 'for the inducement' of a supply of anything. Thus, there must be a sufficient nexus between a particular supply and a particular payment, which is provided for that supply, for there to be a supply for consideration.

Sufficient nexus

The Commissioner considers that, in the context of the GST Act, the expression 'you make the supply for consideration' has a similar meaning to 'there is consideration for the supply that you make'.

The references in the GST Act to 'supply for consideration' and to 'consideration for a supply' underscore the close coupling between the supply and the consideration that is necessary before a payment will be consideration for a supply.

For a payment to be consideration for a supply there must be a sufficient nexus between the payment made by the payer and a supply made by the payee. Therefore, the existence of a particular supply and a given payment will not necessarily mean that a sufficient nexus exists between that supply and the payment made.

The payment is consideration for a supply if the payment is 'in connection with', 'in response to' or 'for the inducement of' a supply. The test is an objective one.

In determining whether a sufficient nexus exists between supply and consideration, regard needs to be had to the true character of the transaction. An arrangement between parties will be characterised not merely by the description that parties give to the arrangement, but by looking at all of the transactions entered into and the circumstances in which the transactions are made.

Further, in identifying the character of the connection, the word 'for' ensures that not every connection between supply and consideration meets the requirements for a taxable supply. That is, merely having any form of connection of any character between a supply and payment of consideration is insufficient to constitute a taxable supply.

Application to the current case

For the member Employers contributions made to the Fund to be consideration for a supply, there must be a sufficient nexus between the payment made by the participating employer and a supply made by the Fund.

Pursuant to the Deed, member Employers are required to pay regular specified amounts to the Fund.

The Deed is between the Fund and Industry Participants. The employer has not entered into any kind of agreement with the Fund that would impose any binding obligation on the Fund in return for the employer contributions made into the Fund. The contribution is collected by the agent and paid to the Fund in accordance with the agreement between the agent and the Fund.

The Fund uses the employer contributions for the purpose of the delivery of training programs and to provide grants to employers where necessary.

Although the Fund may make supplies pursuant to its company constitution and employer contributions may be considered as consideration when considered independently, we are of the view that there is insufficient nexus between a supply made by the Fund and the contributions made by the employers. Accordingly, based on the facts provided, we consider that the contributions made by the employers pursuant to the Deed are not consideration for a supply made by the Fund.

Therefore, the Fund is not making a supply for when a member employer makes contributions to the Fund.

Given that we have determined that the Fund is not making a taxable supply in relation to the contributions made under the Deed, a tax invoice is not required to be issued by the Fund (and/or by an agent for this contribution). Therefore, we have not considered whether the agent is required to issue a tax invoice as this will only be necessary if a taxable supply was made by the Fund in regards to the employer contributions in the first place.

The contributions do not come within any of the input taxed provisions listed under Division 40 of the GST Act.

The Commissioner of Taxations’ views in regards to section 153-50 are provided in goods and services tax ruling, Goods and services tax: agency relationships and the application of the law (GSTR 2000/37) which states as follows:

Accordingly, given that it has been established that the Fund is not making a taxable supply in relation to the contributions made by the employers, even in the event there was an arrangement that falls with section 153-B of the GST Act between the Fund and RPCF, the nature of the treatment of the contribution will not change.

Accordingly we have not determined in the Private Ruling whether or not the arrangement between the Fund and RPCF is one that falls within section 153-B of the GST Act.

The Commissioner is not of the view that the Fund is making any taxable supplies in regards to the contributions made to the Fund by the Member employers.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).