Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051329030538

Date of advice: 25 January 2018

Ruling

Subject: Trust resettlement

Question

Will execution of the Draft Documents constitute the creation of a new trust or a transfer of a CGT asset, with the meanings of A1, E1 or E2 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ending 30 June 2018

The scheme commences on:

1 July 2017

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Trust was established at a point in time.

There were a number of Deeds of Amendment since the original trust deed was executed.

The trustee with the consent of the appointer intends to amend the trust deed:

Following the execution of the proposed Deed of Amendment as per the above, the Appointor will execute a Nomination of Appointor of the Trust.

No assets are being sold or disposed of as a result of the Deed of Amendment and/or the Nomination of Appointor.

The trust deed gives the trustee the power to make the proposed amendments and the trustee will be exercising their power.

Once the Deed of Amendment is executed, the appointor will have the power execute the Nomination of Appointor and the Appointor will be exercising their power.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) section 104-1

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) section 104-55

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) section 104-60

Reasons for decision

While these reasons are not part of the private ruling, we provide them to help you to understand how we reached our decision.

A trust resettlement will occur for income tax purposes where one trust estate has ended and another has replaced it. The effect of such a resettlement is that a disposal of the trust assets is deemed to occur. In consequence, capital gains could accrue as a result of various CGT events.

The Commissioner has released Taxation Determination TD 2012/21 which was published as a result of the court case CoT v. Clark [2011] FCAFC 5; 2011 ATC 20-236; (2011) 79 ATR 550 (Clark’s case). Whilst Clark’s case dealt with whether changes in a continuing trust were sufficient to treat that trust as a different taxpayer for the purpose of applying relevant losses, TD 2012/21 accepts that the principles set out in Clark’s case have broader application.

TD 2012/21 states that a valid amendment to a trust pursuant to an existing power will not result in CGT event E1 or CGT event E2 happening unless:

The Trust Deed allows for the Trustee to amend the deed and in this case it is accepted that neither of the two exclusions mentioned above apply. An A1 CGT event occurs when an asset is disposed of. No assets are being sold or disposed of as a result of the Deed of Amendment and/or the Nomination of Appointor. Consequently, neither CGT event A1, E1 nor CGT event E2 arises in relation to the changes proposed.

Accordingly, there is no trust resettlement as a result of the change to the trust deed.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).