Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051334038100

Date of advice: 7 March 2018

Ruling

Subject: Replacement Asset Rollover – Extension of Time.

Question

Will the Commissioner exercise his discretion under section 124-75(3)(b) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997) to allow the Trustee of the Trust until 1 year after the date on which the Trust resolves its dispute with the Government Authority in relation to the quantum of compensation for the compulsory acquisition of the leasehold interest in the Property held by the Trust to incur expenditure to acquire another CGT asset under section 124-75(2) of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes, the Commissioner will exercise his discretion under section 124-75(3)(b) of the ITAA 1997 to allow the Trustee until 1 year after the date on which the Trust resolves its dispute with the Government Authority in relation to the quantum of compensation for the compulsory acquisition of the leasehold interest in the Property to incur expenditure to acquire another CGT asset under section 124-75(2) of the ITAA 1997.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Starting 1 July 2017 until 12 months after the date on which the Trust resolves its dispute with the Government Authority in relation to the quantum of compensation for the compulsory acquisition of the leasehold interest in the Property.

The scheme commences on:

The scheme has already commenced.

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Trustee of the Trust attained a leasehold interest in the Property.

The Government Authority compulsorily acquired the Property by way of Gazette Notice, the effect of which was that the Trustee’s interest in the Property was terminated.

The Trustee is entitled to compensation under the relevant legislation.

The Trustee entered into negotiations to determine the amount of the compensation.

Negotiations to determine the amount of the compensation failed.

The Valuer-General was subsequently engaged by the Government Authority to provide an assessment of the compensation payable to the Trustee.

The Trustee filed an application with the Court (the Proceedings) objecting to the Valuer-General's determination of the compensation amount.

The time frame for the settlement of this matter is unknown and difficult to predict.

As at the time of issuing this ruling, the Trustee has received nil compensation in respect of the compulsory acquisition.

The Trustee has not incurred any expenditure to date to acquire a replacement property.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 124-75(3)(b)

Reasons for decision

Paragraph 124-75(3)(b) of the ITAA 1997 provides that one of the requirements for satisfying replacement asset rollover if you receive money for compulsorily acquired asset, is that in incurring expenditure in acquiring a replacement CGT asset, at least some of the expenditure must be incurred:

The Commissioner's views as to when the discretion in paragraph 124-75(3)(b) of the ITAA 1997 will be exercised is set out in Taxation Determination: Income Tax: capital gains: what are ‘special circumstances’ for the purposes of subsection 124-75(3) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 TD (TD 2000/40).

TD 2000/40 states that the expression ‘special circumstances’ by its nature is incapable of a precise or exhaustive definition, and ‘it depends on the facts of each particular case’.

In TD 2000/40, four examples were provided to illustrate the application of the Commissioner’s discretion. Example 3 is extracted as below:

The facts of this case are very similar to Example 3 in TD 2000/4:

In light of the abovementioned considerations, we are of the view that the present case constitutes a ‘special circumstance’ in paragraph 124-75(3)(b) of the ITAA 1997 warranting the Commissioner’s discretion for an extension of time to purchase the replacement asset. The extension period would be 12 months from the date of finalisation of the dispute between the Trustee and Government Authority in relation to the quantum of compensation for the compulsory acquisition of the Property, to incur expenditure to acquire a replacement CGT asset.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).