Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051342333563

Date of advice: 6 March 2018

Ruling

Subject: Superannuation Funds for foreign residents

Question 1

Does the Fund qualify as a ‘superannuation fund for foreign residents as defined in subsection 118-520(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997? If so, is Company B in its capacity as trustee for the Fund excluded from liability to interest and/or dividend withholding tax under paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

If the answer to question 1 is yes, is the interest and/or dividend income derived by Company B in its capacity as trustee for the Fund not assessable and not exempt income under section 128D of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following period:

Year ending 30 June 20XX

The scheme commences on:

xx xx 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Fund

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 128B(3)(jb)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 128D

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 118-520

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1)

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Does the Fund qualify as a ‘superannuation fund for foreign residents as defined in subsection 118-520(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997? If so, is Company B in its capacity as trustee for the Fund excluded from liability to interest and/or dividend withholding tax under paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936?

Detailed reasoning

1. Section 128B imposes liability to withholding tax on income derived by a non-resident that consists of dividend income (subsection 128B(1)), interest income (subsection 128B(2)) as well as other income prescribed in that section.

2. Subsection 128B(3) notes that section 128B will not apply to prescribed categories of income. Relevantly, paragraph 128B(3)(jb) states:

The Fund is a non-resident

3. The Fund is not a resident of Australia for Australian tax purposes. Therefore, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

The Fund is a superannuation fund for foreign residents

4. ‘Superannuation fund for foreign residents’ is a defined term in the ITAA 1936. Section 6 states:

(2) However, a fund is not a superannuation fund for foreign residents if:

        (a) an amount paid to the fund or set aside for the fund has been or can be deducted under this Act;

        (b) a tax offset has been allowed or is allowable for such an amount.

8. The legislation provides no guidance on the meaning of ‘indefinitely continuing’. It is not a technical legal expression, and the ordinary meanings of indefinitely and continuing involve little ambiguity or controversy.

9. The Macquarie Dictionary, [Online], viewed 25 January 2018, www.macquariedictionary.com.au defines ‘indefinitely’ and ‘continuing’ as follows:

- indefinitely, adverb

10. Company B in its capacity as trustee for the Fund has provided declaration that at the time of making this application that the Fund is an indefinitely continuing fund.

11. It is accepted that there is no specific plans for the Fund to cease in the foreseeable future and therefore the Fund will continue to operate in accordance with the Trust Deed for an indefinite period of time. Accordingly, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

12. In Scott v. FCT (No. 2) (1966) 40 ALJR 265; 14 ATD 333, Windeyer J stated (40 ALJR 265 at 278; 14 ATD 333 at 351):

13. In Mahony v Commissioner of Taxation (1967) 41 ALJR 232; (1967) 14 ATD 519, Kitto J stated:

14. In analysing the components of the expression, Kitto J interpreted the term ‘benefit’ to require a purpose narrower than the purpose of conferring benefits in a completely general sense upon employees. The benefit must be characterised by some future purpose. On the same note, a provident fund must relate to a provision against ‘contemplated contingencies’.

15. Kitto J’s statement, and in particular its reference to “other cessation of employment”, is consistent with a conclusion that an entity is not precluded from being a superannuation fund merely because it refunds contributions plus interest on any resignation or dismissal.

16. In Cameron Brae Pty Limited v FCT (2007) 161 FCR 468; [2007] FCAFC 135; 2007 ATC 4936, the Full Federal Court held that the relevant fund was a superannuation fund for the purposes of former section 82AAE of the ITAA 1936. Jessup J at [106] stated:

17. ATO Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2009/67 Income Tax: Superannuation fund for foreign residents (ATO ID 2009/67) refers to these authorities to provide guidance on the meaning of the phrase “provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund”:

18. The above establish that for a fund to qualify as a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund, it must have the sole purpose of providing retirement benefits or benefits in other allowable contemplated contingencies (such as death, disability or serious illness). If a fund provides benefits in other circumstances, it will not satisfy the requirement to be a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund.

20. The purpose of the Fund is to provide retirement benefits to members who are an employee of the Employer (Company A). The retirement eligibility allows member benefits to be provided upon reaching retirement age. The alternate circumstances of access, being retirement due to disability, early retirement from employment and death also align with the contemplated contingencies of a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund.

21. The Fund’s core purpose is to provide superannuation benefits to present and future employees and any office-holders of Company A in the event of their retirement notwithstanding the Fund also provides ancillary purposes such as provision of benefits on early retirement from employment, payment on total and permanent disablement, temporary total disablement and payment on death.

23. The Fund was established in Country A as the pension fund for the Employer (Company A). The fund was established solely for the purpose of providing retirements and related benefits for such for the present and future employees and office-holders of the principal employer, Company A in Country A.

24. It is considered that the possibility of a very small number of members being returned residents or becoming Australian residents after ceasing eligible employment is incidental and should not be taken to conclude that the Fund, in this case, has not been established and is not maintained only to provide benefits for non-residents, based on the rules and operation of the Fund.

26. Paragraphs 20 and 21 of Taxation Ruling TR 2008/9 Income tax: meaning of ‘Australian superannuation fund’ in subsection 295-95(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (TR 2008/9) states in respect of the central management and control (CM&C) of a superannuation fund:

27. Paragraph 6 of the Draft Taxation Ruling TR 2017/D2 Income tax: Foreign Incorporated Companies: Central Management and Control test of residency (TR 2017/D2) states:

28. Central management and control is the control and direction of a company's operations. The key element is the making of high-level decisions that set the company's general policies, and determine the direction of its operations and the type of transactions it will enter.

29. The Fund is domiciled in Country A. The objective of the Fund is to provide retirement and related benefits for employees and office holders of the Employer (Company A). The trustee in charge of the Fund is a company incorporated under Country A laws and the central management system and control and all the high level decision making processes of the Fund are carried outside of Australia.

30. Based on the above mentioned factors, it is reasonable to conclude the central management and control of the Fund occurs in Country A by entities that are not Australian residents.

32. An amount paid to the Fund or set aside for the Fund has not been or cannot be deducted under the ITAA 1936 or ITAA 1997 and tax offsets have not been allowed or is not allowable for such amount.

Consists of interest and/or dividends paid by a company that is a resident

34. Paragraph 128B(3)(jb) will only apply to interest, or to dividends paid by Australian resident companies.

35. The Fund will receive interest income, along with dividend income from companies who are residents of Australia for tax purposes.

Is exempt from income tax in the country in which the non-resident resides

37. The Fund is exempt from income tax in Country A in accordance with the laws of Country A.

Conclusion

39. The Fund qualifies as a superannuation fund for foreign resident pursuant to section 118-520. Furthermore, as all the requirements of paragraph 128B(3)(jb) are satisfied, Company B in its capacity as trustee for the Fund will be entitled to an exemption under paragraph 128B(3)(jb).

Question 2

If the answer to question 1 is yes is the interest and/or dividend income derived by Company B in its capacity as trustee for the Fund not assessable and not exempt income under section 128D of the ITAA 1936?

Detailed reasoning

41. Section 128D provides that, inter alia, where withholding tax would be payable but for the operation of paragraph 128B(3)(jb), the income is not assessable income and is not exempt income.

42. As discussed in Question 1, Company B in its capacity as a trustee for the Fund, will be entitled to an exemption under paragraph 128B(3)(jb).

43. Therefore, the interest and dividend income derived by Company B in its capacity as trustee for the Fund from the Fund’s Australian investments will not be assessable income or exempt income under section 128D because the aforementioned income is income that would have been subject to withholding tax but for paragraph 128B(3)(jb).

Conclusion

44. As the requirements of paragraph 128B(3)(jb) have been met, the interest and dividend derived in Australia by Company B in its capacity as trustee for the Fund is not assessable and not exempt income under section 128D.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).