Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051354704018

Date of advice: 29 March 2018

Ruling

Subject: Otherwise deductible rule

Question One

Is a reduction in taxable value available under the ‘otherwise deductible rule’ pursuant to section 24 of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) for expenditure that is incurred by an Employee and reimbursed by the Employer?

Answer

Yes.

Question 2

Where expenditure that is incurred by an Employee and reimbursed by the Employer consists of two separate components, can the taxable value of the total expenditure be reduced by the ‘otherwise deductible rule’ pursuant to section 24 of the FBTAA?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

1 April 2017 to 31 March 2022

The scheme commences on:

1 April 2017

Relevant facts and circumstances

An Employee has incurred expenses.

The Employer reimburses the Employee for the expenses incurred and includes the full amount of the reimbursement as an expense payment fringe benefit in the relevant year’s Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) return.

Under the Employer’s Expense Reimbursement Policy, the Employer pays the Employee a reimbursement allowance to the value of $X per year to cover the expenses incurred.

Relevant legislative provisions

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 20

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Section 24

Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Subsection 136(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 8-1

Reasons for decision

Question One

Summary

A reduction in taxable value is available under the ‘otherwise deductible rule’ pursuant to section 24 of the Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 (FBTAA) for expenditure that is incurred by an Employee and reimbursed by the Employer.

Detailed reasoning

An ‘expense payment fringe benefit’ is defined in subsection 136(1) of the FBTAA to mean a fringe benefit that is an expense payment benefit. That same provision defines an ‘expense payment benefit’ as a benefit referred to in section 20 of the FBTAA. Section 20 of the FBTAA states that an expense payment benefit may arise in either of two ways:

The benefit arises at the time when the provider makes the payment discharging the obligation to the third party, or makes the reimbursement payment.

In the current circumstances, the Employer (the ‘provider’) reimburses the Employee (the ‘recipient’) for expenditure incurred by the Employee, thus constituting an expense payment fringe benefit pursuant to section 20 of the FBTAA.

Under section 24 of the FBTAA, the taxable value of an expense payment fringe benefit provided to an employee may be reduced to the extent to which the employee would have been entitled to a ‘once-only’ income tax deduction for the expenditure concerned had it not been paid or reimbursed by the benefit provider. This is known as the ‘otherwise deductible rule’. A ‘once-only’ deduction is one that is wholly or partly allowable in one year for the expenditure, and not in any other year.

An expense payment fringe benefit is reduced by the ‘notional deduction’ which is, as specified in paragraph 24(1)(ba) of the FBTAA, the difference between the deduction that would be allowable if the employee had paid the whole of the expenditure incurred and had not been reimbursed for any part of it (the ‘gross deduction’) and the actual deduction allowable to the employee for the expenditure.

In the present circumstances, the Employee has incurred expenses in the course of gaining or producing their assessable income.

As the expenses have been incurred by the Employee in gaining or producing their assessable income, these expenses would be ‘otherwise deductible’ to the Employee in their personal income tax return under section 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 had the Employer not reimbursed the expenditure.

The Employer reimburses the Employee for the expenses incurred.

Therefore, section 24 of the FBTAA applies to reduce the taxable value of expenditure that is incurred by the Employee and reimbursed by the Employer.

Question Two

Summary

On the same basis as concluded in the response to Question One, where expenditure incurred by an Employee and reimbursed by the Employer consists of two components, and that expenditure was incurred by the Employee in gaining or producing their assessable income, the taxable value of the total expenditure may be reduced by the ‘otherwise deductible rule’ pursuant to section 24 of the FBTAA.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).