Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051385286261

Date of advice: 15 June 2018

Ruling

Subject: Superannuation fund for foreign residents

Question 1

Is the Fund exempt from liability to withholding tax on interest, dividend and non-share dividend income under paragraph 128B (3)(jb) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Is interest, dividend and non-share dividend income derived by the Fund not assessable and not exempt income of the Fund under section 128D of the ITAA 1936?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 30 June 20XX

Year ended 30 June 20XX

Year ended 30 June 20XX

Year ended 30 June 20XX

The scheme commences on:

Year ended 30 June 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Fund

The Regulations

Other

Assumption

N/A

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 6(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 paragraph 128A(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 paragraph 128B(3)(jb)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 128D

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 118-520

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 995-1(1)

Further issues for you to consider

N/A

Anti-avoidance rules

Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 contains anti-avoidance rules that can apply in certain circumstances where you or another taxpayer obtain a tax benefit or imputation benefit in connection with an arrangement.

If Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 applies the tax benefit or imputation benefit can be cancelled, for example, by disallowing a deduction that was otherwise allowable.

We have not fully considered the application of Part IVA of the ITAA 1936 to the arrangement you asked us to rule on, or to an associated or wider arrangement of which that arrangement is part.

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Is the Fund exempt from liability to withholding tax on interest, dividend and non-share dividend income under paragraph 128B (3)(jb) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936)?

Detailed reasoning

Section 128B of the ITAA 1936 imposes liability to withholding tax on income derived by a non-resident that consists of dividend income (subsection 128B (1) of the ITAA 1936), interest income (subsection 128B (2) of the ITAA 1936) as well as other income prescribed in that section.

Subsection 128B (3) of the ITAA 1936 notes that section 128B of the ITAA 1936 will not apply to prescribed categories of income. Relevantly, paragraph 128B (3) (jb) of the ITAA 1936 states:

The Fund is a non-resident

The Fund is not a resident of Australia for tax purposes. Therefore, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

The Fund is a superannuation fund for foreign residents

Superannuation fund for foreign residents is a defined term in the ITAA 1936. Section 6 of the ITAA 1936 states:

Subsection 995-1 of the ITAA 1997 sets out the following:

Section 118-520 of the ITAA 1997 states the following:

(2) However, a fund is not a superannuation fund for foreign residents if:

Consequently, for the Fund to be considered a superannuation fund for foreign residents for the purposes of paragraph 128B (3) (jb) of the ITAA 1936, it must be established that:

The Fund is an indefinitely continuing fund

The legislation provides no guidance on the meaning of ‘indefinitely continuing’. It is not a technical legal expression, and the ordinary meanings of indefinitely and continuing involve little ambiguity or controversy.

The Macquarie Dictionary, [Online], viewed 23 October 2017, www.macquariedictionary.com.au defines ‘indefinitely’ and ‘continuing’ as follows:

The Regulations provide no indication that there is an intention for the Fund to end at a defined point in time. Therefore, it is accepted that the Fund will continue to operate in accordance with the Regulations for an indefinite period of time.

The Fund is a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund

In Scott v. FCT (No. 2) (1966) 40 ALJR 265; 14 ATD 333, Windeyer J stated (40 ALJR 265 at 278; 14 ATD 333 at 351):

In Mahony v Commissioner of Taxation (1967) 41 ALJR 232; (1967) 14 ATD 519, Kitto J stated:

In Cameron Brae Pty Limited v FCT (2007) 161 FCR 468; [2007] FCAFC 135; 2007 ATC 4936, the Full Federal Court held that the relevant fund was a superannuation fund for the purposes of former section 82AAE of the ITAA 1936. Jessup J at [106] stated:

ATO Interpretative Decision ATO ID 2009/67 Income Tax: Superannuation fund for foreign residents (ATO ID 2009/67) refers to these authorities to provide guidance on the meaning of the phrase ‘provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund’:

The above establish that for a fund to qualify as a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund, it must have the sole purpose of providing retirement benefits or benefits in other allowable contemplated contingencies (such as death, disability or serious illness).

The purpose of the Fund is to provide benefits to members. The Regulations provide the circumstances under which members can obtain benefits from the Fund. The payment of retirement benefits is allowed upon members reaching the specified retirement ages and years of service. Further, the Commissioner accepts that the alternate circumstances of access in this case, such as ill health or death, align to the contemplated contingencies of a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund.

The limited ability to withdraw the funds for service of less than 2 years is not considered inconsistent with a ‘provident benefit superannuation’ purpose. The ability to withdraw nominal amounts is a common administrative feature of retirement funds to ensure efficiency and viability of member’s benefits, which would otherwise be lost to ongoing administrative fees. This feature is considered purely an ancillary or incidental arrangement of the retirement scheme and cannot be considered, in the absence of any other indicators, inconsistent with the Fund being a ‘provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund’.

As both the objective of the Fund and the actual operation of the Fund have the purpose of providing retirement benefits or benefits in alignment with other contemplated contingencies, the Fund is considered to be a provident, benefit, superannuation or retirement fund.

Therefore, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

The Fund was established in a foreign country

The Fund was established in a country that is not Australia. Therefore, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

The Fund was established and is maintained only to provide benefits for individuals who are not Australian residents

The Fund was established to provide employees in a country other than Australia, and is a scheme payment for pensions and other benefits.

It is considered that the possibility of a very small number of members being returned residents or becoming Australian residents after ceasing eligible employment is incidental and should not be taken to conclude that the Fund, in this case, has not been established and is not maintained only to provide benefits for non-residents, based on the rules and operation of the Fund.

Therefore, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

The Fund’s central management and control is carried on outside Australia by entities none of whom is an Australian resident

Paragraphs 20 and 21 of Taxation Ruling TR 2008/9 Income tax: meaning of ‘Australian superannuation fund’ in subsection 295-95(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (TR 2008/9) states in respect of the central management and control of a superannuation fund:

Furthermore, paragraph 6 of Draft Taxation Ruling TR 2017/D2 Income tax: Foreign Incorporated Companies: Central Management and Control test of residency (TR 2017/D2) states:

The objective of the Fund is to provide pensions to employees and former employees of the employer in a country that is outside Australia.

The Fund’s control and direction is from the Authority. The Authority established ABC to manage the Fund. ABC makes decisions about the funds overall policy and investment strategy. Also, the administration of the investments is undertaken by the investments team of The Authority. The Authority is not located in Australia.

Based on the above factors it is reasonable to conclude that the central management and control of the Fund occurs outside of Australia by entities who are not Australian residents.

Therefore, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

No amount paid to the fund or set aside for the fund has been or can be deducted under the ITAA 1997 and no tax offset has been allowed or is allowable for such an amount

An amount paid to the Fund or set aside for the Fund has not been and cannot be deducted under the ITAA 1997. A tax offset has not been allowed nor would be allowable for any amount paid to the Fund or set aside for the Fund.

Therefore, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

Consists of interest or dividend and/or non-share dividends paid by a company that is a resident

Paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the ITAA 1936 will only apply to interest, or to dividends and non-share dividends paid by Australian entities.

The Fund will receive interest income, along with dividend and non-share dividend income from companies who are residents of Australia for tax purposes.

Therefore, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

Is exempt from income tax in the country in which the non-resident resides

The Fund is exempt from taxation in accordance with laws in its country of residence as a tax exempt Pension Fund.

Therefore, the Fund will satisfy this requirement.

Conclusion

As all the requirements of paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the ITAA 1936 are satisfied, the Fund will be entitled to an exemption under paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the ITAA 1936.

Question 2

Reasons for decision

Section 128D of the ITAA 1936 states:

Section 128D of the ITAA 1936 provides that, inter alia, where withholding tax would be payable but for the operation of paragraph 128B(3)(jb) of the ITAA 1936, the income is not assessable income and is not exempt income.

The interest and dividend income derived by the Fund from its Australian investments will not be assessable income or exempt income under Section 128D of the ITAA 1936 because the aforementioned income:

Conclusion

The interest and dividend income derived by the Fund is not assessable and not exempt income of the Fund under Section 128D of the ITAA 1936.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).