Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051388128173

Date of advice: 21 June 2018

Ruling

Subject: Pre-CGT status of business sold

Question

Was the sale of the business a sale of a pre-CGT asset for the purpose of the Taxpayer’s tax return for the income year ending on 30 June 201Z?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following period

Year ending 30 June 201Z

The scheme commences on:

201Z

Relevant facts and circumstances

Company A (Current Trustee) is a trustee of Trust A (the Taxpayer).

Trust A was established in mid-198X by Taxpayer A as founder and Company B as trustee.

Company B was registered in mid-198X and acted as the trustee of Trust A until around 199Y, when the trustee of Trust A was changed to the Current Trustee.

From 198X until it was sold the Taxpayer operated a business that provided infrastructure and marketing to support transport drivers in providing transportation services to individuals and small groups of individuals (the Business).The various elements of the Business included:

This Business was sold to a third party in early 201Z (sale completion date)

Since 198X to the sale completion date, Trust A has implemented new tools to enhance the Business in light of technological advancements and invested in technologies to improve the business’ operations. It also made acquisitions of other small business operators during its existence, where the operations of those operators have been absorbed into the core of the Business.

The extracts from the application provide evidence toward the nature of these business acquisitions. They state that:

These acquisitions were done to improve the operations and infrastructure of the business and were an extension of its earlier activities.

There was no significant change in the majority underlying ownership of relevant trusts from 199A to the present.

Assumptions

From September 198B to 199A, no significant changes in beneficiaries have occurred in the relevant trusts.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 104-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 108-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 149

Reasons for decision

Summary

We are satisfied that the goodwill of the business has stayed consistent since its pre-CGT operations and that no significant change in the business’ nature has occurred. Because of this consistency the sale of the business will constitute a sale of a pre-CGT asset for the income year ending 30 June 201Z and will be able to disregard CGT event A1 as per Subsection 104-10(5) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997).

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 104-10(5) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a capital gain or capital loss you make from CGT event A1 is disregarded if you acquired the asset before 20 September 1985, this would be considered to be a sale of a pre-CGT asset. In the current case we must determine the pre-CGT status of the asset (the Business), which is dependent on whether or not there has been a significant change in goodwill.

Goodwill is a CGT asset, pursuant to paragraph 108-5(2)(b) of the ITAA 1997.

According to Taxation Ruling TR 1999/16 Income Tax: capital gains: goodwill of a business (TR 1999/16) has the legal definition of goodwill which was established by the High Court in Federal Commissioner of Taxation v. Murry 98 ATC 4585; (1998) 39 ATR 129 (Murry Case).

Paragraph 12 of TR 1999/16 states in part that:

Paragraph 89 of TR 1999/16 provides guidance on the consequences of goodwill of a business being one CGT asset. It states that:

Paragraph 90 of the TR 1999/16 outlines the requirement of consistent majority underlying ownership since pre-CGT date of an asset to maintain its pre-CGT status. It states that:

With the assumptions taken into consideration we are satisfied in the consistency of the majority underlying ownership of the asset and so, with regards to the paragraph stated above, it would retain its pre-CGT status,

Paragraph 60 and 64 to 66 of TR1999/16 outlines the goodwill of introductions to new practices and operations within pre-CGT businesses and their treatment in relation to the original business’s pre-CGT status. These paragraphs state:

The acquisitions of the business post-CGT did not significantly change the underlying goodwill of the business, the main goal and effect of these new business operations was to simply improve the existing operations. The facts of the case mirror the example outlined in paragraph 65 above with the business acquisitions being integrated into one whole consolidated business and treated as one entity with the same ongoing goodwill as the original pre-CGT business. Since there has been no change in the essential character of the pre-CGT business the goodwill of the post-CGT business acquired will be subsumed and is taken to have been acquired before 20 September 1985.

The entirety of a business’ goodwill must be either pre-CGT or post-CGT with no apportionment being applicable (see paragraph 96 of TR 1999/16). The whole of the goodwill of a business that commenced before 20 September 1985 remains the same single pre-CGT asset (subject to Division 149 of ITAA 1997- about when an asset stops being a pre-CGT asset) provided the same business continues to be carried on.

Based on the facts presented, it is clear that the core operations of the Business pre-CGT were to ensure that the transportation services provided by vehicle operators are supported by necessary infrastructure. From our view, the additions to the company post-CGT did not change the underlying goodwill of the company. The implementation of new tools was to enhance the business in light of technological advancement and did not change the nature and essence of the business. This consistency in the goodwill of the business means that its disposal would be a sale of a pre-CGT asset for the purpose for the year ending on 30 June 201Z.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).