Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051390425541

Date of advice: 29 June 2018

Ruling

Subject: WET Producer Rebate and GST Subdivision 153-B Arrangements

Question 1

Will the proposed agency arrangement between the Agent and the Principal constitute an arrangement to which Subdivision 153-B of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) will apply?

Answer

Yes, the proposed agency arrangement between the Agent and the Principal will constitute an arrangement to which Subdivision 153-B of the GST Act will apply.

Question 2

Will the Principal be able to claim producer rebates on:

Answer

Yes, you will be able to claim producer rebates for both wholesale and retail sales of wine and the commissions paid to the Agent will not reduce the price for which the wine is sold.

This ruling applies for the following period:

1 July 20xx to 30 June 20xx

The scheme commences on:

1 July 20xx

Relevant facts and circumstances

Relevant legislative provisions

A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999 Division 9

A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999 Division 19

A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 Subdivision 153-B

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Detailed reasoning

Subdivision 153-B of the GST Act allows entities to have arrangements under which an intermediary is treated as the supplier or acquirer for GST purposes only. To qualify, the arrangement must be of the type described in subsection 153-50(1) of the GST Act. An entity can be an intermediary for the purposes of subsection 153-50(1) of the GST Act regardless of whether the entity is the agent of the principal (see subsection 153-50(2) of the GST Act).

Subsection 153-50(1) of the GST Act states:

(c) for the purposes of the GST law:

(d) in the case of supplies to third parties:

The Principal and the Agent have provided a general summarised description of the terms of a proposed written agreement which they plan to execute in the future at an unspecified future date.

The parties have advised that the proposed written agreement will:

The parties have also advised that the written agreement will cease to have effect if either of the Agent or the Principal ceases to be registered for GST.

If the parties enter into a written agreement that is materially the same as the proposed terms detailed in the ‘Relevant facts and circumstances’ section of this private ruling, that future written agreement will satisfy the requirements in section 153-50 of the GST Act.

Question 2

Detailed reasoning

Eligibility for the producer rebate

Division 19 of the A New Tax System (Wine Equalisation Tax) Act 1999 (WET Act) sets out the circumstances where wine producers are entitled to a producer rebate for certain dealings in wine. The rebate is provided in the form of a WET credit.

Section 19-5 of the WET Act specifically lists the eligibility criteria and states that an entity is entitled to claim a producer rebate for rebatable wine for a financial year if:

Rebatable wine

Per section 33-1 of the WET Act, ‘rebatable wine’ means grape wine, grape wine products, fruit or vegetable wine, cider or perry, mead or sake.

We understand the Principal will be producing a wine product that meets the definition of one of the product types listed in the definition of rebatable wine. Therefore this element will be satisfied.

Producer of rebatable wine

Section 33-1 of the WET Act defines a ‘producer’ of rebatable wine as an entity that manufactures the wine, or supplies to another entity the source product from which the wine is manufactured.

Where the Principal entity engages another entity to manufacture wine on its behalf, but retains ownership of the inputs and the resultant wine, the Principal entity would be considered a producer of rebatable wine. Additionally, where the Principal entity blends wine purchased from third parties with wine made from the contracted entity, this constitutes manufacture and the Principal entity would again be considered the producer of rebatable wine. Therefore, the first requirement is met.

Liability to wine tax

The Assessable Dealings Table in section 5-5 of the WET Act sets out all of the assessable dealings that can be subject to wine tax. It includes wholesale sales and retail sales of wine. These dealings will only be taxable if the entity that has the dealing is registered or required to be registered for GST.

Where the Principal, who is registered for GST, intends to make wholesale sales or retail sales of its wine to third parties under its proposed agency arrangement, such sales would be classified as either assessable dealing AD1a or AD2a respectively and would be subject to wine tax.

Where the third party provides a quote to the Principal and states in that quote that it intends to have a taxable dealing with the wine, whilst the Principal won’t be liable to wine tax on that dealing, the Principal would have been liable to wine tax had the third party not quoted.

Therefore in both of the above situations the second eligibility requirement is met.

Source product ownership

For grape wine, the term ‘source product’ is defined in section 19-5(4) of the WET Act to be fresh grapes from which the grape wine is produced. Therefore for a grape wine to satisfy this eligibility requirement, 85% by volume of the final packaged wine must have originated from fresh grapes that were 100% owned by the producer immediately prior to crushing until the wine is placed in its final container.

The Principal uses fresh grapes it owns to produce its wine. In some instances, third party wine is blended with the Principals own wine to produce an alternate blend, however use of third party wine would generally not comprise more than 15% by volume of the final wine. For both products mentioned, the Principal maintains ownership of at least 85% of the source product from crushing through to packaging. Therefore in both situations, the third eligibility requirement would be satisfied.

Where use of third party wine exceeds 15%, the Principal would not satisfy the source product ownership requirement, as the Principal does not own the source product that comprises at least 85% of the finished wine.

Packaging requirements

As the Principal will be selling wine in a container suitable for retail sale that has a volume of 5 litres or less and will be branding the container with an identifiable trademark owned by them, the fourth and fifth eligibility requirements would be satisfied.

Conclusion

Subject to our comments in each sub section above, the Principal will meet the eligibility criteria listed in subsection 19-5 of the WET Act and will therefore be eligible to claim the producer rebate.

Calculating the correct amount of your producer rebate

Pursuant to section 19-15 of the WET Act, the amount of a producer rebate depends on the type of dealing with the wine:

Whilst a Subdivision 153-B arrangement exists between the Principal and the Agent, for WET purposes either wholesale or retail sales would be made by the Principal to the third party.

Wholesale sales

Calculation of the correct amount of the producer rebate requires us to determine when the wine is sold to the purchaser and at what price the wine is sold. In this case it is important to understand who the wine is sold to, in order to determine when the sale occurs.

Paragraph 96 of WETR 2009/1 states that in broad terms, a sale of wine occurs for the purposes of the WET Act when ownership is transferred from one person (the seller) to another (the purchaser) for a ‘price’.

Whilst the Agent will be invoicing the third party purchaser, there is no transfer of ownership between the Agent and the third party and the transfer of ownership actually occurs between the Principal and the third party. Therefore this is the time the sale of wine occurs and it is the price at this point that needs to be considered.

Section 33-1 of the WET Act specifies that the word ‘price’ is to take the meaning given by section 9-75 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (GST Act) which defines ‘price’ as the sum of:

‘Consideration’ is defined under section 9-15 of the GST Act as including:

Paragraph 89 of WETR 2009/1 also states that the phrase ‘the price for which the wine is sold’ means the total amount that the buyer promises, expressly or tacitly to pay to get good title to the wine. Based on this, it is the price that the third party buyer pays to the Principal to obtain title to the wine that is considered ‘the price for which the wine is sold’. In practice, we would assume this would be the wholesale price of the wine.

Retail sales

For retail sales, the ‘notional wholesale selling price’ needs to be considered to determine the amount of the producer rebate. Section 9-25 of the WET Act states that there are 2 methods for working out the notional wholesale selling price being either the half retail price method or the average wholesale price method. The specific calculation methodologies are contained in sections 9-35 and 9-40 of the WET Act respectively.

Per paragraphs 143 and 147 of WETR 2009/1, both of these methods require consideration of the ‘price’ for which the wine is sold, which is discussed in paragraph 89 of WETR 2009/1. As mentioned above, ‘the price for which the wine is sold’ means the total amount that the buyer promises, expressly or tacitly to pay to get good title to the wine.

As with the position for wholesale sales above, it is the price that the third party buyer pays to the Principal to obtain title to the wine that is considered ‘the price for which the wine is sold’. For retail sales using the half retail price method, this is generally the retail price the wine is sold for. For retail sales using the average wholesale price method, this is generally the wholesale price the wine is sold for.

Once the price of the wine is determined, the remaining calculation requirements for the relevant calculation methodology can be applied. For example, if the half retail price method is chosen, the Principal would calculate the producer rebate based on 50% of the retail price of the wine sold.

Commission

The Principal also pays a commission to the Agent on the completion of sales. Paragraph 123 of WETR 2009/1 states that commission fees do not reduce the price for which the wine was sold and cannot be deducted from the taxable value of the wine. In your circumstances, the commission fee does not reduce the price for which the wine was sold.

Other costs

The information provided also mentions that various costs are expected to be incurred by the Agent at the specific instruction of the Principal. These costs will be invoiced to the Agent by third party suppliers and will then be on charged to the Principal. As these costs would relate to dealings between the Principal and the Agent and not dealings between the Principal and the third party purchaser, these costs would not impact the price for which the wine is sold.

Conclusion

To summarise the above, for wholesale sales, the Principal (subject to satisfying the eligibility criteria) can claim the producer rebate on the wholesale price for which the wine is sold without a reduction for commissions paid to the Agent or the costs charged back to the Principal by the Agent.

For retail sales, the Principal (subject to satisfying the eligibility criteria) can claim the producer rebate using the price for which the wine was sold without a reduction for commissions paid to the Agent or the costs charged back to the Principal by the Agent. This amount can then be used to calculate the amount of the rebate using the selected calculation methodology.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).