Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051396177104

Date of advice: 10 July 2018

Ruling

Subject: Sovereign immunity

Question 1

Is ForCo immune from liability to income tax and withholding tax under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity on any income and capital gains derived from its investment in the units of AusTrust and the loans that it has made to AusTrust?

Answer

Yes.

Question 2

Is ForCo immune from liability to income tax and withholding tax under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity on any income and capital gains derived from its investment in the shares of AusCo and the loans it has made to AusCo?

Answer

Yes.

This ruling applies for the following periods:

Year ended 30 June 2018

Year ended 30 June 2019

The scheme commences in:

May 2018

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Sovereign Fund

The Sovereign Fund Holding Structure

HoldingCo

ForCo

AusTrust

AusCo

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 128B

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 4-1

Reasons for decision

Question 1

For Australian income tax and withholding tax purposes, it is accepted that the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies to a foreign government or an agency of a foreign government that engages in governmental functions. This approach is consistent with the decision of the British House of Lords in the case / Congreso del Partido [1981] 2 All ER 1064 which held that activities of a trading, commercial or other private law character were not governmental functions.

When determining whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies to provide immunity from income and/or withholding tax in respect of Australian sourced income and gains, it is necessary to establish the following:

If these three conditions are satisfied, the Australian sourced income or gains will not be subject to Australian income and/or withholding taxes.

Condition 1: Foreign government or an agency of a foreign government

The relevant entities have been established by the foreign State to advance the objectives of the foreign State and are owned by the State. Based on these facts and circumstances, it is accepted that the Sovereign Fund, HoldingCo and ForCo are agencies of the Government of the State for sovereign immunity purposes.

Condition 2: Moneys are and will remain government moneys

In line with the principle that sovereign immunity applies to foreign states performing only governmental functions, an entity claiming sovereign immunity must establish that the monies being invested are and will remain government monies.

The funds used by the relevant entities in all of their investments are reserve funds of the State. The income generated by the relevant entities on the investment of the State reserve funds is either re-invested or distributed to the Government of the State. No distributions of income or gains have been made or can be made to any person other than the Government of the State.

As such, it is accepted that the monies invested are and will remain government monies.

Condition 3: Non-commercial transaction

When determining whether the doctrine of sovereign immunity applies to provide immunity for Australian sourced income and gains from Australian income tax and/or withholding tax, it is necessary to establish that the income or gain is being derived from a non-commercial activity.

As noted in ATO Interpretive Decision ATO ID 2002/45 Withholding Tax: Sovereign Immunity (ATO ID 2002/45) whether an operation or activity is a commercial transaction will depend on the facts of each case. As a guide, a commercial transaction is generally considered to be an activity concerned with the trading of goods and services, such as buying, selling, bartering, transportation, and includes the carrying on of a business. On the other hand, income derived by a foreign government or by any other body exercising governmental functions from interest bearing investments or investments in equities is generally not considered to be income derived from a commercial operation or activity.

In relation to the ownership of shares in a company or other similar equity interests, there will be instances where the extent of the holding gives rise to questions as to whether the interests constitute a passive investment or a commercial investment.

In all circumstances, consideration will be given to factors relating to the influence or control potentially able to be exercised by the investor (or a related party/associate of the investor) in relation to the investment. This includes (but is not limited to) any potential influence or control in relation to day to day management and key business, strategy and financial decisions.

Given the proportion of ownership interest held, it is important to consider what influence it has over the decisions made amongst the investors members.

ForCo, has elected to irrevocably and unconditionally waive its rights in relation to a number of matters under the Trust Investor Deed which would otherwise allow it to influence decisions pertaining to the operation of AusTrust. While it has retained rights to have an Observer attend board meetings, the Observer is forbidden to speak or vote during board meetings. Further, the Observer will not have input into the agenda of board meetings in advance of such meetings.

ForCo will hold veto power in relation to Investor Reserved Matters which require a vote in favour of the resolution by Investors holding, in aggregate, not less than 90% of investor interests. The Commissioner accepts that the matters listed in as Investor Reserved Matters, over which ForCo would hold effective veto power, do not go beyond mere investor protection matters.

Based on the facts and circumstances, the Commissioner accepts that the income or gains derived by ForCo from its investment in the AusTrust is from a non-commercial activity.

Therefore, condition 3 has been satisfied.

Conclusion

ForCo is immune from income tax and withholding tax under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity on any income and capital gains derived from its current investment in AusTrust.

Question 2

As identified in the answer to question 1, the Commissioner accepts that ForCo is an agency of a foreign government and that the moneys being invested are and will remain government moneys.

Condition 3: Non-commercial transaction

ForCo, has elected to irrevocably and unconditionally waive its rights in relation to a number of matters under the AGD which would otherwise allow it to influence decisions pertaining to the operation of AusCo. While it has retained rights to have an Observer attend board meetings, the Observer is forbidden to speak or vote during board meetings. Further, the Observer will not have input into the agenda of board meetings in advance of such meetings.

ForCo will hold veto power in relation to Investor Reserved Matters which require a vote in favour of the resolution by Investors holding, in aggregate, not less than 90% of investor interests. The Commissioner accepts that the matters listed in as Investor Reserved Matters, over which ForCo would hold effective veto power, do not go beyond mere investor protection matters.

Based on the facts and circumstances, the Commissioner accepts that the income or gains derived by ForCo from its investment in AusCo is from a non-commercial activity.

Therefore, condition 3 has been satisfied.

Conclusion

ForCo is immune from income tax and withholding tax under the common law doctrine of sovereign immunity on any income and capital gains derived from its current investment in AusCo.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).