Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051411813972

Date of advice: 14 September 2018

Ruling

Subject: Division 7A

Question

If the proposed Sub-Trust Investment Deed is implemented by 30 June 2019, would the unpaid present entitlement described in the ‘Proposed Sub-trust Arrangement’ be considered a ‘loan’ to which section 109D, Division 7A of Part III of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) applies?

Answer

No

This ruling applies for the following periods:

27 June 20xx to 30 June 20xx

The scheme commences on:

27 June 20xx

Relevant facts and circumstances

The Trust

The Trust is an entity that has been established to carry on property development activities.

Pursuant to those property development activities, the Trust has entered into a series of contracts to purchase a development site with multiple titles, which are expected to settle progressively (collectively, the Land).

The Trust intends to develop and subdivide the Land before selling the lots to homeowners and investors. This is expected to take a number of years to complete. The proceeds received will be based on arms’ length commercial transactions.

ABC Pty Ltd owns 50% of the shares in the trustee of the Trust. E and F each own 50% of the shares in ABC Pty Ltd.

E is a Director of the trustee of the Trust.

The Private Company

The Private Company is a discretionary beneficiary of the Trust.

The Private Company was established to carry on property development projects. The majority shareholders of the Private Company will continue to use the Private Company to conduct their property development activities in the future. The majority shareholders also control the Trust, which commenced its operations prior to the incorporation of the Private Company.

XYZ Pty Ltd as trustee for the XYZ Trust owns the majority of the shares in the Private Company. E and G each own 50% of the shares of XYZ Pty Ltd.

E is a director of the Private Company.

Proposed Sub-Trust Arrangement

The Trust expects to receive income for the income year ending 30 June 20xx.

The trustee of the Trust will resolve to make its discretionary beneficiary, the Private Company, presently entitled to the trust income for the income year ending 30 June 20xx (proposed Distribution Minutes of The Trust).

The present entitlement will not be immediately paid. Accordingly, the Private Company will have an unpaid present entitlement (UPE) equivalent to the amount of the present entitlement.

The trustee of the Trust and the Private Company will establish a sub-trust arrangement in respect of the UPE (Proposed Sub-Trust Arrangement).

The trustee of the Trust and the Private Company will enter into a Sub-Trust Investment Deed (proposed Sub-Trust Investment Deed) in respect of the sub-trust arrangement.

The proposed Sub-Trust Investment Deed provides:

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Division 7A of Part III

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 109D

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 109D(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 paragraph 109D(1)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 109D(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 318

Reasons for decision

Summary

The Proposed Sub-Trust Arrangement is acceptable. The Private Company’s UPE will not be taken be a loan to the Trust within the meaning of section 109D of the ITAA 1936 and therefore will not be a loan to which Division 7A of Part III of the ITAA 1936 applies.

Detailed reasoning

One of the purposes of Division 7A of Part III of the ITAA 1936 is to ensure that private companies are not able to make distributions of profits to shareholders (or their associates) in the form of non-arm's length loans instead of in the form of dividends that would be assessable to the shareholder.

To achieve this purpose, subsection 109D(1) of the ITAA 1936 states:

A ‘loan’ includes a loan within its ordinary meaning (an ‘ordinary loan’), consisting of a payment and an obligation to pay. In addition, for the purposes of Division 7A the meaning of loan is extended by subsection 109D(3) of the ITAA 1936 which defines ‘loan’ for the purposes of Division 7A to include:

A beneficiary can become presently entitled to an amount from a trust pursuant to a direct term of the relevant trust deed, or as a result of the trustee of the trust exercising a power under a trust deed to make the beneficiary so entitled (usually by resolution). In these situations the funds to which the beneficiary is made presently entitled can remain unpaid and continue to be held on trust for that beneficiary until such time as the beneficiary calls for actual payment of the amount. This entitlement is commonly referred to as an unpaid present entitlement (UPE).

Taxation Ruling TR 2010/3 Income tax: Division 7A loans: trust entitlements (TR 2010/3) provides the Commissioner’s views on when a private company with a UPE from an associated trust estate will be taken to have made a loan to that trust within the meaning of subsection 109D(3) of the ITAA 1936, in circumstances where funds representing that UPE remain intermingled with funds of the trust.

Guidance on the administration of TR 2010/3 is contained in Practice Statement Law Administration PS LA 2010/4 Division 7A: trust entitlements (PS LA 2010/4).

TR 2010/3 considers in what circumstances a private company is taken to 'make a loan' within the meaning of subsection 109D(3) of the ITAA 1936 to the trustee of a trust, where:

As stated in paragraphs 17 and 18 of TR 2010/3 and paragraph 11 of PS LA 2010/4, a subsisting UPE is not an ‘ordinary loan’, however it may be a loan under the extended definition of loan in subsection 109D(3) of the ITAA 1936 for the purposes of Division 7A.

In some circumstances where a UPE exists, a private company beneficiary provides financial accommodation to the trustee of a trust, or enters into a transaction with the trustee of a trust which in substance effects a Division 7A loan by the private company to the trustee of the trust.

Paragraph 19 of TR 2010/3 states financial accommodation will be provided by a private company beneficiary to the trustee of a trust in which it has a UPE if under a consensual agreement the private company supplies or grants some form of pecuniary aid or favour to the trust and a principal sum or equivalent is ultimately payable to the private company.

Further, paragraph 97 of TR 2010/3 states:

Accordingly, where financial accommodation is provided as discussed above, there will be a Division 7A loan to the trustee of the trust by the private company (paragraph 23 of TR 2010/3).

However, paragraph 49 of PS LA 2010/4 provides that a UPE will not be considered a loan to which Division 7A applies if funds representing the UPE are held on sub-trust for the sole benefit of the private company beneficiary.

TR 2010/3 defines a sub-trust as being a separate trust arising in equity, in respect of which the private company is the sole beneficiary and upon which amounts that the private company is presently entitled to receive from another trust (called the main trust) are held. TR 2010/3 explains the following in relation to sub-trusts:

If the private company beneficiary allows funds representing UPEs to be used in aid of, or in favour of the trust, rather than for the sole benefit of the private company beneficiary, this is a form of financial accommodation. This is the case even if there is a sub-trust in respect of the UPE.

Therefore, certain criteria must be met in order to demonstrate that funds in a sub-trust are held for the sole benefit of the private company beneficiary. PS LA 2010/4 states:

Proposed Sub-Trust Arrangement

The trustee of the Trust is an associate (as defined in section 318 of the ITAA 1936) of the Private Company. Therefore, the UPE owing from the Trust to the Private Company will become a loan to which Division 7A applies to the extent that:

As stated previously, a UPE will not be considered a loan to which Division 7A applies if funds representing the UPE are held on sub-trust for the sole benefit of the private company beneficiary.

In this case, the Trust and the Private Company propose establishing a Sub-Trust Arrangement whereby the funds representing the Private Company’s UPE will be held on sub-trust and will be invested in a specific investment. A Sub-Trust Investment Deed will be entered between the Trust and the Private Company in respect of the UPE and its investment.

To demonstrate that the funds in the sub-trust are held for the sole benefit of the Private Company, the funds must be invested on commercial terms and all benefits from the investment must flow back to the sub-trust and to the Private Company as the beneficiary of the sub-trust.

As stated in the proposed Sub-Trust Investment Deed, the funds representing the UPE in the sub-trust must not be used for any other purpose other than in connection with the acquisition and development of the Land. The Trust will purchase, develop and subdivide the Land before selling the lots to homeowners and investors.

In return for the investment of its UPE, the Private Company is entitled to the return of its UPE regardless of the success or otherwise of the investment. In addition, the Private Company is entitled to its share of profit from the investment which is calculated by reference to the proportion the UPE Funds represent of the total equity used to fund the investment.

Under the proposed Sub-Trust Investment Deed the UPE and any profit payment are not required to be paid to the Private Company until the End Date of the Sub-Trust Investment Deed. The Trust may however make pre-payments to the Private Company in respect of its UPE and share of profits prior to the End Date.

To ensure that the Trust does not benefit from ‘interim profits’ from any land sales that occur prior to the End Date (and therefore prior to the requirement to pay the Private Company its entitlements), the proposed Sub-Trust Investment Deed requires any interim profit from the investment of the UPE Funds to be reinvested in the investment for the sole benefit of the Private Company or to be prepaid to the Private Company towards the profit payment.

It is considered the proposed Sub-Trust Investment Deed ensures that the UPE in the sub-trust is held for the sole benefit of the private company beneficiary, and that the UPE is not used in aid of or in favour of the Trust.

The Proposed Sub-trust Arrangement in respect of the UPE is acceptable. The Private Company will not be taken to have made a loan to the Trust within the meaning of section 109D of the ITAA 1936 and therefore the UPE will not be a loan to which Division 7A of Part III of the ITAA 1936 applies.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).