Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051427878687

Date of advice: 9 October 2018

Ruling

Subject: Deductible gift status as a private ancillary fund.

Question 1

Will the proposed Investment Option 1 be considered a suitable investment for the Trustee for X Foundation (X Foundation) to maintain its deductible gift recipient (DGR) endorsement as a private ancillary fund (PAF) described in item 2 of the table in section 30-15 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes

Question 2

Will the proposed Investment Option 2 be considered a suitable investment for the Trustee for X Foundation (X Foundation) to maintain its deductible gift recipient (DGR) endorsement as a PAF described in item 2 of the table in section 30-15 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following periods

Year ending 30 June 20XX

Year ending 30 June 20XX

Year ending 30 June 20XX

The scheme commences on

1 July 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

The X Foundation has been registered as a charity with the Australian Charities and Not-for-Profits Commission (ACNC) from 1 January 20XX and endorsed with the ATO as a tax concession charity since 20XX. The X Foundation has also been endorsed as a DGR from 20XX as a PAF covered by item 2 of the table in section 30-15 of the ITAA 1997.

A unit trust, B Limited as trustee for the C Trust (C Trust) wholly owns vacant land.

The unit holders of C Trust are currently as follows:

XXXX units – E Pty Ltd as trustee for D Family Trust (D Trust). The directors and shareholders of E Pty Ltd are individual F and his spouse.

XXXX units – G Pty Ltd as trustee for the H Family Trust (H Trust). The directors and shareholders of G Pty Ltd are individual J and his spouse.

XXXX units – K Pty Ltd (K). The directors and shareholders of this entity are individual N and his spouse.

The beneficial owners of the units of C Trust are the D Trust, H Trust and K.

The shareholders and directors of B Limited, the trustee company of C Trust are:

Directors

Shareholders

The vacant land was originally part of a large parcel of land acquired in 20XX by C Trust for the following investment purposes:-

Two of the current unit holders of C Trust, G Pty Ltd and K, have expressed a desire to:-

The D Trust does not wish for C Trust to sell the land and would prefer to have the land developed for rental purposes. Unfortunately, the D Trust is not in a financial position to acquire the units held by G Pty Ltd and K in C Trust and to undertake the development of the property on its own.

Individual F was one of three directors of the company, R Pty Limited, such company acting as trustee of X Foundation which is a trust established under a Trust Deed to be a PAF.

The Trust Deed is governed by the laws of the State of X The Trustee for the X Foundation applied for DGR endorsement for the X Foundation as a whole as a PAF, undertaking to comply with the current Private Ancillary Fund Guidelines 2009 (PAF Guidelines) as formulated under section 426-110 in Schedule 1 of the Taxation Administration Act 1953. The X Foundation was originally set up by Individual S who donated considerable sums to the Foundation.

Individual F is no longer a director or shareholder in R Pty Limited as per ASIC records provided with application for private ruling at Annexure B. He is also no longer a responsible person of the

X Foundation as per the ACNC Portal Extract also supplied, at Annexure C.

The two directors of R Pty Limited are currently two unrelated parties.

These two individuals are also the responsible persons of the X Foundation.

Proposed Investment

Investment Option 1

Investment Option 2

Therefore, the intentions of the Trustee of the X Foundation are as follow:-

Independent advice from a financial adviser will be obtained prior to the X Foundation making an investment in C Trust and the investment will only proceed if the financial adviser confirms the arrangement is an appropriate investment for a PAF with prospects of a reasonable return.

A Unitholders Agreement will be prepared to limit the X Foundation’s risk and exposure to the investment. It will stipulate:

A developer to build the apartments has not yet been approached. Although Individual F will be involved, benefit and take part in the development and rental of the completed apartments, his involvement will be commensurate with the D Trust’s 33 1/3% interest in C Trust. Individual F will not receive any payment from C Trust for any services he might provide.

Early indications are that the land is suitable for the construction of X number apartments.

The building costs are estimated to be $X of which the Foundation would provide from available funds either one third or two thirds depending upon whether X Foundation acquires a one third or two third’s equity in the C Trust. The C Trust will not be borrowing any funds and the land will not be used as security for any loans by the unit holders.

The net assets of X Foundation as at 30 June 20XX were $X. After completion of the apartments and allowing for charitable distributions and growth in asset values over the next two years, X Foundation’s net asset position has been estimated as $X. X Foundation’s investment in C Trust would be either $X or $XX representing X or XX% of X Foundations investments.

Based upon the net assets as at 30 June 20XX, the proposed investment, ignoring any allowance for growth, would be approximately X% or XX% of its investments. This calculation does not reflect the improved value of the completed apartments and growth of assets since 30 June 20XX.

The C Trust has no debt.

The cost of the Trustee of X Foundation acquiring its initial equity in C Trust will be either $X for a one third equity or $XX for a two third’s equity. These amounts are based on the market value of the land which is estimated to be $X. The ultimate market value would be determined by a registered valuer.

The apartments will be managed by an external un-related estate agent.

In the proposed dealings between C Trust and X Foundation, it has been confirmed that:

The following steps are to be undertaken to ensure the purchase of units in C Trust is at arm’s length:

The following documents are relied on in this ruling and their contents, including appendices, form part of these facts:

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 30-15

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 30-B

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 30-125

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 30-125(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 30-125(1)(d)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 30-125(6)

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Schedule 1 section 426-110

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

It is considered that either of the proposed investment strategies of purchasing units of the C Trust by the trustee for X Foundation from one or two of the three unit holders of the C Trust and also providing funds by acquiring additional units to fund either one or two thirds of the cost of developing commercial rental apartments on the land owned by C Trust will be considered a suitable investment for X Foundation, and X Foundation will maintain its DGR endorsement as an PAF described in item 2 of the table in section 30-15 of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

Entitlement to endorsement as a DGR is governed by section 30-125 of the ITAA 1997. Specifically, subsection 30-125(1) of the ITAA 1997 states:

The X Foundation has been registered as a charity with the ACNC from 20XX and endorsed with the ATO as a tax concession charity since 20XX. The X Foundation has also been endorsed as a DGR from 20XX as a PAF covered by item 2 of the table in section 30-15 of the ITAA 1997.

Therefore, X Foundation:

Whether the X Foundation satisfies the PAF Guidelines, as required by paragraph 30-125(d) of the ITAA 1997 is discussed below:

The PAF Guidelines set out the rules that a PAF must comply with in order to be endorsed and remained endorsed as a DGR.

Failure to comply with these guidelines will mean that:

The most relevant PAF Guidelines as they relate to the proposed investment options are considered below.

Current Investment Strategy

Guideline 30 of the PAF Guidelines states the trustee of a PAF must prepare and maintain a current investment strategy for the fund. Specifically, Guideline 30.2 states that the strategy must reflect the purpose and circumstances of the fund and have particular regard to a number of conditions listed. Of those listed, the following is most relevant to the trustee for X Foundation’s proposed investment in the C Trust. It is as follows:

You have supplied an amended investment strategy. The relevant changes which address the requirement to have regard to potential conflicts as per Guideline 30.2 are:

Does anyone connected to the X Foundation, directly or indirectly, benefit from the development of the land?

Guideline 42 prohibits the X Foundation from providing benefits to:

The X Foundation plans to invest in C Trust by one of the following means:

The X Foundation is purchasing units in C trust and is not undertaking any development work. The Trustee for C Trust will contract with builders to construct the units. From the information supplied, there is not any person involved with X Foundation who will benefit personally directly or indirectly from the investment by X Foundation in units of C Trust so as to invoke a breach of Guideline 42.

Carrying on a business

Guideline 40 of the PAF Guidelines prohibits the X Foundation from carrying on a business. However, a fund specifically does not contravene the guideline because of its investment activities such as investment in shares or investment properties for the purposes of deriving income that can be distributed to DGRs

You have made it clear in your investment strategy that the derivation of rental income is the purpose of your investment in C Trust and X Foundation will not be involved in the development and building of the units in any way. However, due to the fact the purchase of the units by the X Foundation may give them control over the C Trust we must consider if the X Foundation is considered to be conducting a business of either property development or of deriving rental income after entering into the relevant investments.

Taxation Ruling TR 97/11 Income tax: am I carrying on a business of primary production?

(TR 97/11) provides the Commissioners view of the factors used to determine if a taxpayer is in business for tax purposes. Its principles are not restricted to questions of whether a primary production business is being carried on.

In the Commissioner's view, the factors that are considered important in determining the question of business activity are:

These indicators must be considered in combination and as a whole and whether a business is being carried on depends on the large or general impression gained from looking at all the indicators, and whether these factors provide the operations with a commercial flavour. The weighting to be given to each indicator may vary from case to case.

Normally the receipt of income from the letting of property to a tenant(s) does not amount to the carrying on of a business.

Whether the letting of property activities amount to the carrying on of a business will depend on the circumstances of each case. Generally, it is easier for a company that derives income from the letting of property to show that it carries on a business than it is for an individual.

You have stated that neither the C Trust nor the X Foundation has any intention to sell the land or the apartments once they are constructed. You have also stated that the original intention of the existing unit holders in the C Trust was that the land be used to build residential apartments for rental purposes. This intention has not changed and is also the intention of the X Foundation. The X Foundation is not interested in developing the property for sale

The purpose of the proposed investment strategies is to develop the land by way of building apartments. The X Foundation will not be involved in the development of the apartments. This will be done by engaging an independent builder. An independent real estate agent will manage the properties once they are built and tenanted.

It is considered that based upon the factors outlined in TR 97/11, the Foundation will not be considered to carrying on a business and breaching Guideline 40 of the PAF Guidelines for the following reasons:

Conclusion

It is considered that either of the proposed investment strategies of purchasing units of C Trust by the trustee for X Foundation and also providing funds by acquiring additional units to fund either one or two thirds of the cost of developing commercial rental apartments on the land owned by the C Trust will be considered a suitable investment for X Foundation, and X Foundation will maintain its DGR endorsement as an PAF described in item 2 of the table in section 30-15 of the ITAA 1997.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).