Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051428149369

Date of advice: 14 September 2018

Ruling

Subject: Small business CGT concessions – basic conditions

Question

Does Company A satisfy the basic conditions for relief described in section 152-10 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes

This ruling applies for the following period

1 July 20XX to 30 June 20XX

The scheme commenced on

1 July 20XX

Relevant facts and circumstances

History of the Business

Company A was incorporated on date X and carried on a business trading under the same name.

The business originally concentrated on sales, earnings and sale commissions.

Company A commenced a different activity which involved the purchase of asset B. Company A contracted on date X to purchase asset B to augment its existing business.

Ownership of Company A

Individual C was the sole and only shareholder and Director of Company A.

The Transaction

On Date X, Company A entered into an Agreement for Sale of asset B to an unrelated third party. for $X. The gross consideration received was $X. The sale included business assets of Company A. Company A ceased trading at the time of the sale. Details of the market value of asset B and the methodology used was provided.

The Calculation of Net Capital Gain on sale of asset B was provided.

Turnover of Company A

Company A had an annual turnover of $X for 20XX financial year and was tracking to exceed $X million in revenue for the 20XX financial year up to the time of sale.

The Assets and Liabilities held by Company A as at X date was provided.

Assets and Liabilities of individual C as at X date was provided.

The assets and liabilities of individual C included assets at their market value at the time of the sale and liabilities pertaining to each asset are also shown in an attachment to the application for private ruling.

The liabilities of individual C include a provision for personal income tax payable by individual C on income derived for the year until the date of sale.

The list of CGT assets of individual C do not include a 100% interest in a property at X address as this property was the principal residence of individual C (subparagraph 152-20(2)(b)(ii) of the

ITAA 1997 exclusion).

The following matters are relevant in respect of the market valuation assigned to the following CGT assets:

Three market valuations were provided for property 1. These values were obtained in the period before the time of sale. All three valuations had a top value of $X.

Sale documents were exchanged for this property on date 20XX. Sale transfer document was provided. The price paid was $X.

Purchase document was provided at date X for a price of $X.

Market values of Share Portfolio were provided as at close of trading on ASX on date of sale of asset B.

The bank loans are not linked a specific investment but used in general investing.

The Estate of the late S

S passed away on date X. Part of S’s Estate was inherited by individual C.

The Estate was still being administered by the executors at the time of the sale of asset B.

Transfer of Property 4

Assignment of legal and beneficial interest in S’s Estate

The applicant has advised that individual C executed the Deed of Assignment prior to the sale of the asset B by Company A.

Individual E

Individual C’s spouse, Individual E, commenced as an employee of Company A on X date and was terminated just before the sale. Individual E was not a Director or shareholder of Company A and had no input in the running of the business.

Other relevant entities

Company A or individual C did not control of any other entities at the time of sale, and they were not controlled by any other entities.

There are no other connected entities for the purposes of Division 152 of the ITAA 1997.

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 108-5(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 108-5(2)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subdivision 152-A

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 152-10

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-10(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 152-10(1)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 152-10(1)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 152-10(1)(c)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subparagraph 152-10(1)(c)(ii)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 152-10(1)(d)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-10(1AA)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-10(1A)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-10(1B)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 152-15

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-20(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subparagraph 152-20(1)(b)(iv)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subparagraph 152-20(2)(b)(ii)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-20(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 152-35

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-35(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-35(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 152-40(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subparagraph 152-40(1)(a)(ii)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subparagraph 152-40(1)(a)(iii)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 152-40(1)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 328-110

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 328-110(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 328-110(4)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 section 328-125

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 328-125(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 328-125(1)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 328-125(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 paragraph 328-125(2)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 328-130(1)

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

Company A (You) satisfies the basic conditions for relief pursuant to section 152-10 of

the ITAA 1997 in respect of the capital gain made on the disposal of asset B.

Detailed reasoning

There are certain capital gains tax (CGT) concessions specifically available to small business taxpayers. There are conditions that must be satisfied to obtain access to the concessions set out in Subdivision 152-A of the ITAA 1997.

The basic conditions are set out in section 152-10 of the ITAA 1997. They are:

These basic conditions are discussed below

(1) Paragraph 152-10(1)(a): a CGT event happens in relation to a CGT asset of yours in an income year

CGT event A1 happened on X date when Company A entered into the Agreement for Sale of asset B to an unrelated third party.

Consequently, the requirements of paragraph 152-10(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997 are satisfied.

(2)Paragraph 152-10(1)(b): the event would (apart from this Division) have resulted in the gain

You have advised that the cost base of the asset B was $X and therefore based on the consideration received of $X under the Agreement for Sale of the asset B, a capital gain arose from the sale of the asset B by Company A.

Consequently, the requirements of paragraph 152-10(1)(b) of the ITAA 1997 are satisfied.

(3) Paragraph 152-10(1)(c): at least one of the following applies:

CGT small business entity is defined in subsection 152-10(1AA) of the ITAA 1997. It states:

Where we refer to section 328-110 of the ITAA 1997 the $XXMillion is shown as $Xmillion for purposes of these Reasons of Decision as per subsection 152-10(1AA) of the ITAA 1997.

“Small business entity” is defined in subsection 328-110(1) of the ITAA 1997. An entity is a small business entity if it:

Company A is not a CGT small business entity for the relevant income year under subsection 328-110(1) of the ITAA 1997 because its aggregate turnover was in excess of $2 million for the 20XX year and is also likely to exceed this threshold in the 20XX year.

A taxpayer may also be a small business entity under subsection 328-110(4) of the ITAA 1997 if its aggregated turnover for the current year, worked out as at the end of the current year, is less than $2 million. However that when applying this method, if an entity starts or ceases a business part way through an income year, it will need to work out its turnover using a ‘reasonable estimate’ of what its turnover would have been if it had carried on the business for the entire income year. Accordingly this test will also not be met in the current circumstances.

This criterion is considered in detail below.

This requirement is not applicable to the current circumstances.

Subsection 152-10(1A) of the ITAA 1997 provides:

Passively held assets - affiliates and entities connected with you

The conditions in this subsection would not appear to be met in the current circumstances primarily because:

Consequently the conditions in subsection 152-10(1A) of the ITAA 1997 will not be satisfied.

Subsection 152-10(1B) of the ITAA 1997 is not relevant as it concerns passively held assets of partnerships.

Maximum Net Asset Value Test - Subparagraph 152-10(c)(ii)

Section 152-15 of the ITAA 1997 sets out the maximum net asset value test. It provides that you satisfy the maximum net asset value test if, just before the CGT event, the sum of the following amounts does not exceed $6,000,000:

A CGT asset is any kind of property, or a legal or equitable right that is not property (subsection 108-5(1)). It also includes part of, or an interest in, such property or rights (paragraph 108-5(2)(a)).

In the current circumstances, to assess whether the maximum net asset value test is met, it is initially necessary to determine which entities may be connected with Company A.

Connected entity

Connected entity is defined in subsection 328-125(1) of the ITAA 1997 as:

There are different control tests in section 328-125 of the ITAA 1997 that apply depending on what type of entity is being tested.

Relevantly, direct control of an entity other than a discretionary trust is defined in subsection 328-125(2) as:

Is Company A connected with individual C?

Individual C is the sole shareholder and Director of Company A and accordingly controls Company A since C owns at least 40% of the equity interests in this company. Therefore because individual C controls Company A individual C is connected with Company A in accordance with paragraph 328-125(1)a) of the ITAA 1997.

Accordingly, as individual C is connected with Company A, it is necessary to include the net value of the CGT assets owned by individual C in the maximum net asset value test.

Is individual C (and in turn Company A) connected with the deceased estate of S.

A beneficiary of an unadministered deceased estate does not own, or have the right to acquire ownership of, interests in the unadministered estate which carry rights to receive any distributions of income or capital. The beneficiary therefore does not control (and hence is not connected with) the estate under paragraph 328-125(2)(a) of the ITAA 1997 (see ATO Interpretative Decision ATOID 2010/106 Income Tax Small business concessions: connected entities – ‘control’ of an unadministered deceased estate).).

According, individual C does not own, or have the right to acquire ownership of, interests in the unadministered estate of S.

CGT assets of the deceased estate

Prior to the sale of the asset B on X date, individual C disposed of individual C’s interest in various CGT assets stemming from the estate as follows:

As a result, based on the information provided, individual C did not hold the relevant interest in these CGT assets just before the relevant CGT event on date X and accordingly these CGT assets would not form part of the CGT assets of individual C for the purposes of the maximum net asset value test.

Based on the information provided, Company A is not controlled by, nor does it control any other entities and therefore is not connected with any other entities.

Affiliates

The maximum net asset value test also includes the net value of the CGT assets of any affiliates of a taxpayer (or entities connected with your affiliates).

Subsection 328-130(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that an individual or a company is an affiliate of yours if the individual or company acts, or could reasonably be expected to act, in accordance with your directions or wishes, or in concert with you, in relation to the affairs of the business of the individual or company.

Whether a person acts, or could reasonably be expected to act, in accordance with your directions or wishes, or in concert with you, is a question of fact dependent on all the circumstances of the particular case. Relevant factors include:

In this regard, it is noted that, there is nothing to suggest from the information provided that individual E would be an affiliate of Company A or individual C.

Calculation of the maximum net asset value

As mentioned above, section 152-15 of the ITAA 1997 provides that maximum net value asset test is satisfied if the sum of the net value of the CGT assets of yours, any entities connected with you, and any of your affiliates or entities connected with your affiliates does not exceed $6,000,000.

It has been established that Company A and individual C are connected with each other.

Subsection 152-20(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides the meaning of net value of the CGT assets. It states:

Subsection 152-20(2) of the ITAA 1997 notes however that the following assets should be disregarded when working out the net value of the CGT assets of an entity: It states:

Based upon the information supplied, Company A satisfies the maximum net asset value test because the net value of its CGT assets and those of individual C (with whom it is connected with) does not exceed $6,000,000.

In relation to this calculation, the following comments are made:

Accordingly, Company A satisfies the requirements of subparagraph 152-10(1)(c)(ii) of the ITAA 1997 and in turn paragraph 152-10(1)(c) of the ITAA 1997.

(4) Paragraph 152-10(1)(d): the CGT asset satisfies the active asset test

Section 152-35 of the ITAA 1997 sets out when a CGT asset qualifies as an active asset:

Subsection 152-40(1) of the ITAA 1997 relevantly defines “active asset” as:

The CGT assets (and in particular asset B) disposed of under the Agreement for Sale of asset B of X date are assets associated with the business of Company A and are therefore an active asset within the above definition.

These CGT assets were owned for 15 years or less and were active assets of Company A for at least half the ownership period (in this case 100% of the ownership period). Accordingly, the CGT assets satisfy the active asset test.

Conclusion

The basic conditions for the small business CGT concessions are set out in Subdivision 152-A of the ITAA 1997. The key basic conditions relevant in this case are the maximum net asset value test and the active asset test.

As discussed above, Company A will satisfy the maximum net asset value test and asset B is an active asset. Therefore, the basic conditions specified in section 152-10 of the ITAA 1997 have been satisfied.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).