Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051435392112

Date of advice: 15 April 2019

Ruling

Subject: Withholding tax - PAYG

Question 1

Is Australian Branch required to withhold an amount under subdivision 12-F of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA 1953) from interest that accrues on funds deposited in a ‘Client Segregated Account’ that is then on-paid to the client by Australian Branch?

Answer

No

Question 2

Is Australian Branch required to withhold an amount pursuant to subdivision 12-F of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 from interest that it receives in a ‘Client Segregated Account’ from an ‘Offshore Permissible Investment’ that is then paid to the client by Australian Branch?

Answer

No

Relevant facts and circumstances

Foreign Company – Business and Australian Branch

Steps of Transaction

Scope of Ruling

On-payment of interest

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 subsection 995-1(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Division 11A of Part III

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 128A

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 128B

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 subsection 128B(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 128AE

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 section 128GB

Tax Administration Act 1953 subdivision 12-F to Schedule 1

Tax Administration Act 1953 section 12-245 to Schedule 1

Tax Administration Act 1953 section 12-250 to Schedule 1

Tax Administration Act 1953 section 12-300 to Schedule 1

Reasons for decision

Legislative references in this Ruling are to provisions of the ITAA 1936, or to provisions of the (Income Tax Assessment Act 1997) ITAA 1997 unless otherwise indicated.

Question 1

Summary

Interest withholding tax under section 128B does not apply to the interest accrued in the Client Segregated Account that is then on-paid to the client. Accordingly, Australian Branch is not required to withhold an amount under Subdivision 12-F of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 from the interest.

Detailed reasoning

An entity is not required to withhold an amount from interest under Subdivision 12-F of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 if no withholding tax is payable in respect of the interest. In particular, section 12-300 of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 says:

This Subdivision does not require an entity:

Section 128B of the ITAA 1936 deals with withholding tax liability. A person who derives income to which section 128B applies that consists of interest is prima facie liable to pay income tax upon that income at the rate declared by the Parliament.

Relevantly, subsection 128B(2) provides:

Subject to subsection (3), this section also applies to income that:

Is income that consists of interest derived by a non-resident?

A requirement of subsection 128B(2) is that the non-resident derives income that consists of interest.

There is no exhaustive definition of ‘interest’ in the ITAA 1936, and therefore ‘interest’ takes its ordinary meaning.

In Riches v Westminster Bank Limited [1947] AC 390; [1947] 1 All ER 469, Lord Wright stated:

Interest has also been described as 'payment by time for the use of money' (Rowlatt J in Bennett v Ogston (1930) 15 TC 374 at 379).

In addition to the ordinary meaning of ‘interest,’ subsection 128A(1AB) extends the meaning of ‘interest’ for the purposes of Division 11A of Part III (the withholding tax provisions) so as to ‘include’ an amount:

The payment to the client by Australian Branch is not a payment of ‘interest,’ either under the ordinary or statutory meaning of ‘interest.’ In particular, the payment is not compensation for the deprivation by the client of the money. It does not represent, in form or substance, what the client might have made if they had the use of the money, or conversely the loss they suffered because they had not that use. Rather, the payment arises because of Australian Branch’s obligation under the client agreement to pass on amounts. The payment is better characterised as a trust distribution.

While the client may not directly receive interest, the client may still ‘derive’ the interest accrued in the Client Segregated Account through the operation of subsection 128A(3).

Subsection 128A(3) states:

Given that the money in the Client Segregated Account is held in trust by Foreign Company for the client under section 981H of the CA 2001, subsection 128A(3) will apply to treat a non-resident beneficiary who is presently entitled to interest included in the income of the trust estate as deriving the interest when the present entitlement arises.

Taxation Ruling IT 2680 Income tax: withholding tax liability of non-resident beneficiaries of Australian trusts discusses how subsection 128A(3) applies to amounts distributed to non-resident beneficiaries of Australian trust estates. As explained in paragraph 22 of IT 2680, the client beneficiary will be presently entitled to income from the trust where the following requirements are met:

It is noted that, although IT 2680 applies only to distributions from Australian trust estates, subsection 128A(3) applies to all trust estates.

‘Interest’ (within the meaning under Part III, Division 11A) in the Client Segregated Account is ‘income of a trust estate’ – specifically, the trust estate of which Foreign Company is the trustee – for the purposes of subsection 128A(3). This is because the money in the Client Segregated Account, which includes the interest referred to above, is received and held in trust by Foreign Company for the benefit of the client pursuant to section 981H of the CA 2001.

Further, the client, as beneficiary, is ‘presently entitled’ to interest that is included in the trust estate under the client agreement. The client becomes ‘presently entitled’ when Foreign Company receives the interest from the third party, such as the affiliate.

Therefore, the effect of subsection 128A(3) is that the client is deemed to have ‘derived’ income that consists of the interest that accrues in the Client Segregated Account.

Does the relevant income satisfy one of the limbs in paragraph 128B(2)(b)?

For withholding tax to apply, the income that is derived by the non-resident client must consist of interest that:

In applying these limbs, it must be determined who is the ‘payer’ of the income derived by the client. Again, the effect of subsection 128A(3), a deeming provision, is important. The approach to be taken to construing a deeming provision is the same as in construing any statute (see Newcastle Airport Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2014] NSWSC 1501 at [55]-[56]). The court must ascertain what parliament meant by the words that it used.

Subsection 128A(3) deems a beneficiary to have derived income consisting of ‘that interest’ included in the income of a trust estate to which the beneficiary is presently entitled. The use of the words ‘that interest’ makes it clear that the deemed state of affairs is not concerned with the derivation of interest in the abstract. Rather, it concerns the very interest that was included in the income of the trust estate and derived by the trustee. Once it is accepted that the effect of the provision is to deem the beneficiary to have derived a specific amount of interest that was derived by the trustee, and not merely an amount of interest in a general sense, it follows that the interest which the beneficiary has derived has the attributes that it in fact possesses (including the attribute of who paid the interest).

Accordingly, the relevant ‘payer’ for the purposes of the paragraph 128B(2)(b) limbs are the third party banks, the affiliates, and the third party brokers that pay the interest to Australian Branch. These entities are offshore entities in the sense that they are not resident in Australia and the interest they pay is not an outgoing incurred by them in carrying on a business through a permanent establishment in Australia. According, neither limb of 128B(2)(b) is satisfied.

Conclusion

Interest withholding tax under section 128B does not apply to the interest accrued in the Client Segregated Account that is then on-paid to the client. Accordingly, Australian Branch is not required to withhold an amount under Subdivision 12-F of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 from the interest.

Question 2

Summary

Interest withholding tax under section 128B does not apply to the interest received in the Client Segregated Account from the Offshore Permissible Investments that is then on-paid to the client. Accordingly, Australian Branch is not required to withhold an amount under Subdivision 12-F of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 from the interest.

Detailed reasoning

As stated above, an entity is not required to withhold an amount from interest under Subdivision 12-F of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 (which includes sections 12-245 and 12-250), if no withholding tax is payable in respect of the interest (section 12-300 of Subdivision 12-F of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953).

Is income that consists of interest derived by a non-resident?

As stated above, on the given Facts, the payment by Australian Branch to the non-resident clients is not a payment of ‘interest.’

However, given that the money in the Client Segregated Account is held in trust by Foreign Company for the client, subsection 128A(3) treats the client as deriving the interest received by the Client Segregated Account when the present entitlement to the income of the trust arises.

The client is presently entitled to interest income received in a Client Segregated Account from an Offshore Permissible Investment under the client agreement. Accordingly, the non-resident client ‘derives’ that income.

Does the income that consists of interest satisfy paragraph 128B(2)(b)?

For the same reasons as above, the non-resident client has derived ‘that interest’ which was paid to Foreign Company. Accordingly, the ‘payers’ of this interest are the Offshore Permissible Investments rather than Foreign Company. The Offshore Permissible Investments are offered by non-resident entities otherwise than in carrying on a business in Australia at or through a permanent establishment in Australia. Accordingly, both limbs of paragraph 128B(2)(b) are not satisfied.

Conclusion on Withholding Tax under subsection 128B(2)

Interest withholding tax under section 128B does not apply to the interest received in the Client Segregated Account from the Offshore Permissible Investments that is then on-paid to the client. Accordingly, Australian Branch is not required to withhold an amount under Subdivision 12-F of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 from the interest.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).