Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051456518561

Date of advice: 26 November 2018

Ruling

Subject: Investors eligibility for tax incentives for early stage investors in innovation companies

Question 1

Does the company the investor, a trust, acquired shares in satisfy the criteria of an Early Stage Innovation Company (ESIC) pursuant to subsection 360-40(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Answer

Yes.

Question 2

Is the investor, a trust, and each of its unit holders, entitled to a tax offset in relation to the acquisition of shares in the innovation company, pursuant to section 360-15 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes.

Question 3

Is each member of the self-managed superannuation funds that are unit holders of the trust entitled to a tax offset in relation to the acquisition of shares in the innovation company, pursuant to section 360-15 of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

No. The trustee of the self-managed superannuation funds would be entitled to the share of the tax offset.

This ruling applies for the following period:

1 July 20XX to 30 July 20XX

The scheme commenced on:

XX XXXX 201X

Relevant facts and circumstances

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997

Corporations Act 2001

Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993

section 62

paragraph 65(1)(b)

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Does the company the investor, a trust, acquired shares in satisfy the criteria of an Early Stage Innovation Company (ESIC) pursuant to subsection 360-40(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997)?

Summary

Yes. The innovation company meets the eligibility requirements of an ESIC under subsection 360-40(1) of the ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

For an investor to be entitled to the tax incentives, the innovation company must qualify as an ESIC. The conditions for a company to qualify as an ESIC at a particular time in an income year are set out in subsection 360-40(1) of the ITAA 1997. The provision specifies that the company must meet at a particular time:

The time referred to is the ‘test time’. In the circumstances, the ‘test time’ for determining if the innovation company would qualify as an ESIC is immediately after the new shares are issued to the Trust – i.e. on or after XX XXXX 201X but before 30 June 20XX.

Early stage test requirements

To meet the early stage test, the innovation company must meet the four requirements outlined in paragraphs 360-40(1)(a) to (d) of the ITAA 1997. These requirements are:

For the purposes of this ruling, the current year is the year ending 30 June 20XX, and the income year before the current year is the year ending 30 June 20XX.

Under the requirement in paragraph 360-40(1)(a) of the ITAA 1997, the company must’ve been incorporated in Australia or registered in the Australian Business Register within the last three income years (the latest being the current income year in which the requirement is tested).

The innovation company satisfies this requirement as it was incorporated within Australia within the last three income years.

Further, the innovation company satisfies the other requirements in paragraphs 360-40(1)(b) to (d) of the ITAA 1997 because:

The innovation company therefore satisfies the early stage test for the income year ended 30 June 20XX.

The Commissioner notes that the Trust had advised him that the innovation company wouldn’t meet the 100-point innovation test. This means that for the innovation company to qualify as an ESIC it must meet the principles-based innovation test.

Principles-based innovation test requirements

To qualify under the principles-based test, the innovation company must meet the five requirements outlined in subparagraphs 360-40(1)(e)(i) to (v) of the ITAA 1997. These requirements are:

Genuine focus on developing one or more new or significantly improved innovations for commercialisation

This requires the innovation company to demonstrate that the innovation it is developing is either new or significantly improved in relation to the addressable market.

The innovation company’s addressable market is considered to be Australia as the innovation company has identified an available revenue opportunity and potential market demand in the finance industry here from the innovation.

In terms of the innovation, the innovation company has identified it as a product and a process for the finance industry with points of difference to the traditional methods and system it seeks to replace.

The methods and system aim to improve security and accuracy, reduce processing times and costs, and diminish the risk of fraud and improve the retention of data in the finance industry.

The Commissioner understands similar technologies exist for use for other products and alternative methods and systems are offered by other organisations for use in the finance industry but acknowledges that the innovation company’s methods and systems for the target product do not have a direct competitor.

It is therefore considered that, based on the observable points of difference, that the innovation company’s innovation is new or a significant improvement to current products and processes that are already available in Australia.

However, the innovation company must be genuinely focused on developing the innovation for a commercial purpose. 'Commercialisation' includes a range of activities that involve the implementation or sale of a new or significantly improved innovation that will directly lead to the generation of economic value for the company.

At the test time the innovation was under development whereas at present the innovation has undergone a trial with a multinational company. At the test time the efforts to develop the innovation for commercialisation included:

Based on the above information it is considered that the innovation company is genuinely focussed on developing the innovation for a commercial purpose. Subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(i) of the ITAA 1997 has therefore been satisfied at the test time.

High growth potential

This requires the innovation company to demonstrate that it has the potential for high growth within a broad addressable market.

The innovation company reports that the market for its methods and system in the finance industry consists is broad within Australia and overseas.

ABS data illustrates significantly high transaction data within the Australia finance industry the methods and system are targeted at.

The innovation company intends for the methods and system to address the domestic Australian market and then expand to the overseas markets in the finance and other industries.

Based on the above information it is considered that the innovation company has high growth potential and satisfies the requirement in subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(iii) of the ITAA 1997 at the test time.

Scalability

This requires the innovation company to demonstrate that it has the potential to successfully scale up its business. This means that the innovation company must have operating leverage, where as it increases its market share or enters into new markets, its existing revenues can be multiplied with a reduced or minimal increase in operating costs.

It is accepted that the innovation company satisfies this requirement under subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(iii) of the ITAA 1997 at the test time. The innovation company has demonstrated through its projections that it has the potential to scale up the business by expanding the scope of its methods and system within Australia and then to the worldwide market. The innovation company intends to expand the methods and system to other products in the finance industry.

The innovation company has indicated that expansion would not require substantial additional resources to achieve as the methods and systems can be readily adapted to the overseas market at minimal cost. The modelling undertaken provides support to these statements to the extent that revenues are forecast to increase with expansion to market share and on entering new markets with a minimal increase to operating expenditure.

Broader than local market

This requires the innovation company to demonstrate that it has the potential to address a market that is broader than a local city, area or region. It must also show that its business can be adapted to a national, multinational or global scale in future.

It is accepted that the innovation company satisfies this requirement under subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(iv) of the ITAA 1997 at the test time. The innovation company has demonstrated that methods and system has the potential to address the finance industry within Australia and that it can be adapted to other products within the marketplace at a multinational or global scale in the future. That is, the methods and system may be tailored to accommodate the requirements of its potential customers both here and abroad.

Competitive advantages

This requires the innovation company to demonstrate that it has the potential to have competitive advantages over its competitors, such as cost or differential advantages, which are sustainable for the business.

It is accepted that the innovation company satisfies this requirement under subparagraph 360-40(1)(e)(v) of the ITAA 1997 at the test time. The innovation company has demonstrated that its product (i.e. the methods and system) is rare and substitute products are not readily available in the marketplace. The innovation company has also sought to protect its product from imitation through the registration of patents.

Conclusion

The innovation company has demonstrated that it satisfies the requirements of the principles-based innovation test in relation to its methods and system for the finance industry. The innovation company therefore qualified as an ESIC pursuant to subsection 360-40(1) of the ITAA 1997 at the test time.

Question 2

Is the investor, a trust, and each of its unit holders, entitled to a tax offset in relation to the acquisition of shares in the innovation company, pursuant to section 360-15 of the ITAA 1997?

Summary

The investor, a trust, and each of its unit holders, would be entitled to a tax offset in relation to the acquisition of shares in the innovation company.

Detailed reasoning

The tax incentives for early stage investors are contained in Division 360 of the ITAA 1997.

One of the incentives for an investor that purchases new shares in an ESIC is a non-refundable carry forward tax offset. Section 360-15 of the ITAA 1997 provides that an investor is entitled to the tax offset in an income year no matter whether the investment is made directly as a corporation, an individual or indirectly through a trust or partnership.

In other words, if the investor is a trust or partnership, special rules in subsection 360-15(2) of the ITAA 1997 apply so that the entitlement to the tax offset flows through to the member of the trust or partnership.

As such, each of the unit holders would be entitled to the tax offset in income year ended 30 June 2017, if the Trust would have satisfied certain conditions if it were an individual.

Subsection 360-15(1) of the ITAA 1997 provides that an investor is entitled to the tax offset for an income year if it satisfies all of the following conditions.

In the circumstances of this case, the trust, has satisfied each of the above conditions. That is:

The unit holders of the Trust would otherwise be entitled to the tax offset. This is, however, subject to whether the trust meets the sophisticated investor test.

Limited entitlement to the tax offset for certain kinds of investor

Section 360-25 of the ITAA 1997 provides that the amount of the tax offset for an investor and their affiliates combined in an income year is equal to 20% of the total amount paid for their qualifying investments up to a maximum offset of $200,000.

However, section 360-20 of the ITAA 1997 provides that, if the investor is not a sophisticated investor under the Corporations Act 2001, the total amount of the investment by the investor cannot exceed $50,000 to be able to access the tax offset.

An entity may be a sophisticated investor if one of the requirements for the removal of the need for a disclosure document in relation to the issue of the shares as described in subsections 708(8), (10) or (11) of the Corporations Act 2001 was satisfied. These requirements for the removal of the need for a disclosure document include the investor:

In the circumstances of this case, the Trust satisfies the meaning of sophisticated investor. The requirement in paragraph 708(8)(a) of the Corporations Act 2001 has been met because the purchase price of the shares in the innovation company exceeded $500,000.

The total amount of the tax offset that all of unit holders combined would be entitled to claim in an income year would therefore be equal to 20% of the $600,000 paid for the qualifying investment.

Members of trusts

Section 360-30 of the ITAA 1997 provides that a member of a trust, including a unit holder, at the end of an income year is entitled to a carry-forward tax offset for that income year, if the trust were an individual and would be entitled to a tax offset for an income year under subsection 360-15(2) of the ITAA 1997.

The amount of the offset is the member’s share of the tax offset as determined by the trustee as a percentage of the notional tax offset amount multiplied by the notional tax offset amount. The notional tax offset amount is the amount of the offset that would be available to the trust if it was an individual as calculated under section 360-25 of the ITAA 1997.

The trustee of the Trust can therefore determine each unit holder’s percentage of the notional tax offset amount. Subsection 360-30(5) of the ITAA 1997 however requires that the sum of all percentages determined in relation to all members does not exceed 100% of the amount that the Trust would be entitled to.

However, if the terms of the Trust provides that a unit holder would be entitled to a fixed proportion of any capital gain if any asset were disposed of at the end of the income year, then the unit holder's share of the tax offset must be equivalent to that fixed proportion under subsection 360-30(5) of the ITAA 1997.

The trustee of the Trust must also give each unit holder written notice of the determination made about their share of the tax offset. The notice must include enough information to enable the unit holder to work out their share of the notional tax offset. This notice must be given to the unit holder within three months of the end of the 2017 income year, or within a further time allowed by the Commissioner under subsection 360-30(4) of the ITAA 1997.

It is further noted that subsection 360-15(3) of the ITAA 1997 provides that a trustee of a trust is entitled to a tax offset for an income year if:

In other words, if any amount of the tax offset has been applied by the trustee against any tax payable on an assessment of the trust, the unit holders of the trust would be entitled to the remaining proportion of the tax offset.

Question 3

Is each member of the self-managed superannuation funds that are unit holders of the Trust entitled to a tax offset in relation to the acquisition of shares in the innovation company, pursuant to section 360-15 of the ITAA 1997?

Summary

The members of the self-managed superannuation funds that are unit holders of the Trust are not entitled to the tax offset. It is the trustee of each of the funds that is entitled to the share of the tax offset.

Detailed reasoning

An investor that is a trust is not entitled to the tax offset pursuant to subparagraph 360-15(1)(a)(i) of the ITAA 1997.

However, the special rules outlined in subsection 360-15(2) of the ITAA 1997 operate such that the members of the trust would be entitled to the tax offset if the Trust would have been so entitled under subsection 360-15(1) of the ITAA 1997 if the Trust were an individual.

This would be so in the circumstances of this case if those unit holders of the Trust were not self-managed superannuation funds.

Where the member of the Trust is itself another trust whose entitlement to the offset, arose by operation of the special rules in subsection 360-15(2) of the ITAA 1997, not subsection 360-15(1) of the ITAA 1997, the offset is not able to pass through to its own members.

It is noted that:

However, prior to the enactment of the amendments, the existing legislation has effect and the incentive cannot flow through to the members of more than one trust.

Further, if the offset were to pass through to the members of the self-managed superannuation funds, there would be concerns about the fund complying with its regulatory requirements. In particular:

As a result, the trustee of the self-managed superannuation fund, and not the members, would be entitled to the share of the tax offset.

Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).