Disclaimer
This edited version has been archived due to the length of time since original publication. It should not be regarded as indicative of the ATO's current views. The law may have changed since original publication, and views in the edited version may also be affected by subsequent precedents and new approaches to the application of the law.

You cannot rely on this record in your tax affairs. It is not binding and provides you with no protection (including from any underpaid tax, penalty or interest). In addition, this record is not an authority for the purposes of establishing a reasonably arguable position for you to apply to your own circumstances. For more information on the status of edited versions of private advice and reasons we publish them, see PS LA 2008/4.

Edited version of your written advice

Authorisation Number: 1051490185140

Date of advice: 15 April 2019

Ruling

Subject: Income tax - Return of capital – Share buy-back

Question 1

Will section 159GZZZN of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (ITAA 1936) apply to Company A such that the Off-Market Share Buy-Back (the Buy-Back) and any subsequent cancellation of the ordinary shares in Company A (Company A Shares) will be disregarded for the purposes of determining whether:

Answer

Yes.

Question 2

Will Company A be taken to have paid Company A shareholders who participate in the Buy-Back (Participating Shareholders) a dividend out of profits derived by it on the day the Buy-Back occurs equal to the Dividend Component pursuant to subsection 159GZZZP(1) of the ITAA 1936?

Answer

Yes.

Question 3

Under subsection 159GZZZP(1) of the ITAA 1936, is the date of the Buy-Back the day the Buy-Back agreement is entered into?

Answer

Yes.

Question 4

Will the Dividend Component paid to the Participating Shareholders constitute a frankable distribution for the purposes of subsection 202-40(1) of the ITAA 1997?

Answer

Yes.

Question 5

Will paragraphs 202-45(a) through to 202-45(j) of the ITAA 1997 apply to treat all or part of the Buy-Back Price as an unfrankable distribution?

Answer

No.

Question 6

Will the Commissioner make a determination under subsection 45A(2) of the ITAA 1936 that section 45C of the ITAA 1936 applies in relation to the whole, or a part, of the Capital Component?

Answer

No.

Question 7

Will the Commissioner make a determination under subsection 45B(3) of the ITAA 1936 that section 45C applies in relation to the whole, or a part, of the Capital Component?

Answer

No.

Question 8


Answer

Question 9

Will the Commissioner make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(a) of the ITAA 1997 that a specified franking debit arises in Company A’s franking account in respect of the whole, or a part of the Dividend Component?

Answer

No.

Question 10

Will the Commissioner make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(a) of the ITAA 1936 that a franking debit arises in Company A’s franking account in respect of the Final Ordinary Dividend?

Answer

No.

Question 11

Will the Commissioner make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(a) of the ITAA 1997 that a franking debit arises in Company A’s franking account in respect of the Final Ordinary Dividend?

Answer

No.

Question 12

For the purpose of determining whether Company A has a withholding obligation under section 12-210 of Schedule 1 to the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA 1953) in respect of the Final Ordinary Dividend, will the Commissioner make a determination under either paragraph 177EA(5)(b) of the ITAA 1936 or paragraph 204-30(3)(c) of the ITAA 1997 in respect of the dividend?

Answer

No.

This ruling applies for the following period:

Income tax year ended 31 December 20xx in lieu of 30 June 20xx

The scheme commences on:

During the income tax year ended 31 December 20xx.

Relevant facts and circumstances

Relevant legislative provisions

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 45A

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 45A(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 45A(3)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 45B

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 45B(2)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 45B(2)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 45B(2)(c)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 45B(3)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 45B(5)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 45B(8)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 45B(9)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 45C

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 128B(3)(ga)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 159GZZZK(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 159GZZZN

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 159GZZZP(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 177D(2)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Section 177EA

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 177EA(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 177EA(5)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 177EA(5)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 177EA(5)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 177EA(14)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Paragraph 177EA(14)(d)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 177EA(16)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 177EA(17)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 177EA(18)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Subsection 177EA(19)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 202-5

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 202-40

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 202-40(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 202-45

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 202-45(c)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 204-15

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 204-30

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 204-30(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 204-30(1)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 204-30(1)(b)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 204-30(1)(c)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 204-30(3)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 204-30(3)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 204-30(6)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 204-30(6)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 204-30(6)(e)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 204-30(7)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 204-30(8)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Paragraph 204-30(8)(a)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 204-30(9)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 204-30(10)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Division 207

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Section 960-120

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 960-120(1)

Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 Subsection 995-1(1)

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Section 12-210 of Schedule 1

Taxation Administration Act 1953 Section 12-310 of Schedule 1

Reasons for decision

Question 1

Summary

Section 159GZZZN will apply to Company A such that the Buy-Back and any subsequent cancellation of the Company A Shares will be disregarded for the purposes listed in the section.

Detailed reasoning

Under section 159GZZZN, where a company buys-back a share then the buy-back, and any subsequent cancellation of the share, are disregarded for the purposes of:

Under the Buy-Back, Company A will buy-back Company A Shares within the meaning given by paragraph 159GZZZK(a). Pursuant to subsection 257H(3) of the Corporations Act 2001, immediately after the registration of the transfer to Company A of Company A Shares purchased under a buy-back, the Company A Shares are cancelled. Accordingly, the Buy-Back and the subsequent cancellation of Company A Shares will be disregarded for the purposes listed in section 159GZZZN. That is, for the purposes of determining whether Company A:

Question 2

Summary

Under subsection 159GZZZP(1), for each share bought back under the Buy-Back, the difference between the Buy-Back Price and the Capital Component of the Buy-Back Price will be taken to be a dividend paid by Company A out of profits it derived for the purposes of the ITAA 1936 and ITAA 1997.

Detailed reasoning

Deemed dividend

Subsection 159GZZZP(1) applies to the Buy-Back.

In the context of the Buy-Back, subsection 159GZZZP(1) will operate to treat the difference between:

to be a dividend (the Dividend Component) paid by Company A.

The Dividend Component is also taken under subsection 159GZZZP(1) to be paid to Participating Shareholders as shareholders in Company A, out of profits it derived, and on the day the Buy-Back occurs.

For each share bought back under the Buy-Back, Company A will debit the Capital Component against the amount standing to the credit of its untainted share capital account. As a result, under subsection 159GZZZP(1), for each share Company A purchases under the Buy-Back, the difference between:

will be taken to be a dividend paid by Company A out of profits derived by Company A for the purposes of the ITAA 1936 and the ITAA 1997.

Question 3

Summary

Under subsection 159GZZZP(1), the date of the Buy-Back is the day the Buy-Back agreement was entered into.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 159GZZZP(1) provides that a specified part of the purchase price of an off-market buy-back is deemed to be a dividend paid by the company ‘on the day the buy-back occurs’.

The Commissioner considers that the time the buy-back occurs for the purposes of the subsection is anytime on the day that the entities enter into the Buy-Back agreement.

Question 4

Summary

The entire Dividend Component of the Buy-Back Price will be a frankable distribution within the meaning given by subsection 202-40(1).

Detailed reasoning

Frankable distribution

The Dividend Component will constitute a ‘distribution’ within the meaning given by item 1 of the table in subsection 960-120(1) as:

… a dividend, or something that is taken to be a dividend, under this Act.

A distribution is a frankable distribution to the extent that it is not unfrankable under section 202-45 (subsection 202-40(1)).

As set out in the Detailed reasoning for Question 5 below, no part of the Dividend Component will constitute an unfrankable Dividend.

Therefore, the entire Dividend Component will constitute a frankable distribution for the purposes of subsection 202-40(1).

Question 5

Summary

Paragraphs 202-45(a) through to 202-45(j) will not apply to treat any part of the Dividend Component as an unfrankable distribution.

Detailed reasoning

Section 202-45 provides a list of distributions that are unfrankable as follows:

Paragraphs 202-45 (a) and (b) have been repealed.

Paragraph 202-45(c) is relevant to off-market share buy-backs, and provides that part of the Dividend Component is unfrankable to the extent that the Buy-Back Price of a share exceeds the share’s relevant ‘market value’. Company A will conduct the Buy-Back at a discount to market value and has provided an undertaking not to buy back a share for an amount that is greater than the market value of a Company A share calculated in accordance with TD 2004/22 and the methodology set out in Example 7 of Appendix A to PS LA 2007/9. As a result, paragraph 202-45(c) will not operate to treat any part of the Dividend Component as an unfrankable dividend.

None of the other paragraphs of section 202-45 apply to treat some or all of the Dividend Component of the Buy-Back Price as an unfrankable distribution for the purposes of subsection 202-40(1).

Question 6

Summary

The Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45A(2) that section 45C applies to the whole, or a part, of the Capital Component of the Buy-Back Price.

Detailed reasoning

Section 45A is an anti-avoidance rule that applies where a company:

Participating Shareholders will be provided with a capital benefit – being the Capital Component of the Buy-Back Price – under the Buy-Back in the form of a distribution of share capital (paragraph 45A(3)(b)).

Although a capital benefit will be provided to Participating Shareholders under the Buy-Back, the circumstances of the Buy-Back indicate that there is no particular streaming of capital benefits to some shareholders and dividends to other shareholders. In particular:

Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under subsection 45A(2) that section 45C applies to the whole, or a part, of the Capital Component of the Buy-Back Price.

Question 7

Summary

The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 45B(3)(b) that section 45C applies to the whole, or a part, of the Capital Component of the Buy-Back Price.

Detailed reasoning

Section 45B applies where:

The Buy-Back constitutes a ‘scheme’ within the meaning given by subsection 995-1(1). As set out above in the Detailed reasoning for Question 6 above, Participating Shareholders will be ‘provided with a capital benefit’ under the Buy-Back in the form of a distribution of share capital (paragraph 45B(5)(b)). As a result, the requirements of paragraph 45B(2)(a) is satisfied in respect of the Buy-Back.

Broadly, a Participating Shareholder ‘obtains a tax benefit’ under the Buy-Back if the amount of tax payable by a Participating Shareholder in respect of the Capital Component of the Buy-Back Price would be less than the amount of tax that would instead be payable if the Capital Component were instead an assessable dividend (subsection 45B(9)).

Whether a Participating Shareholder would obtain a tax benefit in respect of the Capital Component of the Buy-Back Price per share requires consideration of each Participating Shareholder’s particular circumstances on a case by case basis. Company A Shares are held by a wide variety of shareholders. Given that the Company A Shares have traded at no less than $X since 1 April 20xx and generally at higher amounts, it is likely that many Participating Shareholders will obtain a tax benefit under the Buy-Back and the requirements of paragraph 45B(2)(b) will in turn be satisfied.

Paragraph 45B(2)(c) provides that one must have regard to the ‘relevant circumstance’ of the Buy-Back to determine whether Company A or a Participating Shareholder entered into or carried out the Buy-Back for a more-than-incidental-purpose of enabling one or more Participating Shareholders to obtain a tax benefit.

The relevant circumstances to be considered are not exhaustively listed in subsection 45B(8) and include any of the matters set out in subsection 178D(2).

Following a consideration of the relevant circumstances of the Buy-Back, neither Company A nor a Participating Shareholder will enter into or carry out the Buy-Back for the requisite purpose of enabling a Participating Shareholder to obtain a tax benefit. In particular:

The tax benefit, if any, that may arise for a Participating Shareholder is incidental to the main or substantial purpose of the Buy-Back, being to efficiently distribute surplus capital to shareholders because of its strong balance sheet and cash flows position.

Therefore, section 45B will not apply to the Buy-Back. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 45B(3)(b) that section 45C applies to the whole, or a part of the capital benefit provided under the Buy-Back.

Question 8

Summary

Detailed reasoning

Section 177EA is a general anti-avoidance provision that applies to franking credit trading schemes where one of the purposes (other than an incidental purpose) of the schemes is to obtain a franking credit benefit. The provision applies to schemes for the disposition of shares or an interest in shares, where a franked distribution is paid or payable in respect of the shares or an interest in shares which includes an off-market share buy-back with a franked dividend component.

Subsection 177EA(3) provides that section 177EA applies if:

For section 177EA to apply, the five specific conditions set out in paragraphs 177EA(3)(a) to (e) must each be present (conjunctive). For the Buy-Back, the conditions of paragraphs 177EA(3)(a) to (d) will be satisfied as follows:

Paragraph 177EA(3)(e) requires a conclusion that Company A, its Participating Shareholders or any other relevant party entered into the Buy-Back with a more-than-incidental-purpose of enabling the Participating Shareholders (each a relevant taxpayer) to obtain an imputation benefit. In arriving at a conclusion as to purpose under paragraph 177EA(3)(e), the Commissioner must have regard to the relevant circumstances of the arrangement which are not exhaustively outlined in subsection 177EA(17).

The most relevant circumstance for the proposed Buy-Back is its greater attraction to resident shareholders who could fully utilise the franking credits than to non-resident shareholders. Paragraph 177EA(17)(b) states:

The meaning of the phrase ‘given greater benefit from franking credits’ is further and not exhaustively set out in subsections 177EA(18) and (19). For direct distributions such as those which will be received by the Participating Shareholders, the Note following subsection 177EA(19) refers to subsections 204-30(7) to (10).

Subsection 204-30(8) lists circumstances that apply for Company A’s Participating Shareholders. Paragraph 204-30(8)(a) looks to the greater attraction of the imputation benefits attached to the Dividend Component of the Buy-Back Price to (certain) resident Participating Shareholders than for non-resident shareholders.

As treaty non-residents hold a percentage of Company A shares, the Commissioner concludes that the terms and conditions of the Buy-Back were unattractive to the non-resident shareholders.

Paragraphs 177EA(17)(c), (d), (g) and (j) are also relevant to the Buy-Back. These paragraphs state:

For the purposes of paragraph 177EA(17)(c), Company A has a history of distributing fully franked dividends to its shareholders. Regardless of the Buy-Back, Company A intends to continue to make franked distributions to shareholders.

Accordingly, with or without the Buy-Back, that portion of franking credits would be used in paying franked distributions to its shareholders, but the portion which would be used for the Buy-Back would otherwise be retained by Company A.

For the purposes of paragraph 177EA(17)(d), any increased, fully franked dividends that Company A would otherwise pay to its shareholders in the absence of the Buy-Back may flow directly or indirectly to another entity subject to paragraph 17EA(17(b).

For the purposes of paragraph 177(17)(g), the Sale Consideration of the Capital Component per share as adjusted by the operation of subsection 159GZZZQ(2) is less than the trading price of Company A Shares. Therefore, the Buy-Back Price will most likely result in Participating Shareholders making capital losses or being entitled to allowable deductions.

Finally, as referred in paragraph 177EA(17)(j), the matters outlined in subsection 177D(2) also requires consideration. However, as observed in Mills v Federal Commissioner of Taxation 2011 ATC 20-247 at 131, many of the matters referred to in subsection 177D(2) have no application beyond the extent to which those circumstances have already been taken into account for the other circumstances in subsection 177EA(17).

In relation to the Buy-Back, the Commissioner considers that the matters raised by paragraph 177EA(17)(j) have already been taken into account in the discussion above.

Having regard to all the relevant circumstances of the Buy-Back discussed above but with particular weight attributed to paragraph 177EA(17)(b), the Commissioner is of the view that section 177EA applies to the Buy-Back.

Where section 177EA applies, the Commissioner has a discretion pursuant to subsection 177EA(5) to make a determination to debit the company’s franking account under paragraph 177EA(5)(a), or to deny the imputation benefit arising to each Participating Shareholder under paragraph 177EA(5)(b).

The Commissioner’s practice is to apply paragraph 177EA(5)(a) where a buy-back price achieved does not achieve a discount greater than the maximum acceptable level of discount of 14% of the VWAP of the Company A Shares for the five days up to and including the Closing Date of the buy-back.

Company A has provided an undertaking not to purchase Company A Shares under the Buy-Back at a discount greater than 14% of the VWAP of the Company A Shares for the five days leading up to and including the Closing Date of the Buy-Back. As a result, the Commissioner will exercise his discretion in such a way as to debit Company A’s franking account pursuant to subsection 177EA(5)(a).

Company A has indicated that it would accept such a franking debit and that the franking debit ought to be calculated in accordance with PS LA 2007/9.

The Commissioner will calculate the franking debit to Company A’s franking account using the following formula:

The Franking credit attaching to each Company A Share will be calculated as follows:

Question 9

The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(a) that a specified franking debit arises in Company A’s franking account in respect of the whole, or a part of the Dividend Component.

Detailed reasoning

Subsection 204-30(1) empowers the Commissioner to make a determination if a corporate tax entity streams one or more distributions (or one or more distributions and the giving of other benefits), to its members in such a way that:

If the conditions in subsection 204-30(1) are met, the Commissioner may make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(a) that a franking debit arises in the franking account of the entity for a specified distribution or other benefit to a disadvantaged member.

The requirements of subsection 204-30(1) are satisfied in respect of the Buy-Back because:

Accordingly, the conditions in subsection 204-30(1) are met and the Commissioner could make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(a) that a franking debit arises in the franking account of Company A for a specified distribution or other benefit to a disadvantaged Company A shareholder.

However, paragraph 142 of PS LA 2007/9 states that the Commissioner will generally not make a determination pursuant to subsection 204-30(3) in cases where he intends exercising his discretion under section 177EA.

As the Commissioner intends to exercise his discretion under paragraph 177EA(5)(a) such that a franking debit will arise in the franking account of Company A in respect of the franked dividends as part of the Buy-Back, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(a).

Question 10

Summary

The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(a) that a franking debit arises in Company A’s franking account in respect of the Final Ordinary Dividend.

Detailed reasoning

An explanation of subsection 177EA(3) is set out above in the Detailed reasoning for Question 8.

For section 177EA to apply, the five specific conditions set out in paragraphs 177EA(3)(a) to (e) must each be present (conjunctive).

The Final Ordinary Dividend will be paid to all Company A shareholders that hold shares on the Record Date.

For the Final Ordinary Dividend, the paragraph 177EA(3)(a) requirement will not be satisfied as it will not be paid as part of a scheme for disposition of membership interests as defined in paragraphs 177EA(14)(b) and (d).

As one of the conjunctive requirements of subsection 177EA(3) does not apply for the Final Ordinary Dividend, section 177EA cannot apply and therefore the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(a) that a franking debit arises in Company A’s franking account for the Final Ordinary Dividend.

Question 11

Summary

The Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(a) that a franking debit arises in Company A’s franking account in respect of the Final Ordinary Dividend.

Detailed reasoning

An explanation of subsection 204-30(1) is set out in the Detailed reasoning for Question 9.

The Final Ordinary Dividend will be paid relevantly to all Company A shareholders that hold Company A Shares on the Record Date.

‘Streaming’ is not defined for the purposes of section 204-30. However, the Commissioner considers that it refers to a company ‘selectively directing the flow of franked distributions to those members who can most benefit from the imputation credits’ (paragraph 3.28 of the Explanatory Memorandum to the New Business Tax System (Imputation) Bill 2002).

For section 204-30 to apply, members to whom distributions are streamed must derive a greater benefit from franking credits than another member of the entity. The words ‘derive a greater benefit from franking credits’ are defined in subsection 204-30(8) by reference to the ability of the members to fully utilise imputation benefits.

Under the current arrangement, all shareholders will receive an imputation benefit when the Final Ordinary Dividend is paid. The imputation benefit for resident shareholders is in the form of a tax offset (paragraph 204-30(6)(a)), and for non-resident shareholders is in the form of not being liable to pay dividend withholding tax (paragraph 204-30(6)(e)). The resident shareholders may derive a greater benefit from franking credits than the non-resident shareholders.

However, the Final Ordinary Dividend will be paid equally to all Company A shareholders and will be fully franked regardless of their tax profiles.

The Commissioner accepts that Company A has not selectively directed the flow of franked, Final Ordinary Dividend distributions to those members who could most benefit from the franking credits.

As the conditions in subsection 204-30(1) will not be met, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(a) that a franking debit arises in Company A’s franking account.

Question 12

Summary

For the purpose of determining whether Company A has a withholding obligation under section 12-210 of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 in respect of the Final Ordinary Dividend, the Commissioner will not make a determination under either paragraph 177EA(5)(b) or paragraph 204-30(3)(c) in respect of the dividend.

Detailed reasoning

Dividend withholding obligations under the TAA 1953

Section 12-210 of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 provides that a company that is an Australian resident must withhold an amount from a dividend it pays if:

Company A advised that the shareholders in Company A are a mix of individuals, companies and superannuation funds, some of whom are non-residents. A percentage of Company A’s shares are held by non-resident shareholders that reside in jurisdictions that Australia has a double tax agreement with.

Section 12-300 of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 provides limits on the amount to be withheld as follows:

Under paragraph 128B(3)(ga), liability to withholding tax does not apply to:

As discussed in the Detailed reasoning for Question 10 and for Question 11 above, neither section 204-30 nor section 177EA applies to the Final Ordinary Dividend. Accordingly, the Commissioner will not make a determination under paragraph 204-30(3)(c) or a determination under paragraph 177EA(5)(b) that no imputation benefit is to arise in respect of the Final Ordinary Dividend to a non-resident shareholder.

Therefore, due to the operation of paragraph 128B(3)(ga), section 12-300 of Schedule 1 to the TAA 1953 will not apply to require Company A to withhold an amount on the Final Ordinary Dividend. This is because withholding tax is not payable on the Final Ordinary Dividend that Company A will pay to a non-resident shareholder as the Final Ordinary Dividend will be fully franked.


Copyright notice

© Australian Taxation Office for the Commonwealth of Australia

You are free to copy, adapt, modify, transmit and distribute material on this website as you wish (but not in any way that suggests the ATO or the Commonwealth endorses you or any of your services or products).